Is it true that alpha men find reading emasculating? My father is an alpha and I never seen him with a book in his hand...

If you have to worry about what is considered "alpha" then, suffice to say you are not, nor will you ever be an alpha. So there's no point in even worrying.

Social hierarchy based on wolves that was later disproved.

YA GOTTA EAT YOUR LOBSTERS BUCKO

the alpha meme isnt implying humans literally behave like wolves. its just a shorthand way of referring to the social success of people. if you're denying that there are people of higher and lower social standings then you're just retarded

Obviously there are people of higher or lower standings, but implying that some men are inherently and biologically "alpha" and some men "beta" is completely without evidence.

Reading for a reason beyond raw utility has traditionally been the preoccupation of ruling and leisure casts. Serfs and slaves had no reason to read up until recently, and that need is diminishing along with the need for serfs and slaves at all.

Being born tall, with good looks, and a muscular body will definitely make you more prone to succeed in the social game than someone who's a 5'6 manlet with a negative canthal tilt and a recessed chin.

Here's Jeff Bezos, one of the most successful men alive today, ain't he a hottie?

Attached: jeff.jpg (1053x1481, 1M)

the alpha reads but that doesn't stop him from being /fit/, playing/watching sports, interacting with people. If you just read closed in your room all day you are not alpha

>colored picture of the biggest slaves owner

>make you more prone to succeed in the social game
No one said you can't be a billionaire because you're ugly, just that things are easier for those who aren't. Also, the people who constatly spout things about 'betas' and 'alphas' aren't some blackpilled biological determinists. Much by the contrary, they believe that by learning 'game' and 'frame' or whatever, they can become alpha too. So i never understood your argument, and it seems to be a common repeated one. The wolf things is just a comparison, not something to be taken so seriously, it's just a terminology like 'bluepilled' or 'redpilled.

this is Yea Forums, not /fa/ or lookism
you can just sum it up as looks matter to a certain extent, no need to go through the entirety of your pathetic little checklist

what if i go to gym to get really big and my plan is to roid and be as big as i can get while being a complete recluse writer? i'll write a masterpiece and then kill myself and i want a contrast between the passive proustian observer nature of my books (in style and content) with the tall, muscular greek god body nature of my physical appearance. am i still a beta faggot?

The chimpout that happens when lookism is mentioned outside of lookism is really telling. Cope, pure cope.

i was the one who brought it up though? there is no need to go into that much detail about it, just from the point of you (at least thats what i assume) trying to write a decent post

Mishima already existed you idiot. Find your way

but he was a chink manlet, i don't find him very alpha

And the beta still got divorced by his slutwife and had half his money taken away. Bad example there, retard.

yeah lol, no amount of money will change your face, frame and height unless you want to go full blown retard and become unrecognizable to people who know you. this means that no matter how much power and money you have, CHAD will still cuck you because he's BIOLOGICALLY superior.

great excuse for being pathetic, buddy
try harder next time