Jose's first season was the best United post-SAF. Why didn't Woodwood help him improve on that?
Jose's first season was the best United post-SAF. Why didn't Woodwood help him improve on that?
If Mahomes is so good then how come he cant find me a gf
Yeah he only spent £200 million in his second season hurr durr why didn’t he get backing *farts*
I think he meant Jose's second season.
He came 5th...
What do you mean, he helped him steal the legendary alexis sanchez away from man city for only half a million quid per week, it was a real coup. It was solely Alexis' fault he turned out poorly, had nothing to do with everyone playing like dogshit for modern mourinho
He spent like 145m the second season
>take over a joke of a team
>win a treble including a european trophy
>finish 2nd
>have a down year but nowhere near as down as this season or the ones before him
>get fired
united got too big for their boots again and now they reap what they sowed
Why did Woodward buy Maguire for Ole but not for Jose?
jose wasnt a 'yes man' so woodward wanted him to fail so he could hound him out and bring in a drone who wont argue with him like ole
>Jose's second season was the best United post-SAF. Why didn't Woodwood help him improve on that?
Because he spent half a billion and didn't win and woodward is a retard and jose is a retard and the only manager who can save united is Pochettino so united will spend how much it is to buy him out of his contract so he can spend half a billion to need to spend another 300 million to finish 4th to get fired to be replaced by up and coming manager eddie howe who gets fired for being a nonce who is then replaced by woodward himself and he ends up winning the treble
kek
>Because he spent half a billion
What? No, he didn't. Yes, he spent a fair amount but so what? Man Utd had the earnings to spend more and they could have improved so the money should have been spent. I don't know what this judgmental/revenge bullshit is: Mourinho didn't win (although that 2nd was a huge season for the club) so we'll stop helping him out. Uh, what? If the squad can be improved, improve it. That's the way football is.
Based
United were dreadful when he was sacked so something needed to happen but United should have realised how cancerous the team was and gotten rid of them rather than the manager.
>b-but he spent gorillions
a) mourinho is not the one making the signings. b) he didn't get the players he asked for.
How can a club spend so much money yet still have ashley young as a starting fullback lmao
>tfw Luke Shaw has been playing for Utd for almost 6 years now
Is he the next JayLingz?
this, they backed the players instead of the manager and paid the price
>Pogba
good but cancerous
>Lukaku
good but could've done better
>BOSSman and Mkhi
flop
>Bailly
Has potential but not dependable to play a full season
>Lindelof
Slightly below PL-tier
>Matic
Passed his peak
>Fred
not sure
>Dalot
Inexperienced
The only successful signing Jose made for United was Zlatan. And tbf to Jose, most of those players he bought were replacement type, not improvement.
remember when they signed pogba lukaku and zlatan in 2016 and they thought they were gonna win the league. LMAO
but then buy the players jose would have wanted anyway?
woodward can't be that stupid.
Cringe
The only good signing was martial but he was mega expensive ~75m
360m was spent during his tenure you kiwi retard. 360m on a squad with no midfield, no strike force, no right wing, shit tier defenders is nothing. It's trash.
The manager doesn't negotiate transfers, Woodward is a fucking retard and there's the 30-40% united tax on transfers anyway. Jose was the best chance for united to go back to the top. They blew it by being cheap fucks. Poch has no balls for the united job, no top manager will want it at this point. United is a finished club unless they get sold to better owners.
The manager doesn't negotiate transfer fees or wages you retarded monkey.
He didn't want to buy Maguire because the glazers are cheap fucks. They had to buy him because they eventually realized that Jose was right that the defense was weak. Basically they're penny pinching retards who only bought out of desperation. That's why Leicester could such a high fee, they knew they had very few options. It's also the reason why they're overpaying all their players because 1) No top player wants to come to united anymore so 2) they have to overpay the players they already have just to retain them
A complete failure of a club.
Van Gaal was the only post-Fergie manager that actually had a plan. Had he been given 3 seasons, the team would have come good under him.
...
Woodward doesnt care anout sporting results, his obsession is with club revenue and securing noodle sponsorships.
