Ligotti's and Schopenhauer's premises require the identification of pain with bad. Yes, of course if you consider pain the definition of bad, life is undesirable. But if this were the case, that bad and pain are synonymous, then Brave New World would seem like a utopia. However our soul, or perhaps our spirit, instinctively recoils from it as abominable. Why is this? Because pain is not the same as bad. Pain can be bad or good.
Have children
Mason Sanders
Nathan Edwards
Aye, Ligotti's take seems to be straightforwardly the result of his clinical anhedonia - makes for some uniquely affecting atmospheric prose, but not much further.
Jaxson Sanchez
If only he knew his ahedonism would not follow him to Jannah
Blake Mitchell
Pain is bad, fuck you.
So is Islam.
Tyler Sanchez
Jordan Morgan
schopenhauer isnt anti natalist retard
William Barnes
based and neetpilled
Ethan Bennett
He literally praised pederastry because it didn't lead to procreation
Levi Green
Dumb frogposter
Hudson Harris
Have children
Nathan Stewart
Tell me about Islam user, would it actually help me start a family? I'd like that, but as a poor Ameriburger it doesn't look likely in the near future.
Brayden Nelson
No
They might grow up to be dumb frogposters too
Colton Fisher
It would if you got a good job or education (the former is attainable through a mosque if you become sincere in the eyes of an orthodox community)
Lincoln Ramirez
not the same thing as being anti natalist retard
Ian Jones
How not? He considered procreation unethical
Anthony Evans
good, fuck life, I wish my mother aborted me FUCK HER FUCK HER FUCK HER
Levi Powell
based
Andrew Cooper
citation needed
Wyatt James
Early in volume 4 when Schop gives a complete analysis of procreation as part of the will to life
Sebastian Reed
Based and Jungerpilled.
Robert Howard
That is a good essay. Have you read Mishima?