I think what that user was implying was that the access to a mentor, not necessarily the location itself is the main thing.
I've recently begun a practice of doing a "personal retreat" every Saturday. Essentially trying to follow the guidelines set forth here (see bottom for schedule) dhamma.org/en-US/about/code
My experience in brief:
1. It's very difficult to resist the temptation of entertainment or distraction because your computer/phone are right there. My advice is to actually hide them, at least in the beginning.
2. It's very important to maintain awareness (or at least try) throughout the whole day, from the moment you wake, to the moment you fall asleep, not just during the meditation itself
3. It's equally important to mix sitting with walking meditation and to keep maximum times to about 90 minutes per session. Beyond that there are diminishing returns.
4. It's extremely important to temper expectations and minimize friction (related to my other post ) so that unwholesome emotional states don't get coupled with what should be a purely neutral activity (remember also that even samatha and jhana are not the same as vipassana, that they are useful for reversing the feedback loop in your favor, but must eventually be let go, for full awakening)
Sure. The first solution is based on research done by BJ Fogg. In brief the model describes habituation as a three step process:
Trigger: A prompt must tell a person to “do this behavior now.”
Motivation: A person must have sufficient Motivation when the Trigger occurs. Three core motivators exist: Sensation (pleasure/pain), Anticipation (hope/fear), and Belonging (acceptance/rejection)
Ability: The person must have the Ability to perform the behavior when the Trigger occurs.
Note that motivation and ability are inversely (and exponentially) correlated. i.e The harder something is to do, the more motivation required to make a habit out of it. Put another way, the harder something is, the more likely it is that negative emotional states will become associated with that activity, creating the undesirable feedback loop I talked about before.
Practically this means that difficulty should be minimized as much as possible, to the point where you have a neutral or positive emotional state toward the activity. In other words, make it easier to do it, than to not do it. The paradox here is that, although the activity you may want has a much higher desired intensity for an end goal, a minimal intensity is far more effective at reaching that goal than starting with an equivalent or lesser intensity.
An example will make things clear. (see next post)