>determinism? No, I'm not a cuck of the universe
Determinism? No, I'm not a cuck of the universe
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>t. a bunch of atoms
next!
>t. coping weakling
Cope
have sex
>I'm not a cuck if I pretend the bull isn't there
not how it works bud
>coping atomlet
you know those people who say that they think it would be "arrogant to assume that out of all the planets in the universe we are the only one with intelligent life"
I don't like those people. It's such a copout answer. You can just tell even when they say it, they say it like they're reading from a script. They don't believe it, they're just trying to convince themselves they believe it.
>implying that labelling something has any bearing on the nature of that thing
Calling reality a bunch of atoms isn’t as profound a statement as you think, it reveals nothing of the universe since we defined an atom as being a part of the universe. Therefore just as many properties can exist within the atom as without the atom.
this is your brain on reductionism
virgin attractors vs chad entropy
fuckin destroyed lmao
>>implying that labelling something has any bearing on the nature of that thing
Umm ackshually sweaty, it does irl
en.m.wikipedia.org
Occasionalism is the thinking mans cosmology
You're just stating a bunch of ad hominems, refute the claim
You have this backwards. Gigachad is a normie reddit atheist determinist who laughs at your existential angst.
Your mind does not control reality, tranny.
based and redpilled
Degenerate catamite - out.
>haha idiot you ackshyually can’t know nuffin
Got'em good
You only have free will if you can control your desires and drives. If you are able to overcome the sex drive, you will be free. Otherwise, you will be a slave for the rest of your days, to be set off by the next passing stimulus.
materialist nerds need to stop making metaphysical assumptions about the nature of reality outside of experience and LEAVE
But mathematically it would have to be impossible wouldn’t it?
>he thinks his will is an uncaused cause
Absolutely not
You've got a major case of observer selection bias (survivorship bias)
Doesn't matter how unlikely intelligent life is, it would always observe itself which is why it says nothing about the likelihood of life in general
How can I stop thinking with my dick? 100% serious. I am desperate
>You can just tell even when they say it, they say it like they're reading from a script
Why are so many people like this, Yea Forums?