Given what strong emotions it evokes, why are there so few books on pedophilia and pedophiles?

the complexity is not in sexual gratification. sexual gratification is simple.

human relationships are not, and you can not divorce sex from intimacy and trust

>intimacy
>trust
and you cannot seriously expect anyone to believe children are not capable of those basic things they do all the time.

children have a relationship of intimacy and trust with their parents, and in the ideal case this is something the parents have earned. that does not mean that the children understand what intimacy entails and under which conditions they can and should be trusting, and to what extent, just like a child can lie, but not know when it is sensible to do so.

we don't let children ruin their own lives but protect them until they have reached a level of maturity where they are able to learn how to shoulder the full responsibility of adult life.

>we don't let children ruin their own lives
and you think this is a good thing?
we ruin children's lives for them without ever letting them have a choice in the matter.

both not giving children any choices, not giving them a framework of safety are forms of tyranny. proper parenting starts out as mostly nurturing and then increasingly exposes the child to challenges that build up in scope and difficulty. sexuality is one of the most complex things to get right, so it shouldn't be tackled prematurely.

>sexuality is one of the most complex things to get right
you sure this isn't just your PoV based on a culture which gave you next to zero sexual agency growing up? and more than likely kept you unbelievable ignorant?

Your concern for a child's agency is a thin mask you hide behind in order to justify your own inappropriate desires. It'd be worrying if not for the fact that pretty much everyone can see through it and recognize you for the creep that you are. Your presumption to be able to portray a child's sexual agency (which is of course, unformed and thus limited) really speaks volumes about your own perverted psychology. Please publish, because I think a pedophile's LARPing as a small girl would have value to clinicians and policy makers.

>being used by adults who should know better than to facilitate your childish delusions is sexual agency

Attached: smugge.jpg (509x481, 86K)

and further.... based on what you've written there it sounds like you're describing a world in which parents have sex with their children or in some other way encourage parentally supervised sexual exploration....... which of course is not something you endorse at all.

>a culture which gave you next to zero sexual agency growing up?
This is a bald faced lie. Children by and large are given agency to explore sexuality through low risk behaviors such as masturbation, kissing, and laws generally excuse sexual contact between minors.
>kept you unbelievable ignorant?
Another horrid strawman. Sex Ed classes are widespread. Our culture is full of media about sex. And also, some of us had parents who took their responsibility of raising capable informed children seriously.

Fuck off pedo.

That's a weird projection. I didn't read it that way at all.

So Mr Smith, how is your resocialisation coming along?

Fine Sir, my pedo book is almost finished! Want to read some saucy scenes I finished last week?

See you next year, Mr Smith

oh ok..... our culture is totally nailing it when it comes to striking a good balance between protection and agency
reason.com/archives/2018/04/09/there-are-too-many-kids-on-the

>old enough to die in a warzone
>not old enough to fuck in a porno

Attached: There_Are_Too_Many_Kids_on_the_Sex_Offender_Registry_-_Reason.com_-_2019-03-08_08.21.43.png (754x378, 17K)

Your article is discussing sexual assault between minors. Perhaps those kids shouldn't be on the sex offender registry, but nonconsentual sexual contact should be punished. Although, I can't say I'm surprised that a pedo is unable to distinguish between consentual sex and assualt.

14 year olds aren't allowed in the military, you dipshit.

You see, pedos suffer from magical thinking. For some reason, he pretends that 8 year old are deployed in war zones. Probably to justify his lust kiddies, and paint them as adults with agency. Pedos do that, they even ascribe agency to animals. kek

Maybe he's Muslim? I know they different ideas about child soldiers and sex with children.

this desu, it's presumptious to judge muslim culture by our western standards

Sadly, pedofags are generally IQlet so they can't transcribe their experiences.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17634757

18 to serve in the military
21 to serve in porno

>increased rates of non-right-handedness
i guess they really are 'sinister'

>only source of data is convicted criminals
>low IQ
you don't say?

Hold on, so all those videos of "barely legal 18 year olds" I've seen were lying to my face?

You can join at 17 with a parent's signature and there is no federal law saying you need to be 21 to do porn. I assume that's some Calicuck law and you just assume it's federal.

Bundy was convicted and he was high iq :)

No, not in the US at least. Maybe in the UK or other parts of the world, maybe. Idk.

Statistical studies of psychopaths have shown that on the whole they are of slightly below average IQ. Gary Ridgway has in IQ of 82 and he almost got away with over three times as many murders as Bundy. Criminals in general have lower IQ since criminality correlates with poor education, poor nourishment during upbringing, low socioeconomic status, etc.

The exception that proves the rule; most delinquents that don't dabble on white collar crime tend to be retards. That's why the smart ones get so much attention; they are stand out from the norm.

In other words, individuals
who score higher on measures of psychopathic traits, ASPD, and CD traits tend to score
lower on measures of intelligence.

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/100693v3

Ok, thats true.

Ted K, Bernie Madoff, Shkreli

If you can write a book as beautiful as Lolita then I'm sure no one will mind what it's about.

Shkreli was litigated. Also, did nothing wrong.

Parents ruin their children's lives all the time without repercussions.

If you think touching a penis once is more harmful than growing go morbidly obese then you are a fucking moron.

Lolita is about tyranny, not paedophilia.

You can change your weight by changing your eating, if you're eating your feelings you're just as messed up asomeone who was involved in a seriously lopsided sexual relationship in their youth. In fact, kids that are molested or even people in their 20s who take a run at a teacher or a superior at work, can end up eating their feelings and dying of it.

Leave the kids alone.

This. Nabokov's dad was killed in Berlin by russian fascists, then Nabokov got to live through the rise of the the Third Reich.
Fuck are you going to tell him about tyranny?

How low IQ are you?

Since i'm rebuking a post claiming that sexual contact as a minor is less abusive than a fattening diet, a post that also claims anyone who thinks differently is a moron, then i'm pretty sure i'm not that low IQ at all.

many people seem to believe that lolita is a book that advocates pedophilia even though it really does the opposite. the main character likes lolita because he was irreversibly traumatized by his childhood crush. his fascination with her is an anomaly. additionally, he is not a good person. his actions ultimately corrupt her life and she ends up in a much worse situation than if she had never met him

i also want to add that lolita is more of a slice-of-life story than anything else. to say that its theme is solely pedophilia wouldn't be right.

>many people seem to believe that lolita is a book that advocates pedophilia
these "people" are just retarded soccer moms who think writing about a subject means you approve of said subject. Everyone on the planet knows Lolita is just babby's first unreliable narrator.

Because it's so taboo. Nobody wants to read about that shit except the few antisocial degenerates that inhabit this website

Not everyone who has read Lolita is a degenerate though.

Because so few people are pedophiles.

>some fucking degenerate turbo bully that is 2 years older than you hold you down while planting his ass on your face
Yeah, these people deserve everything they get.

>corrupt her life and she ends up in a much worse situation than if she had never met him
She is married and has children with what seems to be an alright working man.