I will not have the internet for a while can anyone post their favourite philosophy books that i may download

I will not have the internet for a while can anyone post their favourite philosophy books that i may download.

Attached: 1550704639480.png (200x194, 21K)

Attached: Start_with_the_greeks.jpg (3672x3024, 1.38M)

>The presocratics
>Complete works of plato
>Complete works of aristotle
>Enneads
>The bible (KJV)
>Summa theologica
Wow, now you're done with philosophy. Nothing worthwhile happened afterwards. God job!

Attached: image.jpg (1845x625, 269K)

Being and Time.

All good recommendations

You forgot Saint Augustin. Saint François de Sales and Saint John of the Cross are also pretty based.

>not Saint François d'Assise

Attached: image.jpg (3648x2736, 1.8M)

>only reading dead old white people
This is why we don't have aliens yet.

>Saint François d'Assise
not a doctor of the Church

Yeah that's why he wrote one of the most beautiful poems of all time.

Apostol Calc

Attached: sci.jpg (1277x2052, 627K)

>The Presocratics
>Plato's Meno, Crito, Apology, Phaedo, Republic, Laws, Parmenides, Timaeus
>Aristotle's Organon, Physics, Parts of Animals, Nic. Ethics, De Anima, Metaphysics, Politics.
>Boethius- The Consolations of Philosophy

quads of truth

Ego and Its Own. The first part ("Human") where he talks about the development of human culture and compares it to a child turning into a man can be a bit boring to get through, but part 2 ("Me") is great, like really. Stirner is like an unspooked buddha. The book is pure empowerment and gives you inward peace without stifling your ability to fist-fuck your enemies.

>development of human culture
is that all you got from it, brainlet? Stirner critiques the ideal of 'Man', demonstrates how it enslaves the individual, critiques the state, political liberalism, socialism, etc. the first half is a diagnosis; the latter is the cure.

>is that all you got from it
No dude, I just intended to put a different stress on it. It's my property after all and I use it any way I want to, not something to hold sacred itself.

Stirner and Voltaires Candide is the ultimate redpill.

Plato - Apology, Euthyphro, Meno, Symposium, Phaedrus, Parmenides, The Statesman, Timaeus.
Aristotle - Nicomachean Ethics - books VII and XI of Metaphysics
St. Augustine - The City of God
Boethius - The Consolation of Philosophy
Leibniz - Monadology
Hume - Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals
Kant - Critique of Pure Reason (Discipline and Canon of Pure Reason), Critique of Judgement
Fichte - The Vocation of Man
Hegel - The Phenomenology of Spirit
Wittgenstein - Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Note: The sections I highlighted are the ones that I like the most, but anybody who reads those works should read them in full, not in part only.

t. guy who is totally going to get aorund to actually reading those soon

Aquinas didn't come up with anything. He just recycled arguments from Aristotle, and applied them onto Mediaeval Christian church dogma.
St. Augustine is a much more innovative thinker, in regards to his theology.
I'd suggest anybody to skip St. Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologiae, and to substitute it for Epicurus' two letters, Epictetus' Discourses, and Sextus Empiricus' Outlines of Pyrrhonism if they'd honestly rather learn more about the various kinds of ways in which the world can be viewed or thought of as.

Any reason for those specific books of Metaphysics? I tried reading it before and gave up.

Yikes!

I think you have the wrong state of mind trying to value a philosopher based on how much he "came up with." If you asked Plato, Porphyry, Plotinus, or any of the other Platonists or Pythagoreans, they would all say that their thought was not original to them. I'd even go so far as to say that vast majority of ancient philosophy held these same thoughts regarding anonymity and originality of ideas. Regardless, Aquinas is still very laudable for his incorporation of Aristotle's thought into society that was dominated by Platonic thought regarding theology.

Garbage-tier post, my dude.

plato republic, epictetus discourses, seneca letters, kant critique of pure reason, nietzsche zarathustra, and on a far lighter note antifragile

The Ego and Its Own
Fear and Trembling
Either/Or
The World as Will and Representation

>St. Augustine is a much more innovative thinker, in regards to his theology

Oh yeah because a circular argument that gets BTFO'd by some autistic german dude is totally innovative

Is any of you able to suggest non-memes FOR ONCE?

Holy shit.

>everything I don't like is a meme

Attached: 1538894150946.png (680x661, 262K)

Low quality post. Shame with the energy your parents and teachers invested in you.

>hurr durr philosophy i dont like is bad!

i see no virtue in obscure recommendations when my true favorites are what you call "memes." OP asks for favorites and favorites OP gets.

I'm pretty sure you mean Saint Anselm

>don't like
Kek no, I like everything you posted, but holy fucking frigging shit, it's the same handful of titles posted over and over again every single day, do you want to turn Yea Forums into Yea Forums? And to be honest, most of it is not even the best philosophy you can find out there. Plato, okay, Aristotle, okay, Nietzsche, okay, Kant, okay, Hegel, okay. Good, good. But what about Iamblichus? What about Lucretius? And Plotinus? Confucius? Laozi? The Hermetic Corpus? Giordano Bruno? Dogen? Nicholas of Cusa? All of these are GOD-TIER philosophers, but sadly you don't know them, so you feel entitled to mention the same two or three memes you've always seen on books. But that's exactly like listening to mainstream music. Most of the greatest stuff remains obscure.

Peace and love bros

Attached: image.jpg (1181x1696, 491K)

You're right to chastise us, with such reading under your belt. You should descend from the mountains, o user, and speak of these non-meme favorites. Create new memes for us all. Share your love. Abandon this hipster posturing

>kjv
no

Attached: 5E6C94A2-A678-4BA7-AF62-BB0DD641FA16.jpg (333x499, 32K)