Inb4 he tracks down the S*n journo and beats him to death. He is seething

inb4 he tracks down the S*n journo and beats him to death. He is seething.

Attached: _108833711_sun-front.jpg (660x840, 123K)

Attached: EEqCN52W4AA-4_Y.jpg (1122x905, 202K)

i wish i could kill journalists with my mind

Imagine if Stokes decides to play for New Zealand after this

>tries to write formal quasi-legal statement
>vaguely succeeds in a kind of bad way
>can't help putting in 'it is totally out of order' anyway
kek

Is the Sun still /ourpaper/?

Why do they even do it? They're literally giving it away these days.

Attached: 89d chess.png (339x540, 17K)

Enemies of The People desu

Attached: trump_statesman.jpg (4272x3204, 450K)

I wonder why people still read the Sun

if you think about it, if they just didn't get shot they probably would have lived

Builders who just want sport news and tits in their lunch break

lel

Really makes you contemplate.

superior gammons who don't want the more obvious wank rags.

Attached: _107495608_sun-front-page-22.06.jpg (660x851, 149K)

>Bust is Back in Britain

Good to hear I guess.

i wonder why people still browse /pol/

It used to be for the tits on Page 3.

No 1st amendment in bingbongistan, so can't he just sue the shit out of them?

Face it Yea Forums, The Sun is our guy

Attached: PraisetheSun.jpg (620x417, 55K)

Attached: sun-pls understand.jpg (817x529, 180K)

*calls a prominent public figure a necrophile who digs up kids graves to have sex with them, with no evidence, in the newspaper*
freedom of speech brah you can't touch me

Free holidays.

All he can do is complain to the regulator over any factual errors and for 'intruding on private grief'. They will tell them not to do it again, repeat.

The sun is generally read by poor people with very low intelligence because they like the 9:50 holidays. The sun doesn't publish page 3 girls anymore, only the star and sport. Infact I'd go as far as saying the daily sport is the only tabloid worth buying these days.

I thought they got rid of tits in papers because respect wammens.

Karma

based. he deserves this for being born a kiwi

Well they still have scantily dressed girls, in a way it’s more erotic to leave a little to the imagination

If they'd have published lies and he could prove it, then yes he could take them to court for libel, newscorp have become excellent at making speculation look like facts so they pretty much print what they know will sell knowing they can't be touched. It's actually top banter.

At least the Sport knows it's a joke and presents itself as one

It's bought in the hope that one day the tits will return, no one with an IQ over 70 actually trusts it as a news source.

They removed the page 3 girls but replaced it with whatever excuse of an excuse of a 'story' they can find to post a big titted celeb in a bikini.

>english people hating the sun
surprising

We are talking about the sun newspaper, not the actual sun. Hope this clears things up for you

Is this a stereotype in France? What happened to the expression 'Only mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun'?

Rachel a cute

Your ironic comment is harming her unborn baby

t. web troll

get some sleep gramps

>no one with an IQ over 70 actually trusts it as a news source
Christ, they made up the Stokes story? That really is scummy as fuck.

Didn't realise Michael Owen browsed Yea Forums

There's no law against being insensitive, even with the minor inaccuracies there's no case

>twisting words
t. Sun journalist

for what? it's not like it's a lie so it's not libelous or anything.
our tabloid press can pretty much print whatever they want, it's tv news that gets censored and neutered.

>be English
>get shot

Like father
Like son

I like the fact that every other news outlet is now also reporting on it under the guise of promoting 'responsible journalism' yet still getting clicks off the same tragedy
>The Sun branded 'disgraceful' for story about BEN STOKES' MURDERED SIBLINGS
>'It's the lowest form of journalism' says Ben Stokes about story concerning HIS MURDERED SIBLINGS
All journos are utter scum.

Not a single one of God's own Englishmen were killed though? They were all Kiwis

fuck this gay earth

Probably organised it between themselves.

>"Our newspaper is held to a higher standard to yours so we can't print sensationalist trash, print it in your lowbrow rag so we can 'give commentary'".
>"Yeah no problem, that'll be £20k."

Yeah wouldn't surprise me if the Beeb or the Guardian slipped a cheeky few grand their way so they can moralise while still exploiting it.

The Guardian published that pretty scummy editorial the other day about how Cameron was posh so he wouldn't have been as sad as most people would be when his son died. All the other outlets pulled them up on that as well.

In fairness, the BBC just mentioned Stokes' seethe and didn't say anything about the Sun's story or what it was about. The Guardian also didn't say anything other than it related to a family tradegy. I get the point though and most do exploit situations like this.

1. Eton toffs are not human so only have lowered empathy levels.
2. Kid was retarded so DC was secretly relieved.

ah, thank you.
no it isn't

Fair enough, credit where it's due I guess, although the Guardian's probably still on thin ice after so I doubt they'd rock the boat at this point even if they wanted to.

