Have you overcome your Anima complex yet Yea Forums? Surely you don't suppress the feminine parts of your personality...

Have you overcome your Anima complex yet Yea Forums? Surely you don't suppress the feminine parts of your personality. You don't want to develop an obsession to traps do you? Also Jung thread

Attached: Screen_Shot_20190312_at_1.54.57_AM.png (1149x666, 801K)

Jung, Carl. Dislike him. It is the alchemical Jung that is the most interesting and that presents the most affinities with schizoanalysis. It is in the books on alchemy (which stem from his « breakdown », as Jung himself always emphasised) that we see all the animal becomings and molecular processes that Deleuze and Guattari discussed. Jung was very clear that alchemy is not just in the texts but is ongoing in our individual and collective psyches, and that dream imagery and artistic productions (painting, literature, we can add cinema) are the privileged workshop and observatory of the psychic (= « desiring », in Deleuzian language) production.

This picture is gay anime shit man. :3

No women or heterosexual men on this board like gay anime shit.

Is there a psychological explanatin as to why biological girls who like anime are such damaged people?

They relate to the stereotypical anime girl. Do the math.

This post is High Octane

Why do people obsess over all these strawman images? What useful point is there to make, saying:

'my political opponents are disgusting and subhuman'

and not even citing an example but making a caricature?

Imagine being this much of a newfaggot that you percieve everything that happens on this website as a war between /pol/ and everyone else. That image has anime figurines and a PHD in computer science on it. You are on Yea Forums(nel). You realize there are people on /k/ who have $20,000 (at least) worth of guns, who dress up in mascot outfits and shove dragon dildos and mosin nagant bolts up each others asses? And they're perfectly okay with this and make fun of it. You need to go back.

'My political opponents are disgusting and subhuman' can be true. Strawmen caricatures are obviously not true.

I was in the fucking dragon-dildo personal defence thread, btw.

hit a little too close to home?

basically nobody is disgusting and subhuman, just some people are (embodying) evil

>obsess
It's just funny desu. The fact that these people exist and take themselves seriously is hilarious.

How do I stop jerking it to traps? There is definitely something wrong with me.

I turned my anima into a tulpa

>no no you don't understand, I -must- bitch and deconstruct this self-aware weeaboo picture
kill yourself

read the bible, pray the rosary/prayer rope, say the hourly prayers of Saint John Chrysostom
repent

As long as you do not become your own erotic focus, don't worry

>tfw no discord tranny gf

Unironically thinking of doing this

I'm still wrestling with my Anima and no literature I've read so far on the subject seems to offer a satisfactory solution other than "repress it" or "become trans".

I suppress the feminine parts of my character solely because there'd be so much at stake socially if I displayed them openly.

It sucks, but I've reserved myself to being effeminate privately while only letting a small but socially acceptable fraction of my girlier characteristics show in public. And no, becoming trans is not a solution to this problem, since it's not quite the same as being a real woman.

>thinks OP is about anime
Is anyone a doctor? I think I just laughed up a lung.

He's already jacking off to masculinised images. Too late. Narcissism == homosexuality.

Integrating your Anima is about learning to deal with emotions, not hanging around pick-up joints in a short skirt.

Yes, but it also has to do with your perception of femininity. Needless to say, if I'm expressing a strong obsession with the feminine, then I'm still wrestling with it.

My feminine side isn't in harmony with my masculine side. Rather, it's expressing a desire to take over me. Reconciliation to the point where I can integrate my femininity into my life without compromising my present existence is exactly the dilemma I'm facing.

Find a (productive) outlet for that part of you. Realize you are more than just that outlet. Profit.

it was probably made by a discord tranny. Even as someone on hormones i don't want to be seen as one of these gross cookie cutter fetishists. straight men shouldn't be allowed to take hormones

Normal people live rent free in your head

Everything feminine is utterly alien to me. I like tomboys because it's like fucking one of your bros but not gay. I've been jacking it to MtF transformation hentai on and off for the past year or so. The transformation aspect isn't what turns me on, it's the profound sense of sexual shame that I find relatable on a level that I am deeply uncomfortable with.

God I wish I was a robot.

