Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

Attached: Hegel and Schopenhauer.jpg (990x990, 702K)

Hegel was the bigger man for sure.
>Despite their differences and the arrogant request to schedule lectures at the same time as his own, Hegel still voted to accept Schopenhauer to the university.

Schopenhauer made stunning mistakes in comparison to Hegel, but Hegel was also a more traditional philosopher. It's an easy win for Hegel.

what mistakes for example?

Hegel - Reddit
Schopenhauer - Yea Forums
Stirner - 9gag

Hegel - Sadler
Schopenhauer - r/incels

Attached: 517E599F-64D4-41F3-BD50-5979F96A0B5D.jpg (480x360, 18K)

Hegel - Postgrad
Schopenhauer - Undergrad
Stirner - Highschool

>le cross-eyed retard face

Will you ever fuck off?

Accurate

Retard

Reminder

Attached: schopenhauerhume.jpg (850x400, 67K)

Schopenhauer was super bitter. It's hard to even take him seriously about the things he said about Hegel.

At least Hegel didn't make the presumption's about things outside of our reality

Why was Schopenhauer so bitter about Hegel?

Respecting Hume is always a good sign

Because he was an extremely acerbic person. Imagine Wittgenstein twice as autistic and half as well-rounded, that's the sort of arrogance that old man Schopenhauer had.

i like schope but hegel was much more important and influential

The only people who like Hegel are pseuds. .

Schopenhauer jealousy was an example of slave morality even if he was right about Hegel (he wasn't though)

Attached: 234235235.png (1617x1012, 1.52M)

No such thing as a pseud cope'nhauer

pseud cope'nharder

Very true.

Why are you comparing Count Olaf to Hegel?

more like half as autistic and twice as well rounded

>tears hegel apart with superior dialectic
>pinpoints schopenhauer as a representative of the merely "interesting" and momentary, who can't take the leap to becoming an ascetic himself
nothin personnel.....

Attached: kierkegaard.png (460x460, 71K)

le superstitious be yourself man

This cannot be overstated.

*eats your attack on faith*
>I am the better pleased with the method of reasoning here delivered, as I think it may serve to confound those dangerous friends or disguised enemies to the Christian Religion, who have undertaken to defend it by the principles of human reason. Our most holy religion is founded on Faith, not on reason; and it is a sure method of exposing it to put it to such a trial as it is, by no means, fitted to endure.

Attached: smug fat anglo h*me.jpg (733x550, 62K)

>tears hegel apart
Oh that's cute. Checked btw

Hume wasn't an ang*o thank God, he was a proud Celtic Scot

Schopenhauer was right to call Hegel an obscurantist and a charlatan but he was wrong to use those epithets as reproaches. As philosophy had become more complicated it had started to become absolutely essential to be obscure and a charlatan to achieve success in academia. Imagine if French philosophers of the second half of the 20th century had written clearly and sensibly. No one would have taken them seriously.

Schopenhauer shat on Hegel strictly out of envy. Hegel went places other philosophers hadn't, perceiving in the turmoil of history an ordered pattern and developmental process. Schopenhauer didn't like that all the college kids lined up for Hegel's lectures and not his.

>reason is worth nothing, everything is subjective
>*proceeds to write thousands of pages worthless if judged by its own criteria*

Schopenhauer would've been 100% right if he would have been less serious about it.

Which philosopher has the most neologies/jargon per sentence in the history of philosophy?

I wonder whether it would be possible to develop an entirely new philosophical language consisting entirely of jargon.

Literally, the easiest to read -french philosophers- were the most famous; the obscure ones, as simondon or laruelle, were the least famous.

Hegel managed to turn the word "this" into jargon, so purely by density it's gotta be him.

Name one post-structuralist (or whatever the fuck D&G were) French philosopher that expressed their ideas with an emphasis on concision.

>no emphasis on concision = difficult to read
Really? all the famous french postmodern -d&g, focutault, lyotard, etc- were easy to read. D&G's autism was the only semi-obscure stuff to read at that time.

Hegel was a pseud. Some of his claims in PoS describe a metaphysics he never proved, and that is contrary to the Church.

Hegel.
You can put Deleuze as candidate, but although he made bunch of neology when Deleze put neology he made whole chapter of it. It's different from Hegel who tries to mix from near beginning.

butthurt catholic detected

The digits fit the post quite well.

>Hegel was the bigger man for sure.
Really? No one else has said it? ... Fine.
...
...
4u

Oh look, the fat man from my nightmares

Tumblr

reminder that Hegel thought history would literally not continue after 19th century Prussia