>IMDB - 7.1/10
>RT - 29%
ITT: Movies that demonstrate that RT is a piss awful review site.
Hard mode: nothing made in the past 5 years.
>IMDB - 7.1/10
>RT - 29%
ITT: Movies that demonstrate that RT is a piss awful review site.
Hard mode: nothing made in the past 5 years.
Percentage rating is shit. You can have 7.0 average movie with 30% RT rating and 6.5 movie with 80% score.
can you explain that shit to me? RT always confused me
Easily the most underrated sci-fi movie of the 90s. If it came out in 2009 and Nolan's name was attached to it people would be licking it's asshole.
Rotten Tomatoes is a piss poor site populated by plebs and paid shills masquerading as critics.
That didn't really clarify much if I'm honest
It shows percentage of reviews that rated the movie 6/10 or above. 5/10 movie is rated "rotten", must be 6/10 to get "fresh". And this is where is all goes into shit.
Imagine movie XYZ having 100 reviews. 80 of them rate a movie 5/10. 20 others give much higher score, lets say 9/10. Now the movie will end up with 20% and average score slightly somewhere around 6/10.
Now another movie ZYX, this time it gets 80 rewiews raing it 6/10 and 20 reviews with very low score, 3/10. Result will be 80% with avarge score also around 6/10.
So in theory we end up with two 6/10 movies but one of them is "rotten" at 20% andother one is certified "fresh" with 80%. That's why RT is absolute shit and shouldnt be taken seriously.
I can see why people might not like it though, its a really shortened remake of a long old German scifi film.
Oh wow lmao, I can't belive I used to check it before going to see a movie, no wonder I got fucked over more than once. Ty user
The site is populated by idiots. They have terrible taste in movies. They incapable of enjoying quality content. They enjoy trash. Its a great site for plebs and not a great site for patricians.
tldr: RT is a site for idiots. You aren't an idiot so you see its flawed perspective.