Elite political knowledge

more like this, /lit?

penningtonlibrary.com/reading-lists

or

bactra.org/notebooks/

i want access to more academic/expert/cultivated reading lists that deal with power and politics. so far these two guys offer the best reading lists i've come across--where does /lit find their obscure/elite political knowledge?

Attached: political-art_schmertzleroccupypoliticsjpg-4534962d6a8564d0.jpg (1632x1212, 894K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/List_of_important_publications_in_philosophy.html
docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/mobilebasic?pli=1
polisci.uoregon.edu/comprehensive-exam-reading-lists/
youtube.com/watch?v=YgADKpMStts
bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis
bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/78691781-c9b7-30a0-9a0a-3ff76e8bfe58
bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/93073500-9459-3bbb-a3e5-cde7a1cc2559
bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/44122901-c2e8-34f5-93e0-d4402c163966
bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/9849ae28-a4f7-3020-995f-1d07c4250d7a
monoskop.org/Monoskop
monoskop.org/images/1/1b/Blast_1.pdf
monoskop.org/images/0/09/Brand_Stewart_Whole_Earth_Catalog_Fall_1968.pdf
monoskop.org/images/f/f1/CCRU_Abstract_Culture_Digital_Hyperstition_1999.pdf
suzannetreister.net/HEXEN2/TAROT_COL/HEXEN_2_TAROT.html
radicalsoftware.org/volume1nr3/pdf/VOLUME1NR3_art01.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=CgmQJfDkYCA
twitter.com/AnonBabble

First, read Foucault alongside primary sources. It is mandatory if you do not want to lose it entirely. Reading exclusively primary sources takes its toil. There is NOTHING to ready you for the insanity that ensues a good and deeper reading into the nature of our society. Which is why you must ground yourself in Foucault.

I am quite familiar with the CIA after almost a decade of investigation. I've came up with a saying to summarize it all:
There no CIA agents, only reagents.
It is crucial to understand what it means. Philosophy died and it was replaced by the CIA. All these statements sound schizophrenic at best, but there is no way around it. The way power operates is newish and our psyche have not fully reached the next cultural development milestone to comprehend and apprehend the innerworkings of the so-called ruling institutions. "Elite political knowledge" as you put it, is unexplainable as of right now. It is an entirely new philosophical paradigm, a raw concoction of occult esoteric knowledge, scientifism(?), dialectic... See? It already does not make sense. Most of these *cannot* be reconciled, to our juvenile psyche that is. The concotion will turn into a delicate nectar eventually, once it had the time to decant. I wish I was more articulate, english isn't my native tongue too, because this particular topic has infinite, unexplored depth to it. You want to dive into it? Foucault and CIA declassified papers is the first step. I would highly recommend going for declassified shit about a topic you are interested in, which is how I got into the CIA in the first place. I was big into counter-culture, psych rock, huxley and drugs when I was a teen. Then I moved on to psychiatry, psychology, behaviorism.. all that jazz. All of these can be traced back to the CIA.

Keep in mind; There are no CIA agent, only reagents.

Someone posted a thread with a pic about an user who was deep into CIA reading about a week ago. Didn't have time to reply as it was deleted, I couldn't find it in the catalogue. So there are probably other Yea Forums users who are knowledgeable on this topic.

Seek help.

I understand your concerns, but I am a 150iq student at the most prestigious literary school in France, so I'm think I'm doing fine kek. If you expected someone talking about the CIA and how power operates in our society to make sense, you are entirey misguided. I'm pretty sure the first greeks to come up with philosophical concepts were seen as complete looneys, which is inevitable really. Most of these concepts must have been quite juvenile in their interpretations too. Only pretentious and cowardly people like yourself dare not approach unexplored concepts and try to bring sense out of them. While you enjoy the comfort of your sterilized academic field of choice, exchanging with your most gentle and domesticated intellectual friends, I would rather dive into the unexplored and misunderstood parts of our society.

>He thinks politics writes itself. He thinks neoliberalism consciously assembles itself
cute

>prestige
>French academia
>pick one

Somebody post that +100 image collection of a public library which holds arcane knowledge, we Yea Forumsplebs aren't worth of!

You seem to have a warped perspective and way of thinking. Your post implies that you perceive academia as forbidden or secret knowledge. And, that you fetishize the obscure.

It would perhaps be best to find an actual teacher since you are likely to misinterpret or misunderstand philosophy and social science in a potentially harmful way. But, since you're going to be looking for material, you might as well expose yourself to the following, rather than schizo ramblings, to avoid you culturing memetic hazards.

General philosophy (including political philosophy):
ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/List_of_important_publications_in_philosophy.html

Yea Forums Philosophy Project:
docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/mobilebasic?pli=1

Example Academic Reading List:
polisci.uoregon.edu/comprehensive-exam-reading-lists/

True patrician class
Thank you for the window

Are you talking about DC user?