ITT: Philosophers you skipped
ITT: Philosophers you skipped
Jaxon Davis
Mason Walker
Kierkegaard
Bentley Mitchell
Austin Ross
The greeks.
Levi James
HOW DARE YOU?!
Chase Sanchez
Dewey was based but Charles Sanders Peirce was baseder.
Jack Robinson
Francis Bacon, Hume, Locke, Reid, Rousseau, Smith, Marx
I will skip Dewey, Chomsky, Camus, Singer, Althusser, Fuckoo, Badiou, Russel, and especially the completely unoriginal Wittgenstein who only feat is showing that the rest of the philosophers who praised him Didn't Start With the Greeks
Xavier Brown
why?
Robert Rivera
Schlolastics, analytics
The two ends of autistic spectrum
Blake Wood
Any of the postmodernists
Colton Murphy
Everyone after Aquinas
Aaron Powell
>skipping witty
It’ll be the curtains for you!
Isaac Bennett
I skipped him too along with several other anglos
I heard Dewey is becoming super fashionable among French academics. seems weird to me
Juan Cook
I'm trying to find translated books that are about reshaping yourself and about improving control of my body and mind that would be written by old Asian Masters with white hair and croaking voices that hold lots of wisdom. I want to combine Western and eastern philosophy but I don't want to read some regurgitated Hollywood garbage written by a stay at home mom.
Asher Robinson
Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, Marx, Kierkegaard, Russel
Currently reading Heidegger
Leo Davis
Read the stoics.
Blake White
that is weird
Colton Gray
based
Bentley Sanders
His language is unnecessarily dense for the kind of philosophy he’s doing, and the questions he’s trying to answer seem pretty inconsequential to any philosophical project of importance. He just seems like a distraction to me.
Ian Perry
You'll regret it.
Easton Powell
>of importance.
Clarify.
Justin Moore
> Pascal
> Fichte
> Wittgenstein
Landon Johnson
>Skip german idealists
>Skip Kierkegaard
>attempt to understand Heidegger
oh boy
Zachary Sanchez
Henry Ford?
Nathaniel Hill
out of all those only reaf hegel and marx and by marx i mean Capital I and alot of marxist study and Hediegger was cake.
Isaiah Foster
You can't mix chocolate and shit and expect shit to become edible. What happens is that You ruin the chocolate.
Robert Gutierrez
>out of all those only reaf hegel and marx and by marx i mean Capital I and alot of marxist study and Hediegger was cake.
heidegger owes more to schelling and kant than he does to marx or hegel. marx is even further down the list than hegel.
Julian Rogers
will probably be skipping augustine and the rest of the chr*stoids
Matthew Harris
same
Josiah Edwards
augustine is shit but you should read pascal and kierkegaard
Austin Wilson
can you give us a quick rundown on Dasien?
William Gray
>Reading Pascal and Kierkegaard without reading Augustine
Grayson Davis
>Skipping Hume
Imagine being this unbased
Noah Harris
Bless you based Peirce fan
Adam Sullivan
you don't need to read augustine in order to understand pascal and kierkegaard
Jack Walker
Deweyt
Camden Thomas
It's probably not the best way I'm sure but i am reading a fuckload of second literature, some books mention the familiarity with Kierkegaard's thought, others like Derrida make some comparisons with hegel.... I might not get the full extent of what deconstruction is but I think I got the rough idea, same thing with being and time that I've almost finished reading
Mason Reyes
Schopenhauer
Noah Morris
kek
Gavin Gomez
>i refuse to read things i THINK i disagree with because i know better
this is your brain on gay ass fucking retardation
Jose Fisher
Aristotle and Aquinas because Plato and Augustine.
You fool
Kayden Martin
read badiou's ethics, it is a short and interesting book