It's the usual
>What Love Island means for feminism
So they can write about tabloid nonsense while maintaining their self image

>not sunday sport

Attached: b0hbtf66jb221.png (368x295, 75K)

As an American who reads a bit of British news, it's always struck me how several websites, including The Guardian's, seemingly have no sense of "above the fold".
If I look at an American daily, the top stories are politics and major events, with maybe a sports recap or story of local needy people. One has to scroll down a ways to get to the opinions and celebrity gossip.
If I look at The Guardian's home page, the headlines are crap like "Downton Abbey listed on Airbnb" and "Facebook moderators frightened by what they see". They also do a lot of "Important person criticizes PM".
The geopolitics journalism is then confined to a red box with smaller text.

because no one cares about that gay shit

>Important person criticizes PM
has always been a big part of GB news. The BBC have to cover that as well.
And x says y about tedious managerial bullshit.

The Guardian now have their outright opinion columns in pink and got rid of some of the b8. They took shit for it even from their own side.

Attached: _108833416_guardian-front.jpg (660x797, 160K)

When I was a kid I used to think the daily mail was really high brow journalism because the header was formal looking then as I got into my twenties I realised that all it """reports""" about is how much immigrants have ruined our country (kind of true) and pictures of famous women who've put on weight. Literally nothing informative in any UK newspaper.

you forgot health scares, like killer virus on its way to britain etc

based

I had to talk to a Daily Mail rat once, ordered to do so to sell something. They don't call them reptiles for nothing. Uncanny sense you're not talking to a human and they are trying to work you and trip you up 100% of the time. If you ever have to do this, watch out for the first question, which will establish how much you'll allow them to take the piss, and then a surprise last question which is info they have and have held back. If the first question takes the piss too far tell them to turn the tape off.
Daily Mail = filth. Worse than the Sun.

reckon they shouldn't have printed that

bbc.com:
>Parliament suspended 'to stop MPs frustrating PM'
>Brexit: What does 'podiumgate' say about chances of a deal?
bbc.com/news:
>Top UK court scrutinises parliament suspension

I see your point.

There are 100's of thousands of people watching that supreme court case which will go on for three days kek.

fucking idiot

Wayne are u back in US already m8

Why is everyone's reaction to shit like this is to take rights away? Society is so backwards it is incredible.

Everything causes cancer according to the Daily Mail.

The people at the Sun are not journalists.

The Express is king of the front page doom health scare. Readership is all on the exit ramp.

oh no no, what's up with Rachel's baby? what trolls? why?

Because we're fucking infantile

Look at her twitter, shes' become a grade A fruit loop and spends all day raging about antisemitism specifically on the left

web trolls

>Look at her twitter

Would prefer to look at her bum tbqh.

Attached: rachely riley countdown-3.webm (1050x800, 1.08M)

I used to follow her on twitter but unfollowed for reasons stated by this dude
She's fit as fuck and sick at maths but she talks about discrimination when she went to Oxford and all she knows is white privilege and affluence.
Moral of the story is; if you get famous and are a bit of a faggot, don't express polarising opinions publicly. Or do it anyway then have a cry about people being meanies on twitter instead of just logging out or letting your p.a. run it.

Attached: 1568451542709.png (192x262, 103K)

>sick at maths
example?
i actually think that STEM wife is the only solution. i mean, most of modern girls SOUND(speech, vocabulaty, thoughts, voices, intonations) so dumb that i can not imagine them raising a good kid

>RILEY'S PAIN Rachel Riley reveals anti-Semitic Twitter trolls upset her so much that her unborn baby stopped wriggling in the womb for days
imagine being so much of a sensitive twitter warrior that it affects your health and the health of an embrion

so, is it true women are that much sensitive/emotional?

working class people

Attached: rachel riley-countdown.webm (1920x1080, 1.99M)

she has a degree in maths from one of the best universities in the world.

I don't agree with scousers often but boycotting that rag is for the best

did she use higher math outside uni?

60m?

She joined countdown at 22 so I doubt she did much outside of uni.

Habit. Also a lot of thick people will try and ridicule anyone think is smart or smarter than them.

its daily circulation is 'only' around 1 million.

why that front page is a bad thing? i don't know who ben is

it's nobody else business. why does the public have the right to know? besides its barely even news.

Is are Kelly fat now?

because MUH FREE SPEECH protects you from any consequences of your words, apparently. Meanwhile most people are denied the right not to spend most of their free time partaking in drudgery to make money for someone they'll never meet, but who cares, because rights don't apply to normal people

Apparently, it was one of the best selling Sun's print in the last 7 years, so yes, there's a public interest in that news.

