Everything he says about women was commonplace for thousands of years in male-dominated societies. Feminism is 100 years old and has led to a people who dont even have children
So unless all those men were miserable for millenia, Im going to go with what they said
>people who don't even have children
This was much more common in olden times than you seem to think it was.
'Were people miserble before?' is an extremely stupid argument by the way.
People before internet weren't miserable either, but most living in current age wouldn't want to go back to pre-internet age. It is called advancement.
>It is called advancement.
not everything that happens is advancement, sometimes it's just a mistake
It is not a mistake if no one wants it back
it's a mistake if the society stops having children and gets replaced by patriarchal outsiders with a high birth rate
That's not true at all. Systems adjust to their current states in a way that makes going back impossible. For example re-instituting slavery or banning women from the job market would collapse the economy in practice. Doesn't mean people wouldn't do it if the negative effects were somehow averted.
>Truth should not and does not lead someone to unhappiness.
based
It's a retarded argument. In practice any information can lead a person to almost any state.
Can someone give a rundown on this book?