Attached: 2816617_p0.jpg (1072x790, 281K)

Me and butterfly ruined this board :3

They weren’t ready for a woman doing something awesome for a man?! Seriously you guys

I mean I go on and on, but I’ve had women want to drink my cum etc etc

Women do AMAZING THINGS for men you guys. Women are actually very awesome, I think what our point was is that we’d rather SHOW you, as opposed to explain. There’s no point in being a fucking loser and sitting around saying every single woman is evil simply because your unrequited love doesn’t return the affection.

robots are the most girly thing there is

Not even what it is. Fuck that worthless brainlet and his stupid archetypes. Sexuality is purely material and trap obsession stems from a lack of sexual experiences and consequent objectification of and alienation from one's own body. It is that simple. Jung couldn't even steal ideas properly.

How? They're big, strong,metal and logical

I fucked a lot of girls but nothing compares to a feminine penis and boyclit

FROM THE FUTURE

Attached: 9781788731577-4f24c93871d376efaf059ac12bc3811c.jpg (450x728, 115K)

The lack of sexual experiences isn't the necessary antecedent. In many cases it's overexposure to pornography, or a mix of the two (porn compensating for real sex). But in any event there are empirical reasons that can be determined, there doesn't need to be any appeal to a nonsense "collective unconscious" or archetypes banging around in our brains like schizophrenic poltergeister

im always saddened by the fact that it feels embedded into my core that i must be such a stoic in others perceptions of me. sometimes i can forget about it, but my base reaction to most situations is to mimic my father. but even as i type this and im thinking about my dad, i see a strong stable man and have never shaken that perception even though i know the chained innards of such a guy.

Same. I actually think this is what part of my desire to be feminine stems from. I hate the fact that I default to being stone cold and stoic even when I want to express emotion. I was probably equally as emotional as a woman is stereotypically seen as when I was a kid (and probably still am internally), but years of social hazing and bullying has made me scared to express my feelings—I even used to have some girlier mannerisms too.

I also think being surrounded by women all my life and the fact that I’ve had good experiences with the vast majority of them has made me love femininity more than masculinity too.

I know masculinity isn’t all bad, but it just doesn’t feel right that I’m outwardly perceived as manly and intimidating when my inner self is so sensitive and girly.

Consider the fact that stereotypical male behavior is often derided as something to be suppressed. That it is inherently destructive. It can be, but the barrage of cultural stamping on certain aspects of male behavior and glorification of femininity in general in public discourse has an effect on your unconscious value judgements and identity. You want to be "good" and associate feminine responses as inherently superior. Feminism in general has lead to a role model homogenization where cultural heroes are supposed to represent everyone men, women, white, black etc. Its literally driving people crazy. See /pol/, sjw, trump style fear mongering. All this racial discussion and virtue signaling feedback looping into insanity. This transgender movement is not normal human behavior that is suddenly just not being repressed, at least not at this scale. Routes for "masculine" ambition to be fulfilled are basically non-existant. You can go be a wage slave, doing mind numbing work with no sense of anything creative or real in the work. Your wife can leave you for whatever reason whenever she wants and take your things and your children. Wtf are you even allowed to own in this world today? What can't be taken from you at a moments notice? Some picture from 20 years pops up of questionable political correctness and your career is done. Anything big like a house is on credit (or rent) if you aren't 1% and the rest gets vacuumed out by manufactored needs invented by advertisers. It's so unbelievably fucked.

I don’t think that’s the issue in my case. It’s true that masculine outlets are dwindling, but I still find ways to indulge masculine interests (I’m interested in guns and historical weaponry for example). Even then, I don’t think femininity is praised in our current society. Rather, women are encouraged to be more masculine (work yourself to death, emotion is for the weak etc.).

I don’t even necessarily see the feminine as more “good” than masculinity, I just see it as more appealing and true to who I really am. I wouldn’t necessarily classify myself as trans either— I’m AGP at the very most.

Like I’ve said, the problem I face is that I feel TOO masculine to the point where I’m sacrificing my humanity. Any girliness and sensitivity I displayed was ridiculed very quickly to the point where I feel I don’t have an outlet for that part of my character. If anything, there are basically no outlets in society for men who want to feel fem unless you count MtF trans groups.

