>have an arch villain who is the counterpart to the hero, physical prowess enhanced through science and complented by custom equipment, as insane and cruel as the hero is thoughtful and selfless
>or you can have a fire breathing bruiser
I'll take glider goblin. The Green Goblin's tenacity, the threat he offers, should not be based on how well he takes a punch.
Jesus, user
>hides his denial by lashing out
Glider, but i really liked Ultimate Goblin, dude was a fucking beast
This fucker
I like that Norman just an asshole without split personality bullshit
Glider Goblin was fucking great.
Never understood why Elf Hulk was even a concept.
I fucking hated how they tried to make Norman into another standard world conquering evil business guy in the mid 00s. That was too damn far from his whole theme.
He was never supposed to be evil Stark
I'm going to have to go Glider for one reason. Well two reasons.
The reason they made Goblin they way they did was so that they did not have to do Venom. Once he came on the scene well now we have two guys who basically do the same thing not to mention the Hulk.
The other reason is the Lizard, like I get people want SPider-man villains to be more realistic or whatever but all it does is either make the, too similar to each other or just become more background fodder. Like I know some people like Hulk Goblin but think about it like this, does it make them stand out in Spider-man's rogues gallery or just make them more generic?
You're aware Norman was a scummy businessman for about two and a half entire decades before Luthor was, right?
Like for the entirety of Normans lifespan prior to his resurrection in the 90s, Lex Luthor was just a mad scientist in a green and purple costume who made robots.