*single-handedly ruins all western philosophy forever*

*single-handedly ruins all western philosophy forever*

Attached: martin-heidegger-2.jpg (900x750, 81K)

How so?

Oh okay, if you say so

Destabilizing it by acting surprised that philosophy didn't deal with mundane day-to-day actions, and then made it all about those mundane day-to-day actions — effectively making it not philosophy. Of course he wasn't going to find gardening and eating and shitting in metaphysics, but instead he has to force them into metaphysics, bringing all philosophy down to the mundane and on the same level as shitting and eating. If he had wanted to live day-to-day, he should have done so, as billions of people do without the need of convoluted terms and idiosyncratic lexicon to do so.

Ah. I see. Just a triggered cucktard

Why do we need philosophy and complicated terms to put food in our mouths and shit when our bowels are full? Why do we need philosophy to walk down the street?

If philosophy has no connection to reality, what is the point? The result is a bunch of pseuds tinkering with information out in some hyperspace with no connection whatsoever to reality.
I won't name names, but they are generally the most popular 'thinkers' on the board.

I don't think there is a point. I just don't understand why Heidegger was so intent on making philosophy about being in the here and now and then abstracted the here and now even more as a result.

What if that was his plan all along?

Daily life isn't reality.

You don’t. Heidegger’s philosophy is a way for the PHILOSOPHER (who’s already ealing with the more complicated topics) to also consider the role of the mundane, to connect the more complicated stuff (such as Aesthetics, Epistemology, Metaphysics) to Being (what you call mundane). An alternative to Heidegger’s onto-ontology would be something like psychoanalysis.

Maybe not to pseuds like you.

Well, now I feel like a dumbass for misinterpreting him so badly.

That's not Heidegger at all, read his books not wikipedia

Heidegger critiques metaphysics, period, as a misleading distinction in being. The reason he uses day to day is twofold: 1, it is the most direct way to understsnd what defines being, because that is how we encounter it everyday. 2, the state of exception is more accentuated, the Kierkegardian "decision"

Attached: download (6).jpg (327x154, 12K)

That would be Schopenhauer introducing metaphysical voluntarism and the Zeitgeist to Western philosophy.

You have never read Heidegger and it shows

Heidegger just uses the Kant's critique to Descartes "tautology" "Cogito ergo sum" and takes it to extremes. Kant assume that being is not a a predicate, nor the subject, its being there in the time (setzung). He just didnt realize it and didnt use it on the transcendental subject description. We can see that in the use of Dasein even in Kant's KPR, on the chapter where he speaks about the ontological proof of god by Descartes; the name of the chapter is :"(...)des Dasein Gottes" or something like that.

I meant St. Anselmo ontological proof of god's existance impossibility chapter

If you're to blame someone blame Kant for planting this evil seed

Good post. Fuck the Heideggerians, they're all country bumpkins like him who should have never encountered the subject of philosophy in their lives.

Nietzche: "He who knoweth the reader, doeth nothing more for the reader. Another century of readers—and spirit itself will stink."

How does seeking to bring philosophy back to the overlooked question of being, reclaiming areas of interest of Heraclitus and Parmenides, making it all about 'shitting'? How can a philosophy claim to be coherent if it 1) does not address Being and 2) has completely dissipated itself outside of any realistic frame of reference?

>t. never walked the Field Path

he was a nazi so i disregard everything he said

truepilled

cringe

Honestly he could have been part of any ideology, I disregard the people in every case. You can't claim to be in search of even a single truth if you believe in man made blinders.

let me guess
>he was a nazi!!

let me guess
>Nazis were totally okay
no no no, let me guess again
>Nazis were actually the good guys
Or maybe, hear me out here for a second incel
>Nazis winning would have been BASED

You pathetic self important fags are embarassing, not just to you but also your board that is functionally a subreddit by now. Go back to your based and redpilled echo chamber, the only agreement you get is from other redditors.

amazing you inferred that all from one greentext, you spastic retard

he cute

Post-modernism

>all western philosophy
Are there other kinds of philosophy?

Isn't it funny how the school system (american at least) doesn't teach us why the nazis hated the jews?

It's because you're american and can't think (apparently)

is he jewish?

>do you NEED this is this NEEDED is this a NECESSITY is something NEEDY NEEDY NEEDY NEED
utilitycuck anglobrains need to fucking mass suicide for the utilitarian benefit of society

literal 80 iq post, fucking find your home on reddit and never psot here again shit for brains nigger retard anglo

They were outcompeted by a superior collective in their own backyard.
It's like a schoolyard bully beating up the nerdy kid because he can't compete in the classroom.

Seesthing incels

Not Heigegger. Go read

Division 1 of Being and Time is really good, though, particularly the 4th chapter on Moods. Chapter 3, "The Worldhood of the World," is also essential. Otherwise, yeah, he's a fascist, and not even in the trendy way people use it today. The guy is Nazi to the core. So, you should probably read Division II of Being and Time (on the fatedness of peoples) and Introduction to Metaphysics, too.

reddit

there's nothing wrong about ruining a house with improper foundation

That would be the Frankfurt School.

Next time go the extra mile and read what his attempts at philosophy were in fact all about, eh user

10/10 post....triggered Highniggerians can't handle the truth.

"Hurr durr let's all rage quit philosophy and return to a primitive, animal-like mindset."

Not to mention his stupid conception of western history, which Gadamer debunked.

Reminder that Heidegger progressively realized that his entire philosophy was a mistake. He understood Being and Time was a failure and tried another course of action. Then he realized that too was a failure and asked to speak to a Catholic priest and receive a Catholic funeral.

He never really understood Aquinas. Radical atheist Lutheranism? Not even once.

His wife was a bigger Nazi and he cheated on her repeatedly with Jewish women.

His wife joined the Nazis before he did and Heidegger would play down Jewish influence when she would rant about them in front of guests. Heidegger's Black Notebooks are relatively tame and contain maybe 20 paragraphs about Jews out of the entire multi-volume series.

But Farias is right and Derrida is wrong. His philosophy ends up looking something like National Socialism, but the problem even for Nazis is that Heidegger easily tips over into neo-liberal deconstruction. Heidegger did not respect any contemporary philosophy except for Derrida, whom he invited to his cabin but Derrida backed out at the last minute.

cope tranny schizo

>Otherwise, yeah, he's a fascist, and not even in the trendy way people use it today. The guy is Nazi to the core
about as reddit as it gets

That's literally Heidegger. He screeched autistically at Aristotle because he decided to move on and address some other questions for a change.

retard

No one believes you.

>I am a Kantian
>refute me

Attached: neohunjbag arrib from gabbidull.jpg (171x266, 17K)