WHY do companies keep insisting on using CGI?

>after 5 years
I think the deterioration in 3D animation is slowing down. I still enjoy CGi from the early 2010s.

Oh it's even greater than you possibly imagine
youtube.com/watch?v=yTOj8-Aq-Nk

CGI was cutting-edge shit in the 90s. People didn't anticipate how dated it would look, they were mesmerized by how it currently was.

Attached: 3d.png (1333x1000, 1.69M)

You want some rough 90s CG
youtube.com/watch?v=wfuFEfxkY_I

How long can you last

I probably would've dig the crap out of that if I was a kid in the 90s. Remember that pic related blew people's minds.

Attached: DbD9OmFXUAAft6b.jpg (576x416, 32K)

>Toy Story
>dated
The only things that looks dated in Toy Story are Sid and his dog because they were intended to be as unlikable as possible within artistic integrity.
As a child your mind fills in a lot of details even though your eyes are (supposedly) fully developed while your brain is still developing. Its why children have a harder time distinguishing real from their own imagination.
Just as Toy Story gets older, so does the attention to detail. You can't watch Toy Story 1 as an adult if you watched it as a child. I guarantee you any adult that watched Toy Story 1 when it came out knew exactly which scenes wouldn't age well and which would.

Remember that that ain't working.

Yeah, but stuff like Toy Story and Reboot had decent stories. Plus while the rendering is dated, the camera work and scene direction aren't bad.

Meanwhile, some cheaper more slapped together shows like this age far far worse because they are crudely shot on top of badly aged CGI.

Attached: reboot enzo my mind is full of fuck.jpg (168x167, 6K)

Now I remember why I don't want to go back to watch the Iron Man and Hulk and FF toons like I want to rewatch the X-men ones. Even the bad CG swinging in Spider-man was better than those.

Then again, weren't X-men and Spider-man properly on Fox Kids while Iron Man, Hulk, and FF were syndicated? Even as a kid I noticed how those were cheaper productions.

>Why not a dummy in the white house?
Heh