This stereotypical masculinity is, ironically, an expression of femininity. The overindulgence in the feeling (and effort not to), the impulsiveness, all the behaviours that do not originate from virtuous will.
So who, then, is the truly masculine? The Philosopher.

Attached: 1551900852439.jpg (768x828, 106K)

The Masculine & the Feminine come in two aspects: the physical and the spiritual. The latter is contrived, whereas the former is not. The spiritual mystique is derived from a projection of a caricature of the physical mystique into a concrete form. The physical exists, the spiritual is derived from appearances. All we have is the appearances of forms, and we derive the True from this. I look to myself--I see the physical masculine mystique. But what of the spiritual? It is actually the conglomeration of products, advertisements and capital--the appearances have worked their way into my psyche and make the mystique of gender seem to be something more than it actually is. I associate the feminine mystique with certain attributes which are actually derived from the culture at large. I also associate the masculine mystique with their special attributes. But both of the attributes are derived. Thus, the act of believing in the spiritual elements of a "gender" is actually a reflection of culture into a set of physical attributes. Transgenderism, as I understand it, is a product to be sold. 1/?

"How," the neo-liberal capitalist asks, "Can we derive profit from the physical aspects of a being?" Well, the answer is simple--there are two main groups of humans which have very distinct physical attributes: male and female. Now this can be turned into a tool by which to exploit the public at large, and extract a greater amount of value from them. By splitting the public into these groups, we can associate a certain appearance that ought to be designated to them which exploits and accentuates the physical characteristics of the group to a hyperbolic degree. Thus arises commodity-gender fetishism. Commodity fetishism is when the product attains a greater, somewhat metaphysical, value that is greater than its overall use-value, because we associate the commodity with a certain identity or aspect of being. Now that we have marketed commodities to specific genders, there now exists commodity-gender fetishism. This is a specific type of commodity fetishism in which the appearance of an object is associated with a gender (because of marketing), and exploits the now disparate anima and animus of the human being in question in order to sell them a product. 2/?

Now what does this have to do with transgenderism? Simply put, it is the association of gender-specific commodities with an animal force. The commodity extracts certain characteristics of the feminine or masculine, exaggerates them, and then sells them to the specific gender. But what of the person, who, through some means, begins to understand themselves through commodities? They begin to see themselves in the commodities, the commodities make up their way and meaning of life, how they see themselves, how others see them. The commodities shape their life. And so we generally have exaggerated feminine and masculine dymorphism. And what if the person in question isn't comfortable with the portrayal of the dymorphism in society, what if they don't see themselves in the commodity? Well, they might see themselves in the opposing aspect of the commodity even more, or they might not find themselves within the commodity at all. The latter spawns the philosopher, artist or scientist, who has arisen above the need for commodity fetishism, the former spawns the transgender person, a human being so caught up within commodity fetishism that they degrade themselves to the level of a thing, a person to be bought or sold. 3/3

ITT: No one including the OP having any idea what the anima is yet still trying to write multiple paragraphs about it

Also, just a tip: it has nothing to do with "a more feminine part of you" or "being feminine" or anything like it. Yes most people on Yea Forums have a raging anima complex but this is not it.

Then what is it? I understand it to be a symbolic form of the feminine mystique as to be found in dreams.

Jung said that men can survive the almost complete destruction of the feminine parts between the ages of 25 and 35 and should become "real men" and only later (re-)integrate the Anima so they don't become too grouchy when old. I got this from book 9/1. Not an expert on the whole Jung or his views on the sexes tho.

it is a universal archetype derived from the "primitive family" and not a part of your personality. To "integrate" the anima is not to act feminine but to recognize its actions and influences in your subconscious mind. Anima is literally your image of your mother. Anima is the feminine "godess". It influences your behaviour in a way that makes you more antisocial, emotionally sensitive, insecure, and generally at odds with the "real world". It makes you feel protected. Look up "oxum" in brazilian folk religion. Also literally think about your mother. What youre seeing is the anima.

So mommyposters are the truly integrated ones