Aphorisms

It's also the first letter of "spaghetti."

I dont get it

Only one letter separates "age" from "cage."

It's the first letter of "children."

key-key-key-key-key-key-key

Can we trade this one for Stefan Karl back?

My grandma sucked my dick

And I did not cuum

very kafkaesque

We do not despise all those with vices, but we do despise all those without a single virtue.

For president: Bernie Sanders, never elected.

Very clever

The funny thing about the human language are the vast amount of coincidences. Like how "words" backwards is "swords."
Really makes you think.

>philosopher

>never published a scholarly article
>masters degree
>YouTube videos every day

Pathetic lmao

he's pretty based though as he also identifies as the most popular/successful philosopher on the internet. He sincerely says "i'm kind of a big deal" in a context where anyone with an ounce of dread for social normalcy would try to project themselves as very humble.

>This guy unironically self-identifies as a philosopher

Very correct, user. Only published articles in respected journals can be philosophy, nothing else. Philosophy has nothing to do with communicating directly to people, only other philosophers.

> more people will read and be influenced by Stefan's tweets than literally ANYONE on this board
> except maybe Tommy P

"Good" without "God" is 0.

Only one letter separates a white man who sniggers from being branded a nazi.

It's the first letter of "semite"

based

if only what he communicates wasn't such drivel and garbage

'In revenge and in love woman is more barbaric than man.'

Karl Pilkington > Stefan Molyneux

It's also the first letter of "Sharia." We need Jesus

how is molymeme so based and retarded?

Damn...

Only one letter separates anal from banal.

It's the first letter of buttsex.

not an argument

Dhammapada :)

Jesus and coming with a sword

"No need to elaborate works – merely say something that can be murmured in the ear of a drunkard or a dying man."

Attached: images (5).jpg (300x242, 14K)

It's also the first letter of... STEFAN!!!
WHAT IS THE ABSOLUTE MAD LAD IMPLYING EXACTLY?!?!

Attached: face-screaming-in-fear.png (256x256, 63K)

Only one letter separates "laughter" from "slaughter".

It's the first letter of "schwifty".

Attached: 522268_1.jpg (630x630, 63K)

No, but being reviewed by our peers of similar academic standing shows us the work stands up to scrutiny.

Molyneix is scrutinizes by high schoolers and that is all.

Attached: gs.jpg (1186x780, 495K)

Man proposes, and God disposes.

Attached: Ariosto.jpg (400x582, 65K)

Attached: dabbingonbrainlets.png (858x713, 237K)

Where's the lie though?

Attached: ppcy46B-2388.jpg (320x320, 75K)

>Shame is a response to the profanation of a mystery, which almost always occurs when one speaks of it, hence renders imperfectly in exterior and sensible form what is essentially interior and ineffable. Sex, for example, in its exterior visage, is little more than an act of animal copulation, but for a select few “refined souls” it possesses an interior profundity.

>There is a conflation which is very frequent in Western thought. One conflates the ego with the things which are often found to be in association with it, but which are nevertheless distinct from it, such as love, desire, pleasure, thought, etc. The psychic life of man can be broken down into a multitude of constituent parts, perhaps indefinitely so, and the ego is merely one part among many. It is the “ahamkara”, the sense of individual selfhood, that part of us which reflects upon itself and says “me” and “mine”. An ego-less desire is far from an inconceivable thing. It is a desire which is simply there, a “who-less” desire. By definition, every action performed by the man who “lacks” an ego is unegoistic, no matter how selfish it may appear.

>Denying the possibility of an unegoistic action, Friedrich Nietzsche asks, “How could the ego act without the ego?” (Human, All Too Human; aphorism 135). It cannot. Nietzsche’s error, however, consists in the false and baseless supposition that there must necessarily be an ego present. The ego, being something fundamentally illusory, flimsy, daydream-like, can be dissipated in the presence of sufficient clarity, and so an ego-less man is possible. However, unegoistic action is very far from resembling what moralist philosophers suppose it to be. One could just as well unegoistically commit a murder as unegoistically benefit someone. What such moralists designate as “unegoistic” is really counter-egoistic, that is, it consists in actions calculated to oppose the ego, and thus such actions also presuppose the presence of an ego and so cannot be truly “unegoistic”, which is a term of negation, denoting an absence, pure and simple. Caution is necessary here, for very frequently egoistic conduct clothes itself in a counter-egoistic garb. The only truly counter-egoistic acts, as Nietzsche himself notes in aphorism 139 of the same work, are those done in unconditional obedience to something outside oneself, whether a law or a spiritual guide (the Guru).

>Humor, particularly that of the ridiculous, the nonsensical, and the absurd, that is, the humor of the carnival, of the Saturnalia, is the domain of Dionysus-Shiva. Humor is a destructive act, but a sort of benign destruction. When subjected to humor, things cease to be what they formerly were—they are destroyed and yet they remain. In this respect, Shiva’s role as the trans-former (that is, the transcending or divesting of forms) appears under an interesting guise. Rather than the forms falling away, through humor it is the essence of things, or, rather, the essences we supposed to be there but which were in fact illusory, which flee from the forms, and the forms remain behind—only now they are cloud-like, empty of mass, no longer possessing gravity, no longer inspiring fear or respect. And so we laugh.

>The Ego is that which is always and only preoccupied with itself. It walks about, as it were, with a mirror in its dominant hand, and that is why it does everything badly. Efficiency, whether in action or contemplation, requires, first of all, that one forget oneself.

Attached: 468.gif (1215x1452, 421K)

A good memory is one trained to forget the trivial.

Attached: muhIQ.png (1080x1292, 605K)

ilenced

lost hard

so brave

IQ is a relevant factor. You'll laugh at your perceived foes if their group has