What youtubers do you watch lit ?

I read books. This is a literature board.

based

wow you're so special

He tries too hard and is a leftist.
He used to be the kind of guy who wrote stuff like "This but unuironically" and call people in comments "reddit".
Not to mention how self conscious he is.

BBC in our time podcasts are kino
they're all up on youtube and Melvin is fucking great. they invite the prominent scholars and authors on to discuss various historical and philosophical subjects

>Tries to hard
Nice meme
>and is a leftist
Meme-tier left/right-worldview
>Not to mention how self conscious he is
He says himself that he hasnt read some books others talk about so he does not address it in his videos.

No real critisism, only /pol/-tier slander. It's not like I cheer for this guy, quite the contrary, I'd like to see some contrapoints to his arguments, but there are none besides posts like this.

youtube.com/channel/UCEAn_gNN1ShcSyP65o6HLTA
philonotes is great

>John David Ebert
>John Vervaeke
>Jonathan Pageau
>Edward Dutton

E Michel Jones

I only watch one man and that is Matthewmatosis.

Based and Logospilled

Imagine being keanu reeves. Hes just a dude who found a way to make money. Then he became a meme. He had every loser hater faggot on reddit drag his name through the mud, for no reason other than to perpetuate a joke for the common people. (These are the same retards who post spongebob memes, anti-vaxxer memes, flat earth memes, abortion memes, environmental rape skeptic memes) these same drooling mouth-breathing imbeciles turned keanu into a somewhat contemptible person, so their fat, ignorant, low-class loser asses could feel better abour themselves. And hes just a dude with a job and a bike shop, and i cant imagine hownhe doesnt resent those retards.

He named his channel cuck philosophy and when he get called out for it he goes "LoL I made the joke for you, reddit ftw".
Makes serious Marxist analysis and meme worthy content.

If that's not trying too hard, what is ?

He is clearly a leftist, vegan, week soiiboy with a shaky voice .

He deleted that one Q&A video where he showed his face too long because he's self conscious.

He always goes for the low fruits by adressing only the most evident of Peterson's Errors, in fact he can't get his name of his mouth, just get over it ffs .
His arguments aren't wrong, they are the most down to earth, low effort points possible.

I don't have a problem with him per se but he is nothing like what is viewers portray him like, he's more like a scaredy little rodent.

>Ad hominem ad hominem ad hominem
Nice post, really made me feel enlightened about cuck philosophy
Do you regard his review of Hicks Postmodernism book flawed as well because he only addressed the low hanging fruit of Hicks completely misunderstanding Kant or is this tryhard for you?

I watch the book club but only because I want to sodomise you, Quentin

No that's what only an attention seeking pissant who doesn't value his time would do, cuck

Then & Now
Cuck Philosophy
Wisecrack
Zero Books

Arktos has some pretty good conversations

cooking channels
athlean-x

quite based and very comfy, I fall asleep to matosis/mauler vids

youtube.com/user/Krokgard/videos

What do you most like or would most want from Yea Forums-related videos? Not looking to make bank or even do this long-term, but I just finished a PhD in English and was thinking of spending some time over the summer making videos teaching about some of the stuff I found most interesting.

I never saw any lit tuber doing much more than telling the plot and some trivia about the author and maybe quoting some themes.

I would like to hear more about the style of the authors and analysis of some significant passages of the books.

I only use youtube to watch fancams of korean kpop girls.

Incoherent career-destroying Landian gibberish with strobe lights and nudity

Book youtubers:
youtube.com/channel/UCYejuNiTTA3yCxVSOTyj7yA
youtube.com/channel/UC7meg6KOPt_CRTLcEiy2lGg
youtube.com/channel/UCW5R53ckTBE4JJtUmc64lng
youtube.com/channel/UCaD73Etmm6tdpIeERoqe0HA
youtube.com/channel/UCyOuk8JnuDk2iScdzmNLVfg
youtube.com/channel/UCZhNeWiUOK4CX9OYsk6sGCQ

Attached: 50.jpg (250x243, 17K)

Pyrocynical and the Bookchemist

do you know the channel KrimsonRogue?
I want that, but with actual depth, and maybe more of a focus on good books rather than just bottom-of-the-barrel trash

Luke Smith
Father John Hollowell
potholer54

A bold premise.

