You guys shit on pic related all the time so now give me 3 (three) books that will allow me to understand and speak...

Have you considered seeking out the services of a prostitute? They take your money in return for sexual acts and perversions.

based

read it featured NPC democracy avant la lettre
it featured marxist revolution but not by workers but by bitter underemployed overeducated middle class kids that fancy themselves a vanguard elite
it featured creative desctruction and disruption of paradigms by radical technological progress
it featured companies and corporations as monopolies, and rejects classical perfect competition

schumpeter was ahead of the game.

unironically Smith, Ricardo, Marx; gonna shill for von Mises too. After that read whoever among the Austrians and Public Choice guys that you can tolerate. If you want to read about shit like the federal reserve or money market funds you aren't actually going to learn anything, only end up a clueless policy wonk. There's nothing about 'modern' economies that basic neoclassical principals fail to capture. Just know that technology is driving transaction costs further and further down.

slave and fleshpilled
even if you got what you wanted, you would still be a slave.
>look much better than normal, had multple women
>gave it all up and renounced the flesh

Thanks for the recommendations. Will these help me understand the economic policies of the upcoming US presidential candidates?

If you're short on time and care about the economic impact of policy X just read some Ricardo and then look into public choice theory and contemporary scholarship if you have jstor access.

mein kampf
12 rules for life
the history of the peloponnesian war

probably not. nobody has a clue what will happen as of yet. friedman wrote a little bit on UBI though if u yanggang, and some other austrian autists can´t think of the names now.

Attached: BwnZYeRIcAATjLW.jpg (600x450, 40K)

a levels cambridge economics

That feeling when you touch your dick and realize, though rather long and stiff, you will never put it inside a girl's flesh - a girl will never appreciate it.

Is pic related the book you're referring to? It was the only one by Ricardo I could find on amazon.

Any specific recs for public choice theory?

Attached: 91xa1jl8JpL._AC_UL436_.jpg (291x436, 26K)

Read this is you want to educate boomers who are still clinging to Reaganism or Thatcherism.

Attached: image.jpg (324x499, 21K)

INCEL (LITERALLY)
VOCEL GANG

Wealth of nations
Principals of political economy and taxation
An essay on the principle of population

>oh no debt comes due

Good job pretending to be the adult in the room.

Cringe and bluepilled.
Redpilled is fomenting jingoism in order to invade other countries for their resources to pay for your ambitious social programs.
I look at the Middle East and say, now those countries treasuries and oil profits could easily pay for what the west needs and then some.
The reason we don't do it is because we are week.

Pardon?

You can just look up a list of textbooks that unis want econ majors to buy.

Macroeconomics by Mankiw
Intermediate Microeconomics by Varian
Economic Theory in Retrospect by Blaug

Saudi Arabia is not nearly rich enough to fund the West's cavernous maw. They and the Gulf states are only rich because they have small populations.

Besides, our governments would fuck it up so that the profit-making war would cost money overall. Can you imagine trying to control 30 million Wahhabi fanatics, outraged that you've taken the TWO HOLIEST CITIES IN ISLAM? Not to mention the other 1.2 Billion muslims.

This is literally what Bin Laden was trying to get us to do, overreact and destroy our civilization fighting 20% of the world population

Here is a pretty good sequence for people who dont want to use numbers (i.e., you guys)

1. Basic Economics or Economics in one lesson (the free market is always right)
2. 23 Things they dont tell you about capitalism (the free market may not always be right
3. The Big Short
4. And the weak suffer what they must? (history of the EU and trade balance)
5. Adults in the room (politics behind the economics)

I say sequence but really its some books ive read that I have found helpful.

>Redpilled is fomenting jingoism in order to invade other countries for their resources to pay for your ambitious social programs.
>I look at the Middle East and say, now those countries treasuries and oil profits could easily pay for what the west needs and then some.
Have you heard about the military industrial complex? Have you heard about the modern form of tribute, in return for which the recipient countries get to buy american made military goods, and also get the benefit of employing americans and relying on america unless they want their military to stop functioning? Not only do americans get paid for this, they also get to employ their own population, and maintain an industry vital in keeping everyone else subjugated and fearful of american dominance, without having to spend a single cent to govern millions of disenfranchised muslims.

