Refute him

youtube.com/watch?v=ohYRRiWvre0
This video sorta deconstructs his diversity harms social cohesion talking point, and it does so from a WN perspective which is all the more damning. Basically, poor immigrants = more crime, rich immigrants = less crime. Pretty consistent with race realism however

Let's see...
>everyone likes to live with their own race
The constant permanent immigration into white countries disproves this.
If you wanted a white ethno-state you'd have to remove non-whites by force (not necessarily violence). Because as much as they complain about whitey, at the end of the day they still want to live with whitey and they'd risk their life for it.

They don’t want to live with whitey. They want whitey’s welfare state.
Come on.

It's true that there are many factors which confound such studies (not the least of which is the unreliability and perceptual divergence of self-reporting).

The high prevalence of white flight and tendency of minorities to balkanize into their own neighbourhoods is solid evidence that most people are more comfortable around their own kind. This 'racial gravity' can't be explained away by economics and intelligence/skill metrics.

Taylor is subjected to Alex Jones levels of censorship, while a LARPish clown like Dickie Spencer is left unmolested.

Enough said.

Western whites have been aggressively indoctrinated to accept multi-racialism, and have been rendered generally sedate by material comfort. Subconsciously, most still prefer their own.

Not to mention pro-immigration parties consistently win elections across the West. Outside Eastern Europe meme democracies, nobody has ever run on an overtly racist ticket and won

very low IQ posts

Its not whitey they actually care about, (except maybe the women)

>I have no idea what a ghetto is

Are you sure it's just that, though?
Do abos think their women are the best?
Do blacks think their people are the most qualified to run a country?

What if certain races are in fact objectively* better at some things?
What if one of those "things" is the willingness of others to live near you or in your country?

*Based on what most people's opinion, I'm not making any metaphysical claims.

I'm not specifically talking about western whites, though. Even then, you have people who genuinely like Asians and whatnot.

>pro-immigration parties consistently win elections across the West.
Mostly true, but I wouldn't base much on that.
>nobody has ever run on an overtly racist ticket and won
Nazis and a few others did.
Overall IMO the vast majority of people (including those who vote pro-immigrant parties) are racist in the conventional sense. But it's simply hard to push explicit racism, especially nowadays. Certain forces are simply stronger and don't allow it.

Attached: aboriginals.jpg (500x379, 58K)

ass

>Overall IMO the vast majority of people (including those who vote pro-immigrant parties) are racist
Opinions are like arseholes, we've all got one. IMO the vast majority of people across the west find racism at best silly, and at worst abhorrent. White nationalists are either a laughing stock or deeply weird. Guys like Breivik or that aussie guy are considered ridiculous monsters
I think you are doing the usual racist's double think of assuming deep down everyone shares your neuroses

>Opinions are like arseholes, we've all got one
Get off the internet boomer

Well, how do you define racism or "a racist"? I think this is basically what separates us.
You probably think racism is when someone is "being mean", whereas I think racism is any race based discrimination (which means it's basically impossible to not be a racist).
Your definition is based on arbitrary feelings and ideological contexts, which is why I reject it.

>do abos think their women are the best
Yes, they actually do think that. It has everything to do with fear of their mother killing them and not because more attractive than white womens

>Your definition is based on arbitrary feelings and ideological contexts
As is yours.

My definition is usable for an intellectual discussion. Yours isn't, it's a political tool.

Not him, but so is yours. You want to define racism so everybody is a racist, so as to make your own racism acceptable. It's the logic of the man who beats his wife and justifies it to himself by believing every man is a misogynist.
As already pointed out, every time a party runs on an explicitly racist ticket, they get crushed at the ballot. The evidence suggest strongly that the majority of people don't hold racist views. Multiple surveys confirm this, and confirm the trend is only towards increased egalitarianism.
Racist views are the preserve of a small rump of people with no wider backing in society (though of course institutional racism remains as a factor)

Attached: bb8ic2qate-wa_cbgc2ifg.png (564x334, 20K)

If they have no wider backing how can they possibly have institutional power?

unqualified-reservations.org/2007/11/why-i-am-not-white-nationalist/

Attached: 1554735994483.jpg (619x572, 98K)

>You want to define racism so everybody is a racist, so as to make your own racism acceptable.
No, I want to define it so as to be able to talk about it in clear terms.
How do you define it?

Please explain how it's possible to notice two different things, but not have even the slightest preference towards one of them.

The changes to immigration policy were made with no popular support or discussion. Support grew ex post facto as the indoctrination, virtue signalling and minority activism kicked into high gear. Now younger generations who never knew racial homogeneity are coming of age, and populations of non-whites have grown considerably (where there is much support immigration for obvious reasons). You'll also note that the support is still far from broad (even today) for a policy which has such a profound impact.

Attached: D3vvP6DWsAINj8o.png (720x372, 35K)

People should have the freedom to live wherever, with whomever and race mix if they want to
Liberty>your white utopia

Think if this were about drugs and in a hypothethical scenario people would in mass become addicted, so much so that the entire structure of civilization would collapse. Would you still be in favor of people's liberty to consume this drug, knowing that it would create a world devoid of liberty?

