Why does nobody take philosophy seriously?

>why does nobody take philosophy seriously?

Attached: Capture.png (410x627, 91K)

because the early philosophers of the western world were also the scientists attempting to understand both the physical and metaphysical. science is now its own faction of discipline, and we frankly just know more now than we did then. a lot more. philosophy has gone the way of the rest of the humanities because we have traded our humanity for an obsession with technology and modern science.

Who is pic related?

That looks pretty based.

Based.

Forms are unscientific. Only genes and teleoplexy matter.

Based autistic poster. I'll explain the subtext to you. The post was mocking those like you who wonder why philosophy isn't taken seriously when one of the most important contemporary philosophers is producing shit like pic related.
Nick Land.

pic related and the merit of it has little to do with what I said. common logic, debate, and analysis are rarely considered anymore. when's the last time you saw a decent public debate?

>pic related and the merit of it has little to do with what I said.
Then what you said has little to do with the thread

>most important contemporary philosophers is producing shit like pic related
Meme Land isn't important at all outside of a few schizo circles. That said, there is a nugget of truth that much of continental philosophy is barely more than word salad and actively detrimental to philosophical inquiry(analytical have issues too, but it don't actually make people dumber as a rule like continental does).

>the progenitor of accelerationism isn't important

Analytic philosophy was ok during logical positivism, even better with Quine, but now thanks to D. M. Armstrong & Co it's back to being just linguistic confusion.

>pic related is important

Accelerationism as a concept pretates Land by literally over a century, and its particular type of AI gods and technological rapture is had already been formulated before he had even reach puberty. Land only shoved a bunch of nonsense into it to look smart.

>accelerationism is relevant

Attached: 90s-rave-fashion-1.jpg (800x543, 55K)

>pretates
predates*

you gay

That's simply not true. You can trace strands of it back to Marx, but accelerationism as it's understood comes straight out of the CCRU

Accelerationism just means pushing a particular element in hopes that it leds to a social change, such as pushing capitalism to get communism, with its modern shape being basically "technological grow will fix our social problems, somehow, also technorapture". CCRU was just an excuse to a bunch of college students to do hard drugs while pretending to be doing something useful.

This and only this.

t. proto meta-human.

Attached: flmgivq02iy21.jpg (917x960, 95K)

Unfair example; that text was literally written for an art publication (Chapman bros.).

It's in fanged noumena, one of Lands major works.

You are talking about Marxist accelerationism, which is not the same thing as accelerationism as we understand and discuss it today. Is it related? Sure, in the same way Kant's transcendental idealism is related to Hegel's absolute idealism.

Land didn't publish Fanged Noumena, read the introduction you jabroni

>one of
>major
You need to go back.

Based retard poster.

So?

are philosophers supposed to be barred from having fun and making art?

>so artistic man... it's like a story but impossible to read

so they are?

retard anglo bugbrain

They can do what they want. Just don't complain in your little reaction images about scientists not taking philosophy seriously when this is the shit it produces. Remember fanged noumena is meant to be an essential work of contemporary philosophy.

why does it matter if scientists dont take contemporary philosophy seriously? the OP said "anybody" and im pretty sure scientists account for a very small percentage of everyone

The NICK LAND is the epitome of male dominance and masculinity.

Let's start by looking at his body. His body is bony. His unsettling gait makes his presence known without him even needing to point himself out. He is thin, as a result of his high levels of k-NOVA amphetamine ingestion. This gives him the appearance of vitality and strength. He is then covered by his pale skin. This pallid skin reminds us of his inhumanity, a feature that developed due to being exposed to the scorching light of Shanghai streetlights and laptop screens, made to withstand such an extreme condition. It also has a psychological effect on the observer. The pallid skin reminds us of our teleoplexic, machinic desires that emerge from reading e-flux on modafinil.

The NICK LAND's demeanor is one of alphaness. He is dominant, assertive, and can be explosively schizophrenic. His communion with the lemurs of the pentazygon strikes fear into the more timid, cowardly races of fleshbot (h*man dogs)

FANGED NOUMENA is the most masculine of Urbanomic's output. This is able to fulfill the desire of the neediest of undergraduate shitposters, being able to more than fill all the recesses of the intellect. Its k-viral schizoanalysis ensures that when it ejaculates, the potent accelerationist seed will immediately enter the human security system of the fleshbot NICK LAND impregnates.

In total, the NICK LAND expresses his pentazygon qabbalistic k-code in a most exemplary manner in bed. When he fucks, he unleashes the entirety of his bitcoin wallet and amazon e-books upon his partner without any restraint.

All this is the reason why the NICK LAND is the epitome of masculinity.

Žižek-Peterson

Because literally nothing of value comes from it lmao. Get a job.

Logical positivism and Quine are the dark ages, Armstrong and company did philosophy a favor, otherwise analytic philosophy would have remained a procrustean pro-science but anti-realist mess.

How so? They brought it straight back into the cul-de-sac from which it had just got out. There was no question of realism in logical positivism because that of the objective reality of the external world was a cognitively meaningless pseudoquestion. Neither was there a question of realism for Quine’s pragmatism since all that philosophy was supposed to do according to him was organize scientific findings. So accusing them of dwelling into an anti-realistic mess makes sense only from the metaphysical mess in which Armstrong, Kripke, Searle etc threw analytic philosophy.