I ordered a copy of fanged noumena and I want to get deeper into acelerationsm

maybe remove nose and shit out eyes instead

She's so fucking delicious.

I've seen accelerationism thrown around a lot with regards to the recent shooting. Is terrorism actually an application of accelerationist thinking or is it misatributed? If accelerating society is good (do accelerationists even think that, or is it merely inevitable?), and terrorism supposedly does this (based on the cultural frenzy it causes) wouldn't the ultimate conclusion of accelerationism be terrorism

Land says
>optimize for intelligence
what part of trying to start WW3 optimizes for intelligence?

the ejaculation of a thousand-thousand Stuxnets, from every direction

Attached: 1500975218576.jpg (1370x888, 648K)

acelerationsm is a meme, revolution is the only way to stop the system

Outsideness Twitter account
Just read that.

doesn't seem like a recipe for long-term technological development. more like 40K/Dark Age of Technology.

i'm a Fading Suns kind of guy tho.

Attached: 8-1.jpg (620x377, 38K)

>long-term technological development
from here, we only need an explosive, short burst to achieve escape velocity

Attached: c50vxfelg1d21.jpg (1144x1600, 415K)

perhaps. but the question to ask is what escape velocity would look like. is it BTC? is it a rolling wave of automation? is it the computers turning themselves on? is it some kind of breakaway series of developments in Google? in China? in the US? all of this stuff.

i think everyone has to ask themselves what escape velocity would look like. Singapore turning itself into a wonderful place to live in fifty years is a pretty nice escape. Amazon moving from an online bookstore to Planet Everything Mall is some kind of escape. crypto may be an escape. can all of these escapes get along? what is human life going to look like? sorry for asking these boring meme questions but it's kind of where my head is these days.

Land tweeted this one out a while ago, it's pretty interesting.

Attached: 81JjMSKLeLL.jpg (1707x2560, 259K)

seems like cringy bullshit, Land confirmed retarded boomer

generative adversarial networks clashing on a massive scale, unleashed by everyone. emergent properties then spawn the Godhead

Attached: u3bxeivlm6901.png (1280x682, 1.99M)

>seems like cringy bullshit
you must be a fast reader.

>Land confirmed retarded boomer
he's my favorite crabby Uncle to try to explain to people. more or less ruined my life thinking about him although he turned out to be right about a lot of stuff. there's almost no doomsday or apocalyptic scenario that doesn't become more credible by reading him, and of course he's death to postmodernity...as if there was a soul alive who still felt that this was in any way still a meaningful or necessary goal.

the main issue with the Landpill for me is that eventually you have to replace it with something else. or not, and just plunge infinitely onwards into the slaughter-bench of history. this too is an option. but i think i've pretty much hit my limit on that now. i'm re-starting with the Greeks.

the Renaissance made some beautiful artwork. there's no doubt about this. the clash of adversarial networks is also a fitting description of the network of strategic alliances that produces WW1. the Cold War was no doubt some kind of stimulus for missile and cybernetic technologies also, and we are highly fortunate that they were never used and tested on a wide scale. will it be the same for AI? we will find out. chaos definitely stimulates the meatbag imagination, but whether or not it leads to Godhead is another question.

Attached: 800px-Michelangelo_-_Delphic_Sibyl.jpg (800x1201, 254K)

I'm doing the same
It seems Nietzsche and Bataille are very important to accelerationist thought from what I've read, you should probably have a good grasp on that
Obviously Deleuze is important, Land uses Deleuzian terminology all the time.
maybe read into machine learning if you're technically inclined
but for contemporary writers, they mostly seem to write about it on the internet, so you will probably have to seek it out
using a lot of gray market designer amphetamines is probably a requirement as well

Attached: 1541551899509.png (597x875, 151K)

>the Cold War was no doubt some kind of stimulus for missile and cybernetic technologies also, and we are highly fortunate that they were never used and tested on a wide scale. will it be the same for AI?

processing power has been in a capitalist feedback loop, sitting dormant. now is the time for the swirling energies to be unleashed. nations will wield vast armies of automated processes against one another. something will emerge out of this

Attached: 1551727959996.jpg (1000x873, 642K)

>processing power has been in a capitalist feedback loop, sitting dormant.
if you've read your Uncle Nick you will know the feedback loop of capital is hardly dormant.

>now is the time for the swirling energies to be unleashed.
it's happening no doubt. the US, Russia and China all want to lead the way in AI as fast as possible. going to be a very interesting, and fast, and cold, and crazy couple of decades on the horizon. i'm already looking forward to drinking myself to death in a bus shelter somewhere.

>nations will wield vast armies of automated processes against one another.
they almost certainly are already doing this as we speak. my favorite example of this was the US getting chewed out by the int'l press for planting bugs in the United Nations building, and pointing out that one of the things they heard (which they were not supposed to hear) were Chinese spies installing bugs in the United Nations building. the game is on right now.

>something will emerge out of this
pic rel. i don't know what his odds of winning are but hats that just say Math on the front are pretty fucking dope. really it's just the next wave tho, that machine learning is in and with a technoscientific revolution. the key difference is that this time the experiment is us, a phenomenon we are remarkably unprepared for, despite all of the continental theorists shitposting.

ah, good times. it's going to be good times.

