Why does nu-Yea Forums hate him so much?

Why does nu-Yea Forums hate him so much?

Attached: George_Orwell_press_photo.jpg (1176x1596, 2.62M)

Other urls found in this thread:

orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/notes-on-nationalism/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Old Yea Forums was a bastion of retards. Ayn Rand fags, Stirner fags, and general libertarian air about it because people wanted to justify their wasteful, hedonistic, anime and video game lives. Orwell was a loser and people who like that of course gravitate toward him. Fuck Orwell and fuck you.

based

Non-political orwell is good. Shooting an elephant, Burmese days and coming up for air I really enjoyed. Haven't read Road to Wigan pier yet.
1984 and animal farm are worth a read, they just don't deserve the pedastle lefty kids put them on

old-Yea Forums here. I don't remember anyone really liking him

Based

Because he told them the truth

Attached: 04f07b0c7c474c9575806774e3b31577af5191.jpg (640x920, 52K)

A smart man but a dreadful writer, for the most part. His writing is efficient but in an almost tedious, pencil-pushing way. Part of the problem is that his stories are vehicles for direct critique rather than natural artistic expression.

BLOW STEAM BLOW STEM BLOW MORE STEAM I LIKE IT BABY

Attached: FE469A43-2059-47B3-9CBD-8CE99F1F4713.png (1600x800, 1.93M)

Pseuds hate him because he's accessible and authoritarians hate him because he rekt them. Yea Forums has tons of pseuds and authoritarians.

Their claiming he didn’t sniff enough panties, but I disagree, honestly it’s not about how much panties you ended up sniffing, it’s the quality of the panties you sniff, the woman who wears them, they pussy whomst they touch.

Attached: 1554388366940.png (500x504, 115K)

So what you’re basically saying is, half of Yea Forums hate him because of simplicity, and the other half hate him because his use of simplicity to debunked their faulty logic?

No, we, dont

Orwell wasn't a libertarian and was nothing like Ayn Rand. He fought for the Party of Marxist Unification in Spain, to give you an idea. Rand defended selfishness, not socialism.

This t b h.

Orwell is great. Currently reading Down and Out in Paris and London.

>pedastle
illiterate b&

he was a lefty and Yea Forums has become overcoded with right-wing politics

Yea Forums got /pol/ed. Thus any left-wing authors automatically fell out of favor.

Pretty much.

Best thing said ITT honestly, and I used simplicity to emphasise what you said, :) good laugh user, enjoy your night

Orwell gets just as much flack from hardcore commies and dischord trannies as he does from /pol/ Nazis.

you're right.

:) :) :) :)

Orwell engages in a great deal of 'both sides are the same' criticism.
orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/notes-on-nationalism/
>So long as it is applied merely to the more notorious and identifiable nationalist movements in Germany, Japan, and other countries, all this is obvious enough. Confronted with a phenomenon like Nazism, which we can observe from the outside, nearly all of us would say much the same things about it. But here I must repeat what I said above, that I am only using the word ‘nationalism’ for lack of a better. Nationalism, in the extended sense in which I am using the word, includes such movements and tendencies as Communism, political Catholicism, Zionism, Antisemitism, Trotskyism and Pacifism. It does not necessarily mean loyalty to a government or a country, still less to one’s own country, and it is not even strictly necessary that the units in which it deals should actually exist. To name a few obvious examples, Jewry, Islam, Christendom, the Proletariat and the White Race are all of them objects of passionate nationalistic feeling: but their existence can be seriously questioned, and there is no definition of any one of them that would be universally accepted.

because libertarianism is a phase experienced from around 15 to 19 yo