Rate from best to worst.
Rate from best to worst
Other urls found in this thread:
premierleague.com
youtube.com
sportbible.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Yes
lampard >>>>>>>> scholes > gerrard
gerrard > gerrard > gerrard
Scholes>Lampard>>>>Gerrard
beckham >
Scholes > Lampard > Gerrard
Keane > Scholes >Vieira > Lampard > Gerrard
Gerrard > Lampard > Scholes
Scholes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lampard >/= Gerrard
second famine when
Lampard > Scholes >>>>> Gerrard
Gerrard: 88.5
Scholes: 88.4
Lampard: 88.3
They were all very different types of players though with very different strong points.
Its:
Gerrard > Scholes > Lampard
Its very close though.
t.neutral fan
Lampard>Gerrard>Scholes
Surprised by people putting Lampard on top. Scholes was way more technically gifted while Gerrard was way more physically gifted.
This
I will never not be baffled by people overrating scholes. Lampard>scholes=gerrard and it's only like that because stevieg changed positions, thus getting bonus rate for versatility.
lampard > scholes > gerrard
also Premier League >>>> '''''''''champions''''''''' league
Lampard > Gerrard >>>>> Scoles
For someone played years in the top club Scholes record was really average. Especially the total assist, only 43, one point below Crouch.
>deflectpard better than either of the other two
embarrassing
Speaking as someone who doesn't give a shit about Man Utd, Liverpool or Chelsea: Scholes > Lampard > Gerrard.
Scholes was central to the way Man Utd played attacking, free flowing football during their dominant periods in the late 90s and 2008. He'd start every move, find space for himself, always find the right pass, and chip in with some goals too. Lampard wasn't as important to Chelsea but he was unselfish, underrated technically and scored about twenty goals a season six times from central midfield. Gerrard was the man for the big game, but apart from that, he didn't score as many as Lampard and was driven by selfishness and ego at the expense of his team, spraying passes and shots around non-stop so he'd be the one to take the glory and point to his captain's armband at the end.
The biggest example of Gerrard's ego and hold over Liverpool fans was his final season when they almost (and should have) won the league. They played him as defensive midfielder just to feed his ego and let him play a part, and although he did have good games, there were many more where having an old player trying to dash around to shield the defence was a detriment, and that was even before the slip against Chelsea.
Lampard was a penalty baby tho, unlike scoles. Scoles also played a little deeper so not as many goals and assists.
Scholes was the better short and long range passer and also dribbler, and you can't measure this with goals and assists.
As an overall player gerrard was superior to them both.
For Athleticism I give Gerrard an 8, Lampard a 7, Schols a 6.
For technical quality I give Gerrard an 8, Lampard 7, and schols 9.
Therefore:
-Gerrard = 8+8=16
-Lampard = 7+7 = 14
-Schols = 6+9 =15
So it goes:
1) Gerrard
2) Schools
3) Lampard
Thread/
Gerrard=Lampard>>>Scholes
What Lampard has going for him is that he sustained a very good level for longer than Gerrard, until Stevie G had that one swan song of a season in 2014, which ended tragically.
Gerrard had a better and more pronounced prime — he was arguably the best midfielder in the world from 2005 to 2009 and simply made Liverpool better, whereas Lampard's Chelsea was insanely stacked everywhere on the pitch.
As for Scholes, of course he was good, but nowhere near the peaks in individual performance as those two. Ferguson and the team around him elevated his game, and I don't think that if you put either Lamps or Gerrard in that Utd that they would have done a better job than Scholes did, but Scholes wouldn't have had the same impact they had if you put him in their teams.
Assists were only recorded starting in like... 2006. They went back and covered a few seasons prior, but anything from the 90s is pretty unreliable. I just looked up another source stating Scholes had 55 assists.
laughing at the autistic aussie retard
For me, it's Lampard.
lampard not even close
Based. Not only did he /thread himself, he did it wrong.
Based
Lampard > Gerrard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scholes
Kill, kill, kill
reminder that Scholes has fewer Premier league assists than Peter Crouch, Danny Murphy, James Milner, Darren Anderton, Steed Malbranque, Kevin Davies, Jimmy Floyf Hasselbaink, Steve McManaman, Damien Duff, Stewart Downing, Nobby Solano, Andy Cole, Ashley Young and both of the far superior players you are comparing him to.
