Read this you fucking stupid twats

Its open to interpretation mate

The ball was played by a united player last you clinical retard. That should have been an own goal. There's no offside or interference because it wasn't played by an Everton player.

Attached: 1578715183137.jpg (540x798, 61K)

>doesn't interfere with play
>doesn't interefere with keepers view
>it's a deflection that was going in no matter what
>op is a tranny
LOL

>it's a deflection that was going in no matter what
this is the important part

Why bother?
ABU's can't be reasoned with
Anyone with common sense and knowledge of the game knows the correct decision was made

Attached: 1582366152180.jpg (1000x581, 115K)

De Gay is 1.92 m tall, if he didnt see that ball he's either stupid or doing it on purpose
Besides Maguire deflection, so automatically no offside

It was an own goal you fucking paki nigger

he does see it as he moves in response to it

he's certainly directly between the ball and keeper at one point.
not sure if it was the right call or not though.

Attached: player.webm (1120x630, 1004K)

Those are some good reflexes by the guy sitting on the ground.

He has to move his legs out of the way to let the ball go in. Literally dummies the ball from an offside position
How can you not tell if it's right or wrong?

Yes, it doesn't matter how tall you are you can't see through a human being without some high powered radiation.

i'm trying to watch the telly but my fucking gerbil keeps walking past and blocking my view

From this fucking view isn't it clear enough that De Gea is guessing the path of the ball because the fat cunt is blocking his view?

1. Ball comes off a United player invalidating any offside claim
2. The GK has clear sight of the ball the whole way
3. He's not interfered with the path of the ball

It should have been an own goal.

he's not offside at that point.the call is that de gea has his vision obstructed the moment the shot is taken (it isn't as he move right to intercept the shot) you can see him reacting to the deflection (which is a pass to my eyes). so the everton player on the ground was allowed to play the ball anyway

imo desu

>ball comes off a united player invalidating any offside claim
>He's in the path of the ball while being offside until the ball crosses the line

You fucking retards understand that if this is okay everyone can just crowd around the goalie while being offside then run away at the last moment and it's a good goal if it deflects off an opponent right?

It would have been an undeserved win for Everton.

>VAR is Based
What did he mean by this?

>and it's a good goal if it deflects off an opponent right?
Yes, that would be a goal you fucking retard. It doesn't matter if the opposition team players are on or offside if the final touch comes off your player and goes into the net with no other players from the opposition team touching it before that happens. Learn the rules moron.

>being this passionate about a club that cheats and trys to buy success more than any other despite living at the other end of the country.

Just switch to Liverpool mate, at least they're a decent team

>What the fuck bro, stop blocking my sight

Attached: why.jpg (680x511, 95K)

How often to deflected goals actually happen though? It's not something you can actually replicate in a real game

varchester united

It wouldn't because the player is interfering with play by blocking the goalie's vision.

He was offside before the ball left the opponents foot.

He continued to interfere with play while being offside because he sat that there and blocked the goalie's view.

If he wasn't fucking there it would have been an own goal.

BUT HE WAS THERE BLOCKING THE VIEW OF THE KEEPER AND BEING ON THE PATH OF THE BALL

WHY CAN'T MONGOLOIDS UNDERSTAND THIS?

The ball was travelling on the ground. You are looking at the view from the TV camera, his view of the ball was obstructed Interfering with play offside.

>It's not something you can actually replicate in a real game.

The thing is if he was anywhere near the ball they would have blown the whistle with the old offside rule. The new rule states that you can be offside if you're not interfering with play. He's blocking the view of the keeper so it's offside.

Why should I? The refs and the players and the coaches and the bribed officials and the pundits and the school kids and the women and the youtubers don't

>aussie banter
Bring back the fires

Sigurdsson is not affecting play and is therefore not offside

1. He didn't interfere because he didn't touch it
2. Based
3. Not offside at all

>bribed officials
>Fred legitimately won the ball with his thigh and was creating a dangerous counter attack
>End result
>Yellow card for handball and free kick for Everton which they nearly scored from

Please eat shit and die.

see

He can't interfere with play because MAGUIRE PLAYED THE BALL you dense cunt. Maguire was the one who routed the ball into the corner. That isn't Gylfis fault. If that ball had gone straight from DCL foot to the back of the net then THAT would be obstructing the keeper and offside however it was United's own player who played the ball last. It was a goal. Neck yourself.

That's debatable though. If the guy was standing then I would agree with you but he was just sitting on the ground twiddling his thumbs so the goalie should have been able to see above him. Granted he likely didn't think the ball was going to deflect off of his own teammate an go straight for the goal but you can't really blame a fluke deflection on the attacker. If anything that should be considered an own goal

If he blocked the keepers view then why did the keeper change direction after the deflection?

1. wasn't deliberate interference with De Gaya who already committed to the wrong way before Maggs touched it
2. He didn't block (did the opposite), deceive or distract anybody.
3. This is no different to running out of the way of the ball in a regular run or stopping just before crossing it's path.

Not offside. He didn't interefere with play at all, unless you want to claim that not interfering is actually interfering.

He is not obstructing his view you dense cunt

>He can't interfere with play

He interfered by being in the line of sight of the goalie and moving away his leg at the last moment to allow for the goal.

What kind of moron can't see how a player being sat on the ground in front of the goalie while the ball trickles by him into the goal isn't somehow blocking the keepers view of the ball.

Are you really this retarded?

AGAIN HE WAS OFFSIDE BEFORE THE FUCKING SHOT WAS FIRED. HE CONTINUES TO BE OFFSIDE AND CONTINUES TO INTERFERE WITH PLAY.
YOU DON'T MAGICALLY BECOME ONSIDE IF IT DEFLECTS OFF AN OPPONENT WHEN YOU ARE OFFSIDE IN THE FIRST FUCKING PHASE OF PLAY.

>It has to be deliberate
Reading comprehension.

De Gea was guessing where the ball was going based on what he can actually see because the fat cunt is blocking his view. He instantly points this out the moment the ball goes into the net. He doesn't think about it he just goes to point out that the cunt blocked his view immediately.

He is, VAR said so.

pretty fun as a neutral 2bh, manurists vs abus.

>gylfi wasn't obstructing DDG's view

Attached: Untitled-4.jpg (1094x703, 771K)

Yeah and it has to be deliberate obstruction, which it clearly wasn't. If he was so obstructed, why did De Gaya try to change as soon as the deflection hit? Again. He didn't interfere with the play at all. If you remove him from the situation De Gay still reacts too late after the deflection and it still goes in.

Are you legit this fucking dumb or pretending because I can't tell. Maguire touching the ball invalidated any claim of offside or obstruction. The man offside didn't play the ball. Maguire did. Cope retard.

so generally the way the law is interpreted is the defending player has to play the ball meaning some kind of level of control over it, just smashing it off a defender and it hits them doesnt consistute playing it. in this case i don't think the everton player is offside because maguire plays the ball and just fucks his touch up however, based on how i know fifa teaches referees to call that play based on the examples they give in their courses its offside.

fifa considers it offside even if youre ten yards fron the keeper and your teammate scores a blooter from 40 yards out if youre in an offside position so take that for what you will

>ball gets rifled into his legs from three yards away
>"he played the ball guys seriously!!!"
at least try to make bait that can trick somebody

Kek

You literally proved that it wasn't offside lol

>80m