>The reason we don't do it is because we are week.
Yes, "week". You are simply a brainlet, too stupid to see how the world works. Good luck with your wars of conquest and blatant extraction of resources, the actual people in power are intelligent enough to realize that such an approach is simply moronic.

>And the weak suffer what they must?
Is this worth reading? I like Varoufakis because he seems to be pretty based, but I am not sure if his book is just fishing for anti-establishment sympathy or if it actually presents a strong and reasoned case.

Everything varoufakis writes is well written and engaging but for a relative layman like me, it can be confusing. He almost talks about trade imbalances as if theyre bombing campaigns. I enjoyed it but remember little apart from that

OP here, my background is actually in math so a math based approached would be welcome as well, even preferred.

I was thinking about reading Case Fair Oster "Principles of Macroeconomics". I don't know anything about economics but I'mn very interested. Anyone here knows this book that can give me feedback?

Maybe this

Attached: 1552000821596.jpg (4112x2064, 1.69M)

Man, Economy, and State cover to cover and you will perfectly understand economy

>Start with Wealth of Nations;
>Get into Keynes
>...?

what was the book on the deleted post?

You can DIP into Keynes, but do realize he is a meme. There are certain tropes relevant to higher intellectual thought, and these tropes simply make it so that someone can either appear intelligent or actually be intelligent. And either of these are indiscernible to the naked eye.

But if you are even a little educated you immediately see Keynes as a fool, he constantly confuses terms in the book, everything. I have a whole book written with corrections.
:3

Attached: image.jpg (4032x3024, 2.58M)

I haven't read him but I had economics classes at my uni and my teacher mentioned Keynes, can you give me an example as to why he is such a fool. Wasn't he an influence on the subject?

the fact that this chart literally just recommends "das kapital" without clarifying if it means vol. 1 or all 3 volumes makes me weary

"Schumpeter´s Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy"

the entire field of academic economics is fools, all the way through it, he's just one of the more luminous fools.

Not true at all. There are a lot of very intelligent economists. I could point you in a good direction if you want. Are you into mathematics or do you like literary economics?

Yeah I just did. But nothing is black and white, obviously there is some good and bad in everything. I give Keynes the same grade I give Hayek: three out of five stars. They both wrote OK works, that’s simply all.

There are some great ideas and some just generally speaking ill-formulated terms for both economists. If you want a good literary economist, Henry George is remarkable, and his theories were vilified years later by mathematical economists within the Lausanne school of economics

Mathematics

thanks

Cool, try Irving Fishers work, he is fascinating. I’m gearing up to re-read his work on the Interest Rate someday.

The entirety of the Lausanne school is nice.

Pareto dealt with utility. So did Von Neumann. Von Neumann linearized utility, giving it a set numerical value. You’re getting into a real science if you go the hard mathematics route of economics, but it’s useful to know a little bit of math anyway.

Pareto’s utility curves function as a sort of ‘black-hole’ in an N-dimensional hyperspace, where N is the number of commodities being analyzed. Von Neumann’s N-dimensional hyperspaces involve the N-dimensions as being the amount of players. So there’s the difference. They both deal with hyperspace, but Pareto’s resembles particle physics (as does Irving Fisher and anyone else who attempts to mathematize subjective utility), and Von Neumann’s.... well he made a new science up completely, so once you define utility as being a set amount, you kind of create a discrete science there.

Fascinating read though, it’s incredible what you can discover through just thinking about a societal / economic problem. You’ll discover tactics the participants will use definitively a certain percentage of the time (I.e. a strategy). But of course you can. Under his system, utility is not subjective.

That’s somewhat of a judgment call, but it helps to analyze everything under the two systems.

Oh yeah and if you want a literary work check the post above

Look up some actual economics 101 textbook so you'll learn supply & demand, price mechanism, division of labour, what growth is and so on. Usually not many pages, you get used one for a few bucks and at most some simple formulas and many nice graphs to look at.