What will happen when automation replaces everything some time in tbis century? is stuff like ubi inevitable...

what will happen when automation replaces everything some time in tbis century? is stuff like ubi inevitable? what will become of art and literature? will robots replace humans in making literature? the world is already a cultureless intellectual wasteland how much worse will it get?
youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU

Attached: 1545579948601.jpg (789x750, 94K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=_AErscKnG4g
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

The elites will take off into the stars while the little people will fight to death for resources

They are going to nuke Saturn, turning it into a second Sun, which will pulse explosive radiation that will wipe out a significant portion of remaining humans in a mass ritual sacrifice while they have either descended safely into underground bunkers where they then further their eugenics program of perfecting the human race and evolving into the next stage or will have already left the planet either through space travel or having uploaded their consciousness into machines which then left the Earth.

>wipe out a significant portion of remaining humans
... There are easier ways to do this, without opening pandora's box on the planet. Just sayin'.

With the availability of tech we will always have art and literature user. The problem isn’t culture, the problem is the internet and distribution. There’s no sense of a cohesive social identity, movies are basically the last things left and they’ve had to broaden and expand their content so much to catch eyeballs that they’re shit. White kids cling on to rap because it’s popular, pop music is more popular than ever because what’s the use of art if you can’t share it with other people? People stopped talking about novels, it isn’t part of the cultural lexicon. That’s only because there’s an excess of entertainment even without the internet. There’s just so much to do.

I think it provides the metaphysical exchange of ritual sacrifice for power and immortality which more efficient means may not be able to achieve.

Might see a reverse immigration wave. Qualified workers flooding out of advanced countries as their jobs are automated away. As far as culture goes, authenticity and attention are rapidly being realized as commodities in their own right.

Our fathers, grandfathers and great grandfathers could've kept the farmer lifestyle and avoided this impending predicament. I wish I was Varg's neighbor or something.

Attached: 1537417220587.jpg (960x534, 134K)

lots of porn. unironically

Nuking Saturn wouldn't kickstart fusion. You can't turn Saturn or Jupiter into suns unless you increase their mass by an order of magnitude, and even if you found that much mass (which would have to come from another solar system) and brought it here, you're talking several million years before things condense into a star and fusion starts. During that time Earth would burn away to nothing, whether you hide in a bunker or not.
The technology required to turn Saturn into a star would be so cartoonishly advanced that it would be able to easily solve any scarcity on earth, and would require so much infrastructure that a human population hundreds of times our own size would have to be in space already doing this. Literally the only possible way this happens is if 99.9% of humanity left Earth already and is devoting all of their time and energy to killing the tiny minority left on our home planet in one of the least efficient ways possible. Which would be hilarious, somebody should write that novel.

humanity will hopefully capitulate and give space for superior robotic beings to continue to advance and spread civilization while humans resort to living like inferior hedonistic animals no different from apes.

Bump

things have to get a lot worse before they get better.
robots can't make art though

>robots can't make art though
youtube.com/watch?v=_AErscKnG4g

Bump

Robots can (or could) imitate human art to the point that robot art could become indistinguishable from human art. However, robots, no matter how advanced, can't create new aesthetics. For example a robot-writer in the 70s could write the perfect adventure novel by analyzing and absorbing an inordinate amount of adventure novels, however the same robot could never have written Gravity's Rainbow.

i agree robots can copy & put together based on formulas but i'm talking in the sense that there's more to art than that. like picasso said 'it's not what the artist does that counts, but what he is.'

>'it's not what the artist does that counts, but what he is.'
what a narcissist god damn

well everyone's a narcissist.
he went on to say
>Cézanne would never have interested me if he had lived and thought like Jaques-Emile Blanche, even if the apple he had painted had been ten times more beautiful

Humanitiesfags will be ETERNALLY btfo

he says on the literature board

Somebody has, Arthur C Clarke wrote a sequel to 2001 and called it 2010.

>everyone's a narcissist
only narcissists believe this