>all this cope for that bum who ended up sacked AGAIN
>he-he-he didn't make those signings!
lmao kys
DDG
AWB Tuanzebe Maguire Shaw
Matic
Perisic Herrera Pogba Rashford
Lukaku
>implying Mourinho couldn't have set this team up to defend the fuck out of the game and destroy teams on the counter in the pleb Man Utd fans could get over their plebbish 'United Way' attacking philosophy
I agree. United under LvG played a really good, controlled football. They nullified some good sides esp Liverpool and City.
People said the style was boring but like LvG said, they didn't park the bus, they played possession football up high on the pitch, it's just the players were too shit to move the ball quicker.
Now they have more 'freedom' but most of them don't have any idea what to do when in possession and keep losing the ball casually in midfield.
shut up u nonce
I’d agree with all of that.
A great manager (which Jose is btw) makes average players better though, he didn’t do that at Man Utd.
/trb/ lied to me?
fucking kek
Mourinho is always good for the 1st season by the end or the second hos players hate him by his third they are almost fighting .
You don't keep him around .
>Make average players better
I always feel like ppl dont see the bigger picture when saying this. Great managers can only make average players better IF they already had a team with solid foundation. Fergie was able to win with some mediocre players because he had the know-how, old guards in the team and constantly adding high level players to that pool. He created a safety net. The 4 managers after him have been buying replacement players again and again that the team became full with strangers trying to guess each others moves. No manager can make average players better in this team. Klopp and Pep were given time and money to build their vision, United spent bazillions but it's not enough if they wanted fast result. I dont know what are their planning right now. They need experienced players who are still in their prime to guide this team.
That’s a fair point.
Remember though, Fergie had 6 years with just a FA Cup to show for it. Different times.
best season since fergie you say? well...
>3 of the 5 highest paid players
>world's most expensive player
>150m spent
pretty impressive, now let's look at the table...
>6th
>7 points behind 4th
>less wins than when Van Gaal got sacked (and finished 5th, only missed out on CL on GD)
Ah yes Jose VERY IMPRESSIVE
Only difference between Jose and Van Gaal is that Jose had the easiest Europa League run ever, whereas Van Gaal got Liverpool (and would thereafter have had Dortmund, Villarreal, Sevilla. tough.) while Jose had...
>st etienne
>rostov
>anderlecht
>celta vigo
>ajax
wow...
Mourinho is a brilliant manager, possibly the greatest mind in football, but he's also a complete cunt who will make enemies out of everyone given enough time.
Making matters worse, United is currently suffering from full-blown cancer. The rot goes from the top(owners, board, Woodward) to the players, to the fanbase. No manager can sort that out alone. I feel bad for Ole, and whoever steps into that shit club next.
Anyone have the complete list of players signed since Fergie left.
It's hilariously depressing.
Lindelof is actually good desu
Remember when they sacked him just after he won the fa cup. Woodward deserves everything he gets
Or the last 20 or so players Fergie signed before he left. That's probably equally depressing.
Jose basically abandoned the league halfway through that season. Winning trophies were priority to create momentum. And they finished 2nd the season after.
>but muh points gap
Lets be honest. Utd were too far away from City quality regardless of how much they spent. And they are even worse now.
>easier run
Yeah teams should be allowed to pick their opponents to prove that they are worthy. Yep. Why do those shit teams even exist amirite?
>Jose basically abandoned the league halfway through that season
sarri finished third while winning the europa league and making it to the league cup final. more points with a worse squad
>Utd were too far away from City quality regardless of how much they spent
I said behind 4th not behind City, idiot. they still finished behind liverpool, spurs, chelsea, arsenal all of whom they outspent
>easier run
Pointing out that you can have an easy run to a final is a very valid point.
fuck off shitskin customer, go support your local team
>United could have had Koudibailly for €8m more
>Van Gaal got Liverpool (and would thereafter have had Dortmund, Villarreal, Sevilla.
>Jose had...
>st etienne
>rostov
>anderlecht
>celta vigo
>ajax
It's crazy how much easier of a run United had than the preceding three Europa league seasons. Even Sevilla were in the UCL and didn't defend it.
Jose wanted to get the fuck out of there when he saw how shit Sanchez was