Lol maybe the curtains were just frickin blue!

>lol maybe the curtains were just frickin blue!
post opinions that guarantee someone is sub-70 IQ

Attached: 154456.jpg (600x515, 229K)

Just be straightforward with what you’re trying to say: you believe it’s intelligent to try to find meaning in an author’s description of something.

True.

Do I believe in IQ though?

No.

So, sage

It was more a comment borne out of hearing it straight from the mouth of a fellow literature student I'm dating. She isn't the first student to have repeated the same line, either.

IQ is a real thing, also, so there's little point in saying you don't believe in it. You can argue that its application as a viable score of someone's intelligence is questionable, but then I was being facetious in mentioning it in the first place - so the joke would be on you.

Its kidof sad that you are so much of a bitch that you had to make a passive aggressive thread about it

It’s kind of sad that your father didn’t wank you into a flannel instead of putting you in your fat whore of a mother’s womb

>i follow the hothead "phoenician"

did I offend you?

Attached: 478.png (1000x1000, 120K)

>everything the author writes had meaning
guaranteed sub-70 iq

>IQ is a real thing
It's by definition not a real thing. It's a measure that correlates highly and significantly with real things, but IQ itself is not real.

The measure, which is what I was referring to and is the only thing it could be, is very real. I really don’t care for your retarded semantics - go back to sucking off Taleb.

Yes, which is why I wish you’d never been born (much like your parents, I presume)