>The world is the totality of facts, not of
things.
Can I get a source on that you fucking idiot?
The world is the totality of facts, not of
Brody Turner
Carson Sanchez
What does he even mean?
Blake Young
Can I get a source that the world has a "divine purpose"? It's kinda strange how all the divine reflect human beings, it's almost as if human beings made all of it up. Hmmm.
Adam Cox
This is a troll right? Its self evident
Jeremiah Sanchez
No its not
Easton Hill
Wittgenstein was poking fun of philosophy for its prosperity for making grandiose and baseless claims which will be cited and asserted as facts later on.
Chase Lopez
> what is an axiom
You should stick to Sam Harris and Deepak Chopra
Anthony Ross
why would undivine beings in an undivine world imagine something like the divine in the first place?
Parker Cox
autism
Nicholas Foster
as a source of solace and image of constancy in a dangerous and protean world
Lincoln Reed
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. A figure of fun. Loathe him. Vile deceit. Picture theory of language is charlatanic, and satanic, nonsense.
Nicholas Gray
>Can I get a source on that
How about reading his work you galaxy brainlet ffs
Nathaniel Bennett
What grounds an axiom?
Jack Jenkins
Wittgenstein, Ludwig . Dislike him. Second-rate, ephemeral, puffed-up. A nonentity, means absolutely nothing to me. Awful.
Sebastian Barnes
>i give no sources, for it is indifferent to me whether what i have thought has already been thought before by another
Cooper Watson
>means absolutely nothing to me
>writes this about him
cringe
Michael White
if you cant understand wittgenstein, then philosophy is not your forte
Jason Perez
Holy shit it’d be nice if literally anyone on this board read Kant, Frege, and Russell before discussing pic related. You’re all subhuman retrds when you try to wrestle with “muh profound thinkers” who have specific historical contexts. This is a non-issue for anyone remotely prepared to engage with Wittgnstein.
Bentley Cooper
to make them think they are divine, obviously.
David Mitchell
Metaphysics can't find out what the world is made of, cause everything is actually made up of something else. So how can you describe the world when you don't even know what it's made up of, well wittgenstein thought that facts were unchanging. The rules of the world don't change. Therefore, facts make up the world.
Dominic Wood
but don't some things have facts?
Chase Moore
The Münchhausen trilemma