Had had

>had had

what's the alternative to this?

Attached: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH.jpg (3456x4608, 1.32M)

Maybe learn to write before asking stupid questions.

habuerat

>he had had enough
Just goes to
>he had enough
Literally just go from had had to had. Not hard.

Just write a new term and call anyone that doesn't like it a brainlet that that doesn't understand your genius.

ha'd've

Attached: 1515359706007.jpg (3300x1600, 1.2M)

They don't mean the same thing. There is literally nothing wrong with using 'had had'

Had'd

'd had
as in, i'd had, you'd had, etc. nothing wrong with this contraction, especially considering how it prevents that autism

contract the first had.

french

maybe just abbreviate the first "had" into
>He'd had

that solves the weird repetition but leaves the meaning intact

user'd had?

I want to learn, where should I lurk?

>avait eu

Hudud

Attached: D6vMNgCVsAA5M2S.jpg (828x1205, 124K)

once had
only had
*some limiting temporal adverb could work in some instances

Start writing in a real language

English is so unaesthetic. It's a mutt language of g*rman, angl*id, and just enough french to pretend to be civilized.

lurk in a book on writing

get get get get got got got got blood rush to my head lit hot lock poppin off the fuckin block knot clockin wrist slit watch bent thought bot