Choose

choose

a) Peterson
b) Taleb
c) Peterson vs Taleb
d) Peterson vs Taleb on Rogan
e) Peterson vs Taleb on Rogan's drugs
f) kys OP
g) Harris
h) none of the above
i) none of the above on Rogan's drugs
j) write-in

Attached: 34534543543.png (614x166, 36K)

eceleb eceleb
go away
off my board
you shouldnt stay

you think youre smart
or maybe poignant
but you are not
fuck you cunt

f

Attached: 1547864860118.jpg (588x391, 51K)

Name-calling isn't really justified unless it's backed by a defensible reason. Peterson might have violated this at times, but making accusations of this nature should be considered a serious charge, in which, if only in respect to those well-meaning people who think otherwise, they should be explained. Furthermore, it establishes the precedent that you are more interested in expressing your conclusions than giving your opinions. Also, as you do not justify your opinions on reasonable ground, or any grounds at all, you do nothing to obviate the charge of unreasonable dogmatism and intolerance.

It is very unlikely that this charge could be justified, and there seems to be a perverse inversion in regards to name-calling, in which the worse, and more insulting the epithet, the more liberally and baselessly it is shared.

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-03-08 at 3.36.40 AM.png (772x694, 153K)

nice, although i want to see Taleb btfo Sam Harris, i can´t stand his smugness

Taleb is a pseud destroyer. unfortunately, it's a thankless position that causes you to take on tendencies of the people you destroy. when the last pseud has been annihilated, Taleb will then have to destroy himself for his mission to be complete.

we´ll see if his ego is larger than his integrity

x) Your Lord and saviour, Jesus Christ

he will fold his keyboard and barbell into a plow.
tilling the earth and remembering fondly his days of glory, but vowing never to return to them.