He was a homosexual

1855 is the only good edition. According to Roy Harvey Pierce, the 1856 edition is the “definitive” one.

Wherefore, God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness: to dishonour their own bodies among themselves. Who changed the truth of God into a lie and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

For this cause, God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts, one towards another: men with men, working that which is filthy and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error.

And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient. Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness: full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity: whisperers, Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, foolish, dissolute: without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death: and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.

Attached: 1527438056534.png (642x705, 303K)

tldr: lol whatever

>tldr
Time to go back.

sorry, mr. fox - youll always have autism

Yeah, we all know that.

good post and im hearing you on that

Attached: ex3xwox6cmr11.png (1083x1128, 51K)

Caring about another'man's sexuality is kinda gay, OP.

based and redpilled

Attached: 1563165056419s.jpg (120x124, 2K)

what of it

The first and the last.

gross

Always funny how /pol/ accuses everyone else of thinking alike and being "non playable characters," and yet THEY all spout the same exact rhetoric themselves.

Really tickles the fucking noggin

>He was a homosexual.
That's why (((they))) made him famous.

>unrelated issue
>muh joos
kys

Whitman’s gayness dovetailed with Victorian bro-love comradeship so well that most of his contemporaries were clueless about how faggy he was. He lost his government job over his hetero erotic poems, not the gay stuff like everyone assumes. Foreign aesthetes like Oscar Wilde easily discerned what he was about but most contemporary American critics were freaked out by his stylistic innovations and working class background, not by rough macho bro bonding and comradeship.

Naw. He just liked playing the fucking banjo. Shit...is that a metaphor? Fuck it. He was queer.

Attached: download.jpg (250x182, 11K)