The state of VAR in the EPLEL

era penal??

He was unsighted by the deflection, not by Sigurdsson

VAR said he's unsighted by siggurdsun, good night,

yeah, should have been a pen and second yellow for awb
var apparently not arsed about that though

>EVARton

>blocking someone's view is a foul in semen ball

Attached: 1457840881744.jpg (207x244, 9K)

I don't know why but IRL they're not given but in video games they are

You should stop embarrassing yourself and stick to handegg

Correct decision.

Goal shouldn't have gone up, IMO.

Yes, Wan-Bissaka gets there late and tackles Sigurdsson

>fake injury in offside
>get called for offside
I see nothing wrong with this

No one talks about Fred's "handball"?

based ref, obvious handball on the leg

Attached: hands.webm (1280x720, 1.3M)

should have gotten his ass up
lazy bastard

Maguire is so goofy

This was a correct decision though. The use of VAR in the PL has been disastrous, but this is a weak example.

It's the right call this time though

It's a technicality. Yes, he's in the "los" of the De Gay despite De Gay clearly being able to see the situation. De Gay goes for one side and the ball gets deflected which he wouldn't be able to save no matter what he does. The player on the ground has no bearing on anything. Sometimes refs need a little "Fingerspitzengefühl" as we say here.

.

twitter.com/skysports_bryan/status/1234178238945071106

He's clearly able to see the ball when it deflects off of Maguire. After which, De Gay has already shifted to his right and it will go in regardless. I thought the VAR was just to check if Sigurdsson touched it or not. Sigurdsson is not actively interfering with De Gay and is out of the play. I don't see why the goal was not given. Even if Sigurdsson is blocking De Gay's vision, I believe there should be some kind of deliberate intent. Sigurdsson's just lying there after getting clattered. What he's supposed to do, which is move if the ball comes to him, is exactly what he did.

Attached: everton manu.png (727x456, 558K)

He sees it the entire way. That's why he doesn't actually dive to his right. He sees the deflection and tried to redirect, but he's wrong-footed so he can't dive back the way he came.

Fuck United but he's in the way and that's offside.

de gae and manu got really fucking lucky on that decision, it's basically a shitty own goal they managed to get VAR'd and pass as "lol everton's player was blocking my view" when de gae went to his right for the initial trajectory but then found himself wrong footed by maguire's deflection.

lucky cunts and unlucky everton to be honest

incorrect. see Tammy Abraham against Bernd Leno

>de gea was unsighted
absolute bollocks

Shoving away a reciever isn´t an OPI in handegg.
Sean

After the dizzy heights of beating a 10 man side from Belgium, Man United come back down to earth, then reality sets in – MAN UNITED ARE GARBAGE.

kek, so not only does Sigurdsson miss a simple fucking tap-in, he's the one responsible for the goal getting disallowed because he's too lazy to get up after the miss.

JUST

My sides are gone.

Attached: Screenshot_2020-03-01 Get rid of VAR NOW We want our game back ( or not, some are happy)(1).png (1553x991, 102K)

the two sides of your brain maybe

Ah yes, the Danish city of Manchester.

>He's interfering with play because if he hadn't have moved out the way he'd have been interfering with play.

>How can it not be offside?
>He made a movement that directly interferes with the play
>If he stays still the ball hits him and doesn't go in and then he is offside

but he did influence play.

In what way would that have been any different if he wasn't there?

the sitting blue guy is not gaining any advantage whatsoever.

did they give the goal? it's clear offside

It shouldn't be possible to be offside once the ball is in the box. Absolutely semen slurping sport

Well I guess that settles it, if you can't trust a leaf to know about semen slurping then who can you trust?

he wouldn't have confused De Gea

How can you post this pic and argue it wasn't offside?
Look at the cunt haha.. Literally just chilling directly in front of De Gea like he's at the beach.

not actually affected anything with the goal though has it

He affected the entire situation by being a lazy cunt and sitting directly in front of the keeper

>it's a bunch of chimps don't understand the laws of the game episode
Whether he was physically impeding De Gea or blocking the sight of the ball isn't relevant. Merely providing a distraction by moving or making a gesture is enough to count as offside. He moved his legs at the last second to let the ball in. Correct decision. Eat shit.

Attached: Screenshot_2020-03-01 Microsoft PowerPoint - 11 Law 11 Offside ppt - law_11_offside_en_47383 pdf.png (1142x611, 262K)

>if he doesn't interfere with play, he's interfering with play
That's amazing.

>preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball. For example, by clearly obstructing the goalkeeper's line of vision or movement
He was on the ground. De Gea was stood up. He could very clearly see the ball. De Gea was not going to move up to save the ball. He was readying himself to move to his right.
>making a gesture or movement which, in the opinion of the referee, deceives or distracts an opponent
The only movement he made was to move his feet away from the ball. That was as the ball was rolling into the goal. Deception and distraction implies intent, which this rule is supposed to negate. Sigurdsson didn't make a movement to distract or deceive. De Gea was thrown off by the deflection, and had Sigurdsson not been there, the ball would have still rolled in.

>Whether he was physically impeding De Gea or blocking the sight of the ball isn't relevant. Merely providing a distraction by moving or making a gesture is enough to count as offside
Define "gesture". He moved his foot away. De Gea probably didn't even see that movement. No distraction was made. No attempt at distraction was made. Sigurdsson made the correct decision, the referee and the var room did not.

You're a retarded mongo. Kill yourself.

Your tears are precious. Just be happy you swindled a point at the fortress of Goodison.

he is essentially dummying the ball.
which is a trick play which involves him in the play.

the man in possession doesn't need to be touching the ball. only needs to be the one closest to it. watch any player while they dribble. their touches are minimal, the rest of the time they're just running alongside it.

the idiot should have stood the fuck up . what use is he lying flat in front of the goal line. fuck sake

Are you trying to say that Sigurdsson had possession of the ball as it rolled past him? Jesus you're desperate.

Obviously he just got clattered by two United players. Anywhere else it's a pen, but for some reason is never given for a shot on goal.

He's dummying the ball. that is possession anywhere else on the field. How can you deny that

Because it's not a dummy. It's not intended to deceive (the purpose of a dummy), it's intended to get out of the way. The only dummy here is you.

he was clearly channeling his chakra into Maguire to make him score an own goal.

That is a mistake of the keeper. Specially if he thinks that the ball is in direction of the goal (that he was badly positioned to react to because he moved to his right when the ball got deflected to the left). The ball either goes in without the player in front affecting it's path, so you have to try and block it, or the player interects with the ball in a way that would be an offside and freekick for your team.

Keeper ideally should've not moved to his right, and the reason he moved to that side was because of his own teammate not the enemy team. Even if he somehow would've tought that the player on the floor would have moved to the right in direction of the ball, it would have been the enemy team who were at fault so they would've got a free kick.

Enemy player didnt called for referee and you win nothing blocking the enemy goal when your own team can score. This scenario shouldnt count as offside.

>he's interfering with play even when he's not la!