How come socialists are always dumpy losers who act like the most morally superior dipshits...

How come socialists are always dumpy losers who act like the most morally superior dipshits? I've met so many socialists who are the sort of people you wish you could punch square in the nose, they're so fucking braindead and stupid but think they're smart because they read Karl Marx.

I hate capitalism and I'd consider myself post-capitalist, I really liked Bertrand Russell's Proposed Roads to Freedom: Socialism, Anarchism, Syndicalism. I'd consider myself a social democrat who believes in democracy in the workplace, like Richard Wolff advocates.

But socialists hate me. I never gave a fuck about reading "the real and true" orthodox socialist theory because nothing orthodox socialists ever demonstrated to me is anything other than; hatred towards opposing classes; actual devaluing of human life going all the way to killing the people they deem shitty people, as if each person is not their own culminations of experience and tendencies which dictates who they are, and to be against that would basically be against nature, which is silly.

Not only that, but fucking Lenin is a horrible writer, and every Leninist is a horrible person. Period.

Attached: giphy (1).gif (444x250, 1.24M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=uKUChOwam_M
youtube.com/watch?v=6ufkoN1hq1s
theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/07/are-socialists-physically-weak/533787/
reddit.com/r/ChapoTrapHouse/comments/begcfl/you_say_you_want_trans_cuties_threads_so_post_you/?st=JUMYNSRY&sh=f8c68a3c
books.google.de/books?id=iJZHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA78&lpg=PA78&dq=liberals more feminine&source=bl&ots=zK0VJ2F2W8&sig=ACfU3U1aM5I_3sMEPHSJQHYWgmPqdhmWFA&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiv36jM_NvgAhWQ2BQKHR1AAOw4ChDoATAGegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=liberals more feminine&f=false
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272716302201?via=ihub
cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/effects-of-physical-attractiveness-on-political-beliefs/D5214D0CAE37EE5947B7BF29762547EE
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23389425
scinapse.io/papers/2002037832
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/23/americans-views-on-masculinity-differ-by-party-gender-and-race/
nytimes.com/2019/04/20/us/politics/democrats-2020-white-male.html
youtube.com/watch?v=QON6SSMLcC8
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299519/
youtu.be/2rl0uD-UXaU
researchgate.net/publication/232463829_Wanted_More_race_realism_less_moralistic_fallacy
youtube.com/watch?v=4bcnO3VQ_fc
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_Elite
researchgate.net/publication/13981626_A_new_West_African_chimpanzee_subspecies
nature.com/articles/mp201185
mises.org/library/egalitarianism-and-elites
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

If you want to discuss politics, go to /pol/.

I'm talking about Karl Marx and Bertrand Russell, you retard. How about you go to poll. These writers wrote books, not went on a talk show to rant about how much jelly donuts they eat.

Shut the fuck up you astroturfing niggerloving newfaggot. You're exactly the type of vacuous self-aggrandizing cocksucker OP is describing and you know it. Go back to retarddit.

>How come socialists are always dumpy losers who act like the most morally superior dipshits?
not a question about literature
rude

Based
Lol btfod cringe tranny

>basically be against nature, which is silly
I'm sure your life is all about doing what is perfectly natural

>I'd consider myself a social democrat who believes in democracy in the workplace
you are a closet liberal, nothing wrong with that, but you are not a socialist. that's okay, socialism is cancer. either call yourself a communist and read so much Marx you can btfo any socialist/leninist you meet or join the "social democrats" who are just liberals who want capitalism with a human face

you sound lovely and not like dumpy loser

social democracy and liberalism have completely different aesthetics
youtube.com/watch?v=uKUChOwam_M