Is there an objective way to view an art work? Can an art work be objectively better than another art work? For example, why are works like Hamlet, The Man Without Qualities, In Search of Lost Time better than YA schlock like Harry Potter?
Is there an objective way to view an art work? Can an art work be objectively better than another art work? For example...
Aaron Scott
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
twitter.com
Kayden Gray
Yes. Hamlet and In Search of Lost Time evoke more complex emotions than Harry Potter, unless you're a brainlet. Most people cannot spot exceptional anything and just revert to comfort.
Aiden Davis
Objectivity in human perception of objects doesnt exsist because there is no such thing as being un-biased. By merely existing we establish grounds, perceptions, and ideas exclusive to our train of thought which we then contrast with the world around us, aka we create a vision of something only we ourselves as individuals can see
Jacob Turner
Yes. True art:
youtu.be
Brayden Nguyen
uh
kids like sugar
producing sugar is pretty easily not the highest aim of mankind - I hope I don't need to demonstrate that....?
of course a great chef could pull of some artistry and blow the example, but you get my initial point, right? I mean, sometimes a lollipop and a blow job are just as shattering the Sistine...
question A and question B don't really fit. try again.
Evan Walker
Dominic Thompson
yes, but two hot dogs are more than one
Jacob Davis
>Is there an objective way to view an art work?
Yes. it's just analyzing it from the intended subject. You can get stuff out of art by viewing though incorrect lens, but the meaning is distinct from the artist and simply something you came up with yourself using the art as inspiration. You can obviously just be wrong in your analysis.
David Sullivan
Very good response, and I mean this sincerely.
Jacob Thomas
I believe this technique is called SUBJECTIVITY