Did England win the 1966 World Cup fairly or was it bullshit?
Did England win the 1966 World Cup fairly or was it bullshit?
Other urls found in this thread:
It's still technically 3-2 if you subtract the ghost goal.
I prefer not to speak. If I speak, I am in big trouble.
Could you imagine sp in 1966?
Yea but fans were spilling onto the field the play should have been stopped
And the momentum of the game completely changed with the questionable goal.
The Germany equaliser in normal time was from a free kick they shouldn't have got, so in the end it's fair
Unfairly. They conspired with Germany to reach the final. They arranged specific refs for specific matches.
fairly, teams played with the same ball
Unironically fairer than most World Cups of the 20th century
I don't know, I wasn't there.
> implying that the big rig didn't come in the quarterfinals
England were assigned a West German ref, and West Germany were assigned an English ref. Both games were scandals. The ghost goal in the final was a footnote compared to the qf.
My dad says it wasn't quite fair, got away dirty, had a bit of scripting. Idk, I think they should have at least one wc. But whatever, they are not winning it again.
To be fair, they thought it was all over.
The vast majority of world cups were not won fairly
Though I like the fact England won in 66, they robbed Argentina
Fuck Argentina
Based
maradroga made sure they got their vengeance
I haven't watched it, but it was bullshit.
I just found this and fuck me I'd love us to host another one soon
twitter.com