I just flat out wish I could kill with my mind.

Mad bad and dangerously sad

At least people are taking an interest in cricket

ah, so no one knew that his siblings were killed? like i said, i don't know who the guy is

yeah, its a shame. best seeling print is just a story from someones private life that has no impact or relevance in the general publics life. no wonder everyone loves social media.

>because MUH FREE SPEECH protects you from any consequences of your words, apparently
as it should you fucking bootlicker.

Attached: c82710.png (200x200, 38K)

Reported to the Met for hate speech

We warned you niggas

Attached: 1561200000116.jpg (750x1334, 137K)

They were right about you lot though.

Even they admitted they were wrong kek, and now Liverpool is a city with a lower crime rate than every other major UK city.

This also coincides with the right wing having zero presence in the city, really makes you think huh :^)

>lower crime rate than every other major UK city.

Irrelevant when you compare the ethnicity of
major UK cities.

They were right. We all know it.

I would still nuke it into oblivion if I had the choice

>Although much lower than in other northern cities such as Manchester, Newcastle and Burnley, the crime rate in Liverpool is still high, with 266 crimes per 1,000 people. This is 78% higher than the national average of 149. Antisocial behaviour is a significant problem in Liverpool.
Why do these nignogs lie so much?

>muh immigrants

Every time kek, you know maybe right wing politics that preach division and removal of communities lead to an increase in crime. Just a thought

Luckily, the only choice you're ever likely to have in your place of work is whether to flip the burger another time before serving it up.

>Much lower than other northern cities

Point proven, thanks :)

Attached: 1568320276092.jpg (4096x2831, 1.08M)

The low crime rate is probably down to the femininity of the average Scouse male with his voice five octaves higher that any normal man and spending their jobless days still crying about the sun.

>right wing politics that preach division

Who is it that claims there are more than two genders and are fond of LGTBRAAP+ initialisms

This. Fuck me. Only Brummies are more annoying than Scousers

>Liverpool is a city with a lower crime rate than every other major UK city
>much lower than in other northern cities such as Manchester, Newcastle and Burnley
Why do these nignogs lie so much?

>you know maybe right wing politics that preach division and removal of communities lead to an increase in crime.
So how do you explain the other northern towns and cities that are Labour through and through that have a higher crime rate than Liverpool?

You realise that it's possible for crime rates to be lower than both northern and southern cities at the same time right?

Or do you unironically think London has a lower crime rate than places like Burnley?

Christ, the undeserved smugness coming off your post is almost overpowering.

Would you like to know why Liverpool has such a low crime rate? I'll tell you, you smug bellend. It's because all the scousers go into Lancashire, Warrington and Greater Manchester to rob. It's what they do. It's in their blood. Nothing can change that. Scousers are thieves, not clever enough to stay out of trouble, but just about smart enough to do it out of their own area.

The english stereotype in france is that you only eat roast beef.

>Liverpool is a city with a lower crime rate than every other major UK city
>a lower crime rate
>than every other major UK city
Why is the nignog backtracking on his claim now?

All the drug dealers from Liverpool seem to end up in places like Middlesbrough, Sunderland and Newcastle too.

Thread is riddled with L-b D-ms

Holy fucking based!

Yea Forums in RUINS!

>Yea Forumsol has entered the thread

>entered
it was there from the start lad

enter this
*unzips anus*

he calls for a boycott becus they upset a few millionaire celebrities
onions

>that sudden stop when she realises her arse is wobbling all over the telly

>telleh

Attached: peter-kay-300-124586535.jpg (1704x2044, 294K)

>Removal of communities
>Supports the policy of ethnically cleansing historically English communities

To annoy Scousers.

kek sperg

fuck this gay earth

Based insecure retard coming back to a thread he abandoned 2 hours ago

So why don't make a legal accusation? SUN is untouchable?

they didn't do anything illegal though?

not him nerd

nothing worse than /pol/ children

>i-i-i-i-it's not m-me even though I write in the exact same way
Rent free

The faggot said "inaccuracies" shit in the text , so you can make a case about fake news and moral damages.

yes, those criminal right wingers

Attached: 1.png (308x499, 13K)

what the fuck are you even talking about

>Scouse education

I'm not from Liverpool you spergy cunt, you're lost in space.

When did I say you were from Liverpool?

based scouser

You're talking fucking gibberish about the wrong poster and now in cope.

>filmed smashing up a bus
>Mersey police “didn’t see nuttin la”

You wonder why the crime rate is so low in Liverpool

Deflecting away from the question you can't answer

>rubbing his spergy hands together at impending semantics
lelno

Thanks for the free (you)
You can continue deflecting

2 anti-Sun hashtags have trended all day due to this (despite a /really/ low number of tweets using them)

Attached: ukt.png (274x466, 12K)