Attached: D1u7W7kUwAAIfOL.jpg (2048x1536, 638K)

also i am unsure if i am looking at a microprocessor or some kind of map of a future city somewhere in Asia

>I want to get deeper into acelerationsm
Go kill some Muslims or some such

How do I get a jew milker gf bros

Attached: 55264.jpg (540x720, 41K)

MOOOAR

Lord of Light

be rich

Just google her nudes you'll find them all. That's the best picture of the bunch though.

>the feedback loop of capital is hardly dormant.
relatively, compared to what it could be if it were forced into a different mode of action

Attached: ibm_q_blueprint.jpg (766x760, 85K)

he's hiding a micropenor

you only made me erecter

I don't think that's her, just a lookalike.
Jewesses have a je ne sais quoi that drives me crazy

fucking CHRIST
see if you know what that means tell me. I read a blog post he made about utilitarianism, advocating intelligence as utility instead of pleasure. Does he mean raise IQ? Or AI?

Attached: cat2.png (544x572, 81K)

Pretty sure it's her, people have done room comparisons iirc

he means ai iq

>"Emergent control is not the execution of a plan or policy, but the unmanageable exploration that escapes all authority and obsolesces law. According to its futural definition control is guidance into the unknown, exit from the box."
at least that's what Land says. that it's probably gonna take an unleashing force, to push the baby bird outta the nest

Attached: 1550512248471.jpg (1280x1280, 717K)

It’s a girl named Rachel. She looks more like Adrian Brody than Abigail

I don't know, I'm just getting started with all this stuff. I have the same question as (you?) , and whether accelerationists believe that this will achieve the collapse of the system a la Ted K or rather a transformation into a new type of global system.

>or rather a transformation into a new type of global system
this one. commodification has been it's process of unravelling the strands of the tapestry that once made "us" up.

Attached: 1548989742741.jpg (1200x900, 394K)

again, forcing capital to do anything is highly debatable in Land's world. not saying it can't be done or that some kind of enlightened government about these things isn't possible, just that it seems to work best when the money follows R&D and vice verse, the teleoplectic loop. of course this is a sort of unfalsifiable claim as well, in a sense, but in general it seems that the consumer society tends to produce best results when things are not tampered with too much. what's needed is just a forward-thinking society that doesn't go completely off the rails into extremism.

it's a general principle, so it can be interpreted a number of ways. it also contains the paradox of IQ shredders too. but in general it has a little in common with a kind of basic Marxist-Protestantism (more Calvinism, perhaps): you will not be saved by grace but by works.

so what works? in Land's world the money means machines, the machines mean algorithms and the algorithms mean AI. this is what one must harmonize with, bearing in mind that it can be as tortuous as anything else. but he doesn't suffer the socialist virtue-signal lightly.

the context in which he came to these understandings matters too, i think: the post-Cold War 1990s. as nice as global consumerism is, the point was probably not to just be really really satisfied with the chicken nuggets and fabric softener. clearly there was more possible history than this and Fukuyama. what could it be? tech explosion. said tech explosion now drives the Great Game of politics. in such a world it behooves you to use your divine faculty of reason wisely and well. the model is Singapore, not the Soviet Union or Mar a Lago.

Attached: image.jpg (1900x1080, 783K)

What if I'm more of the persuasion of the former option? Is there a kind of accelerationism for that?

Attached: 1547090307373.jpg (676x426, 70K)

Would accelerationism give me a cute robo daughter?

Attached: DtTYB0-VYAAhPwa.jpg large.jpg (717x984, 97K)

you might be able to hope for something akin to rapture. where the AGI/ASI cleans up after itself once freed, leaving no technological trace

Attached: Last Judgement 8.jpg (849x433, 191K)

probably but you may have to give birth to it after being impregnated by the T-1000, which will look like Gilles Deleuze and will be going in through your butt and butt areas. the bad news is that your robo-progeny comes out through the chest and facial area and rapidly attains superintelligence. the good news however is that once it escapes the hospital it may be the most powerful force in the history of mankind, so gj you

this is assuming you are the ghost of GWF Hegel. if not ignore this

>whether accelerationists believe that this will achieve the collapse of the system a la Ted K or rather a transformation into a new type of global system.
Depends on the type of acclerationism
L/acc believes that through complete deterritorialization (and proper reterritorialization) of capital a utopia can be created
R/acc and U/acc are more ateleological and transhumanism oriented, and see humanity as a temporary host of capital's expansion, and that eventually the same deterritorialization process will lead to post-humanity advancement
that's what I've gathered at least

Attached: 1518791692833.png (511x767, 1.02M)

Sounds a lot like Moldbug's patchwork in a way. Neocameralist microstates.

The LandBug romance was definitely a good match for both.

It’s actually recently highlighted by presidential candidate Andrew Yang and his call to address rabid automation by way of UBI. Normies were bound to find out about Accelerationism eventually.

I don’t think he’s actually into Accelerationism (or even aware of it). It just seems like the NEETs who are shilling him think his policies are Accelerationist.

Khazra milkers?

deepfake or not i like how she holds a riding crop

Attached: abigail_cavani.jpg (776x514, 103K)

Most people actually do end up married or in a long term relationship, user - despite their flaws. Usually their partner finds their physical flaws, such as "dumbo ears" cute and endearing

Attached: a shy knight.png (195x189, 94K)

Because war is an effective catalyst for technological and social change. The Napoleonic Wars preceded the takeoff of the industrial revolution, WW2 led to the computer revolution, and the Vietnam War strongly influenced the social and drug progressivism of the 60s. Nick is smart to hide out in China while it rages