Gary Lineker has had his salary cut.
Gary Lineker has had his salary cut
Hero
Inspiration
Legend
Lineker.
Shat himself once
Brave
Ready for action
Orgasmic
Unexposable
Great
Holy Lineker
He should have taken the money and done something positive with it the retard. Now some rich executive in the BBC is going to get a pay rise and buy a new car.
>only getting 1.75 BBCs per month
Poor guy
How will he feed his wife's son without pay?
why
To what
>Ok I will take a cut
>I will accept £1.5mil plus tip
What does he even do? Every time I see him he's slouching in his chair and mumbling to the pundits. He doesn't offer any kind of in-depth analysis.
Oh no, now he'll have to rely on his crisps and BT money. The poor bloke will be on the game before long.
>What does he even do?
leeches off tv loicence taxpayers money
I don't like Lineker but that's kind of unfair since that isn't his job, he's the presenter/moderator and I have to admit that he does it rather well despite his politics and stuff like that.
so he got his salary cut but found a way to make it look like he did it himself? this is retarded
He could at least sit up straight.
he reads a fucking autocue. no one watches motd to see this smug fuck
>1.75m for doing what we do here every day for free
Why do people here hate him? You might disagree with his politics but he seems like a positive person. He was also a top player (according to my dad).
He was a very good player who literally shat on the pitch.
He did it for England. What did you do for England?
>tfw someone is confident enough to shit in front of 60 k people but I’m afraid that someone would hear me shitting in a stall
>moderator
Exactly
Will our license fee's be reduced to reflect this?
if shitposting was an olympic event i'd win the gold every year
what a nice guy
maybe now the BBC can let the over 75s keep their free TV licences
wasnt meant to be an acrostic, the fact my words spelled hill was pure coincidence
Or better yet. Sack Linecuck and replace him with an over-75.
Like Des Lynam,
I now remember Des Lynam.
holy shit
He should have invested it all in LINK.
what's the point of getting a pay cut? there is no such thing as being overpaid, because the system will always underpay you compared to the money you make the system earn
Because he's been paid from what is essentially a tax and has received plenty of criticism over the years for it.
>eternally employed by the state with huge salary for minimal effort
>demands that state take in endless third worlders that will leech off the state for generations
>cheats on his taxes
The perfect representation of today's sjw leftist.
>Why do people here hate him?
Right wing hivemind since he dared voice his political opinions, i'm sure people will try to pretend this isn't the case, but he never got 1% of the abuse he now gets before he said that stuff.
Fair play to him, takes balls in his position to do it, knowing the media will come after you hard
>TV licence is good because the BBC makes good work
Imagine the government paying a presenter 1.75 million but refusing to give junior doctors a raise (make less than teachers and nurses).
idiot.
GIVE
SOLDIERS
FOOTBALLERS'
WAGES
Lefties i know hate him too, its just the lib crowd that likes him
That's not the point. Football is private sector. The BBC is not. It should not be proportional to viewership. Otherwise every other public sector worker should be paid for how much they work/volume. A doctor performs a surgery that would cost £500,000? Then he should be given that by your logic.
The government isn't paying Lineker.
Hopefully it's a 90% paycut
Let BT Sport pay him his wedge
BBC workers are NOT part of the public sector
>Fair play to him, takes balls in his position to do it, knowing the media will come after you hard
they prop you up on a pedestal and call you brave and inspiring, what are you on about?
The most read newspapers in the UK are The Sun, The Daily Mail, The Daily Express and The Telegraph. If you think these newspapers put lineker up on a pedestal and call him inspiring you're fucking retarded.
I swear some brainlets on here just read Americans posting on /pol/ about their media and assume it's the same over here.
>Like Des Lynam
Yes
yes
YES
Or somebody who is a much better presenter than Lineker and would still trigger the tabloids just as much
Or the Irish fella that does Football League highlights, he's far more insightful.
>media is just print press
Ironic you're calling people brainlets with views like this.
>Why do people here hate him?
He basically personifies that smug passive aggressive twattery that is rampant among Twitter where he's constantly provoking people and antagonising them then plays the victim when he's called out or abused.
Of course, Lineker and his acolytes claim he never does anything wrong and that he's completely innocent, even when calling people 'dickheads' or 'racist idiots', or shitting his pants when someone with an actual argument challenges him to support the shit he says.
There's also the fact he's absolutely desperate to try and impress his liberal media elite "mates", even though they all think he's just a dumb ex-footballer.
So please tell me all these media sources in the UK that are more influential than The Sun and Daily Mail. I'm getting ready to laugh when you claim Buzzfeed
BBC FFS.
So you've managed to list 1 source that will "put him up on a pedestal"
I wasn't even the person you were arguing with. I'm just pointing out your fucking stupidity in thinking "the media" is simply the print press. It's like you've been in a cave for the past 25 years.
fool. your salary is all about "how many people can do this guy's job?" being a football "legend", having charisma, being competent to run a football show is harder for most people than learning medecine
Mirror, Times, Metro and Standard are more read then the Torygraph and Express.
Clue yourself up, homo.
Holy cringe that tweet
Buzzfeed articles show up in textbooks in British colleges, I know because I've been there
it's not hard at all, which is why gabby logan, dan walker, mark "chappers chappy happy" chapman do it, do it well and do it for much less.
loads of people can do lineker's job. there is no logical reason for the bbc to be paying him what they do.
in fact they should fuck off motd altogether. paying £83m a year for rights and then the salaries of the mongs they have on the program isn't value for money or justifiable.
>Only Gary Lineker can read from the MOTD autocue
He's quite good at it but I imagine there are dozens of people that could do it as well and for less.
In the US doctors make a ton more than nurses and teachers. Even as residents.
Remember when Lineker avoided paying tax when he sold his house in Barbados and then tried to play innocent.