Yes yes i know you are all extremly busy with the current superhero movie

yes yes i know you are all extremly busy with the current superhero movie

but what did he mean by this?

Attached: 59285799_2263733057026242_8160880630578544640_o.jpg (1200x630, 100K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=2mhwQdV2iYQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Lynch's work rely heavily on simbolism and dreams. I think Goddard has a problem with this. I find Goddard wrong here, since all movies come from personal places in one way or the other but I disagree with the idea that Lynch's movies are all about him. Lynch taps into a creepy collective subconscious that most people have and explores it. I really dig his approach.

>simbolism

>Lynch taps into a creepy collective subconscious that most people have and explores it.
It sucks to noy be one of those people ;_;

You don't find a connection with Lynch's work? I do admit that some movies are a stretch (Inland Empire) but Mullholand Dr. for me is one of the greatest movies ever. Such an eerie atmosphere even in the first half where everything is "perfect". And the dinner scene with the shrink was my only true scare I have had while watching a movie.

>tfw you've outlived all those other bastards

Attached: 1535619926370.jpg (612x409, 55K)

What’s that got to do with a creepy collective subconscious though? And why is Lynch terrified of the Uruk Hai?

>And why is Lynch terrified of the Uruk Hai?
Why aren't you?

He is right in the sense that Lynch himself admited that all the symbolism in his movies is meaningless, and it's only there as part of an aesthetic sense that pleases him.

The only things I remember about Mulholland Drive are that Robert Forster seemed like he was going to be an important character, and then we never see him again, and that Naomi Watts seemed much more believable when she was acting (in her audition) than when she was being herself.