Map Men
Cuck Philosophy
Contra
Philosophytube before he hopped on the spectacle train
Shaun
Hbomberguy
Beau of the Fifth Column -- no one watches this guy, nobody's fucking heard of him. He puts out a video almost every day. Consistently high-quality leftist analysis targeted at working class whites, with none of the "amazon workers must know how to address zirzelf" condescension

I am 28 years old. I am too old for YouTube.

>youtube
>podcasts

the mediums the message my man

Attached: small heada.png (645x729, 66K)

Pleb-tier. He thinks argument from contingency proves his God, uses a lot of ill-defined concepts like logos (everything he likes is logos and vice versa, without providing arguments for the claims). Also his claim that sexual liberation is a form of political control is argued very badly. He provides an example here and there which is kinda related to the claim (e.g. jewish palestinian porn broadcast), but never seems to get to the core of the claim, always circling around it. I've noticed other people say similar things about him too. To me he's basically Peterson 2.0, maybe a bit dumber, because as unoriginal and cunning as Peterson is, at least his arguments are clear most of the time. Good thing he's anti-semitic, so he'll never get as popular as Peterson.

based sophieposter

youtube.com/channel/UC-2rr91vVvIpAFq--8r7XNA

top comfy old lady

Would ABSOLUTELY watch. Bonus points if they review their own books.

Based

Sadler, TheReportOfTheWeek, videogamedunkey,

Attached: 1550157976834.jpg (361x361, 34K)

>He puts out a video almost every day. Consistently high-quality

There is no such thing as daily quality, he probably has as much insight as an average post on this site.

The mediums are not inherently shit, but they do favour producing shit.

You're still better off than this guy:

Absolutely cancer inducing

of course I'm better, my taste is superb

Cuck Reviews

Kill yourself

no onecan take issue with his research or conclutions so most people I've seen who ree are literally right wingers getting triggered over his name, which is one of the most hilarious reverse trolls I've ever seen considering the only reason he did it is every left wing youtube video gets about a thousand cuck comments from those same right wingers
oh never mind now they are calling him cringe and self-conscious

why dont you read his books instead of saying absolute divel ?

Schizotube coming in
>John Birch Society (surface level anti-masons)
>Dead Rabbit (/x/ user who researches some really obscure shit for the lulz)
>Truthstream Media (anti-transhumanism and things of that nature)
the next 4 I think are mainly christian but not completely just a strong bent sometimes, maybe not all of them
>Now You See TV
>AMTV
>End Times Productions
>Creepy Little Book
>Shaking My Head Too
>John Michael Godier (space autism)
>Secureteam10 (god tier schizo)
>TRUTHBETOLD IATTT (sports are fake)
>Static in the Attic (history is fake)
>The Corbett Report (everything is CIA, very well presented)
>Russianvids (mix of the above)

Attached: 1554413217167.jpg (576x472, 52K)

Like if cuck were the only insult we could come up with.
>"check mate right wingers, you can't call me a cuck if I did it myself"

By the way you called him cringe

You're also too old for Yea Forums but that doesn't seem to be stopping you

hickok45
murphey's muskets
capandball
weston's O&A archives
allenpalin
fortunecookie45lc
bishop robert barron

i only watch guitar stuff
team danish pete representing

Attached: 2nl4p7ww38111.jpg (1079x719, 128K)

>wisecrack
>hbomberguy
>shaun

Attached: CPxxt0I9dOW0pYGyB7jJ_wHnA8BdJnLC5M32tNg5_x8_2mEWo4ZTBTlP5nC7MhfCSVZUhkEWU_hl9sbGPpO_oZDSPVzjYFV6EIoq (500x255, 495K)