It's funny that you're expressing a very naive and simplistic view of freedom and then mocking the supposed 'utopian' agenda of others. Am I 'free' to not pay taxes to support these policies I disagree with? Where is my freedom? Are like-minded whites free to develop white only townships (or keep their nations if demographics haven't changed much yet)? Liberty doesn't exist in a vacuum -- people's liberties impact those of eachother. I suspect you're quite selective about whose liberty you actually care about.

There was a time before...

youtube.com/watch?v=uTp8AAx8SE4

13% of the population, 52% of homicides.

Not racist to notice this but it’s pretty dumb to ignore it.

His ideas are a bit too simplistic and romantic. He's a boomer, dreaming about a world which is mostly gone.
Richard Spencer, for all his sperginess and bad optics, has a clearer vision of where things are headed and how power works.

Moldbug is redpilled as fuck.

Here's another--lower IQ but still relevant--blog post with the same title:
jack-donovan.com/axis/2017/05/why-i-am-not-a-white-nationalist/

Attached: 220px-Richard_b_spencer_cropped_retouched.jpg (220x295, 22K)

>It's funny that you're expressing a very naive and simplistic view of freedom and then mocking the supposed 'utopian' agenda of others.
Whataboutism
>Am I 'free' to not pay taxes to support these policies I disagree with? Where is my freedom?
You should be free not to pay taxes to things you disagree with
>Are like-minded whites free to develop white only townships
Again they should be

low criminality is not the same thing as social cohesion. If i lived in japan for example, i would probably feel alienated even though there is no crime

Maybe racist is too much of a loaded term. Use "ethnically conscious" or something like that

post a picture of yourself

I'm not a fan of redefining terms because they're "loaded". According to SJWs we're all irredeemable sinners anyway. You'd rather date women than men? Sexist. Young women over old ones? Ageist. And so on ad infinitum.

Racism is normal. It's only a problem if you're expressing it rudely, say if you call someone a nigger to his face.

>It's only a problem if you're expressing it rudely, say if you call someone a nigger to his face.
how is this significantly worse than other personal insults such as fat, short, dumb etc when they all have the same intent which is to upset the recipient?

>how is this significantly worse than other personal insults such as fat, short, dumb etc
It's not.
Although I'd make an exception for "fat", because that's usually something a person can change easily.

He can’t even understand Nietzsche

yeah, i get what you're saying. But if you frame things in more digestible ways, it's more likely that you will be able to exchange information with normies without triggering the Pavlovian conditioning they have been subjected to. Watch this: youtube.com/watch?v=fgReurGebJg

Attached: 1537005287918.png (235x283, 46K)

kek

>unqualified-reservations.org/2007/11/why-i-am-not-white-nationalist/
This reads like that OJ "If I did it" parody book.

>thinks Jews are white
WRONG

>i'm not a white nationalist because it's anti-semetic and i'm a Jew and jews dindu nothin

That's pretty much what Taylor says too, though.
He speaks against the State forcing people together against their will but also says that if they want to "race mix" voluntarily they should be allowed to do so.

Okay then I don't think I have any problems with him even tho I'm neither white nor do I think race mixing is that horrible

Dutch gov studies showed that people were more inclined to do crime (of any sort) if they lived in a mixed race neighbourhood, even if the participants were of high income groups.

Diversity in close proximity is unnatural and dangerous

Hey you! Guy standing in a corner there!
Fuck you!

..you hard yet, OP?

Forum for Democracy leader Thierry Baudett said the "party-kartel" (globalists) were busy with a policy for homeopathic thinning of the native population, and said that we must return to our Hyperborean heritage.

He became the largest party in the Netherlands last months provincial election, and is still growing in the polls.

Estonia has accepted the true estonian party in its goverment this month after electoral succes.

Lega rules Italy after last years massive victory

Law and justice rules Poland since smashing the leftist eu party a few years ago

Fidesz rules Hungary, up to 70% of the population supports orban.

Flemish nationalist are growing rapidly in Belgium, many muncipalities now completely barring refugees (eg oostende).

National revival (formerly fn) is growing tremendously in France after yellowvest, many islamic attacks and recently notre dam.

Farage's new brexit party got 26% in polls for EU election

SD is growing in Sweden, though femen socialists still hold power

Austria, denmark and Norway adopted harsher stances on immigration and/or formed governing coalitions with populist parties after populist electoral succes.

Vox (populi) is rising fast in Spain

Finns party growing in Finland.

Bulgarian right wing is growing rapidly. Bulgarian socialists are even more anti immigration than the right.

Greece has nazis on 20% and growing.

Whats left is Germany, with a growing afd and eastern cdu leaders telling merkel (their own party) is not welcome during their stay.

//
Leftist victories:

Slowakia, on an anti corruption campaign.

Attached: bronze-bust-of-seleucus-i-nicator-593278108-5899f4dc5f9b5874ee6485d6.jpg (768x975, 66K)

Also, alberta (canada's oil) province in canda had elections yesterday. Trudeaus ruling progressive party was defeated by United Conservatives party.

So other than Eastern Europe meme democracies, no white nationalist racist party has won an election? Thanks for confirming

>Italy
>Netherlands
>Belgium

Loonie lefties are truly the worst readers.

Furthermore, Bolsanaro won in Brazil, and he hates niggers.

Likud won (again) in Israel, but jews are racist to everyone I guess.

"Progessive" Leftism is a disease the world is immunizing itself against.