All is absolute, nothing is relative

All is absolute, nothing is relative.

Attached: 41858545_343371306235268_7451498046343934621_n.jpg (1094x1167, 1.02M)

Other urls found in this thread:

vocaroo.com/i/s0MCBRUrqiGq
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

False. Moral isn't absolute, space isn't absolute, time isn't absolute.

Morals are in fact absolute

Yes but is the Relative Absolute or is it Relative? Beat you there fucking nerd haha

Why?

That’s just, like, your opinion, man.

Morality is based on benefit. There exists a certain action that will benefit you the most, but due to your lack of understanding, you may go down a different path.

Then certainly it's uniquely absolute for every single person, therefore absolutely relative

semantics

no that's what relative means. also we adjust the time dilation effect on satellites precisely because just about everything is relative

post reading list

Attached: tumblr_pq62nrbazl1vjov3vo1_540.jpg (519x644, 116K)

1. ONLY WHAT IS TRANSCENDENTAL IS ABSOLUTE.

2. ALL ENTITIES WITHIN KOSMOS ARE IMPERFECT, THEREFORE, ARE NOT COMPLETE; WHAT IS INCOMPLETE HAS FACETS; WHAT HAS FACETS CAN BE VIEWED FROM MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES; WHAT HAS MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES IS RELATIVE TO OTHERS.

3. A BETTER FORMULATION OF YOUR STATEMENT WOULD BE: «WHAT IS IS ABSOLUTELY; WHAT BECOMES IS RELATIVELY.»

vocaroo.com/i/s0MCBRUrqiGq

both brainlets, read Kant

read Kierkegaard

READ HEGEL.

DO YOU SEE? ONE CAN DO THAT ALSO AS A RESPONSE, BUT SUCH RESPONSE IS NONARGUMENTAL, AND, ULTIMATELY, FUTILE.

I MADE A THREE «POINTS», AND EXPLICATED HOW YOUR STATEMENT IS FLAWED; IF YOU CANNOT COUNTERARGUE, IT IS BETTER TO ABSTAIN FROM RESPONDING.

Attached: ANGL FRWN.png (650x575, 1.43M)

Resume pls.

Your points are easy to destroy.

Attached: 1555915899199.jpg (750x723, 50K)

can we please just do for the trads what we did for the jews and deport them all to rhodesia or something

absolutely based and statuepilled

Fag

>nothing is relative
>nothing
Go back to Frogtwitter you fucking larping faggot.

>TRANSCENDENTAL
Doesn't exist, you're cowering away from reality. Next.

Attached: 1314025848149.jpg (640x480, 101K)

Kantian morality is about purposiveness, and it isn't about happiness.

>time isn't absolute.
First law

>DO YOU SEE?
(fa-get)FAG.GOT

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 10K)

>I don't know what "transcendental" means

it's not called that anymore you racist

>Morality is based on benefit
Are sociopaths the ultimate moralfags?

Wha' about me mum?

And all is me. I am absolute.

B A S E D
A
S
E
D

I’m sorry, was that supposed to be an argument of some sorts? Care to prove me wrong? Is it not the case that the most moral action you can do is that which benefits you the most? Why wouldn’t you do what benefits you the most? We might not know what benefits us the most, but that’s irrelevant.

>combining the absolute with relativism
Neo-absolutists are in for a bad time. You will not like what you release into the world.

What first law are you misinterpreting to say time is absolute? It isn't.

>vocaroo.com/i/s0MCBRUrqiGq

based Vocaroo poster

Attached: 1329965306893.jpg (680x680, 68K)

and it never will be

stay mad virgin trad

read Hegel then Kierkegaard faggot

not a /pol/tard but rhodesia was Based and was a nation of good men

Attached: NEETs.png (1280x720, 649K)

>There exists a certain action that will benefit you the most
That's relative to what you think is beneficial.