premierleague.com
Fucking overrated ginger fraud. Zoomers need to take there Scholes meme and fuck off
Look at Also just looking at stats alone is retarded if you watched all 3 of them play throughout their whole careers you'll know this ranking is correct
>Ability
Scholes
Lamard
Gerrard
>Trophies
Scholes
Lampard
Gerrard
>Attitude
Lampard
Gerrard
Scholes
Gerrard was obviously a good player but I don't see how anyone who isn't a Liverpool fan can put him up there with Lampard and scholes. He was also arguably the most overrated captains of all time
you cant really say lampard was better ability wise than gerrard, his higher stats can easily be because of the better team lampard had, they were really similar but gerrard was even better defensively
True I will admit Gerrard was the best defensively out of the 3
Imagine actually thinking Lampard and Gerrard were better than Scholes... I mean just imagine the level of sub human iq needed to produce that opinion.
youtube.com
forlan talking about how underrated and good scholes was
>Assists were only recorded starting in like... 2006.
thats a complete lie. there's players on the list who stopped playing before that year
Gerrard > Lampard > Scholes
1. Lampard
2. Gerrard
3. literally who?
Gerrard
Lampard
Scholes
The other way around in terms of success
Lampard = Gerrard > le get redcarded every other match red head
overall lampard>overally gerrard>>>>>>>>>overall scholes
peak gerrard>>>>peak lampard>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>peak scholes
gerrard fell off at the end of his career due to injuries and was nowhere near the player he was. lampard declined pretty slowly, contributed lots even at city when he was basically retired at chelsea. scholes is massively overrated now he retired, no work rate, poor defensively, couldn't play further forward like gerrard and lampard both did. gerrard was as good at the meme holywood passes as him
Lampard > Gerrard
> power gap
> scholes
Scholes is a literal who
Lampard > Slip = Scholes
Name of that kid? Albert Einstein
>couldn't play further forward
Are you taking the piss? Scholes spent the bulk of his first decade in football playing further forward.
Literally scored 20 goals in the early 2000's playing off RVN.
This is the post.
Scholes > Lampard > Gerard
Gerard was overrated and a mental midget
Scholes doesn't deserve to be rated next to them
clutch man>le occassional blooter man>le pass sideways man
Lampard=Gerrard>>>>>>>>>>>>>Scholes
A fucking leaf commenting on football
>drags shit tier team to CL final win, MOTM
>scores 30 yard blooter in FA cup final added time to force a draw in regulation time, and win on penalties
'mental midget'
Lampard was goals gifted
>’Would you say he is better than us Frankie?’ asked an emotional Steven Gerard when asked about Paul Scholes
>’Yes’. Said Lampard at once with a tear on his eye
stevie >> frank >> anybody else >> ginger fraud
I equally despise Manure, Lavorplel and that Russian Aluminum club
Lampard > Gerard >>> Scholes
Milan choked
Gerrard hit a lucky shot
>People unironically saying anyone other than Scholes
Dont make me pull out the quotes.
Scholes>Lampard>Gerrard
Not hating on Stevie, they all were great
Zoom zoom back to 9fag or r*ddit.
Scholes is lightyears above them. The only people who even doubt that are scousers or a zoomers like this retard:
all 3 are overrated english players that could only shine with foreign players alongside them. what did they accomplish for their country? fuck all is what
You're just jelly because France hasn't produced a native world class talent in decades
I would sat scholes is the best, tecnically was the best of the three by far.
You can't really compare scholes to lampard and gerrard, they where different types of mid fielders.
Scholes is much more of a xavi and ineasta type of player, a technical player you can distribute the ball to his forwards and beat their marker of the dribble.
Gerrard and lampard where box to box mid fielders, kinda like veira or yaya, all around players who are a problem when the go forward.
Scholes > Vieira > Gerrard > Keane > Lampard
They watched every match from the 90s to make assists. There is even a story of how Opta employee borrowed the only vhs from Swindon with all goals because there was no other option.
Griezmann was a top 3 Ballon d'Or candidate twice in the last 4 years. When was the last time a British player archived that?
Hint: it was 2005, almost 15 years ago
Grismannen is from Uruguay.
Why did any combo of them never work well for the NT?
Lampard = Gerrard >>> Scholes
Scholes was just that shit
but when he retired lampard/gerrard without scholes on the wing did nothing either
Gerrard>Lampard>>>>>Scholes
Scholes lmao
based
>scholes
Overrated meme player
why do people keep trying to sneak scholes into this debate? who next, jermaine jenas?
Lee Bowyer
He didn't drag them to the CL final win, Didi Hamman did.
Slips that cost them the league
Scholes: 0
Lamps: 0
Slippy G: 1
Scholes = Lamps > Gerrard
gibe englando pls
Scholes > Lampard > Gerrard
So i guess he just constantly hit lucky shots right? But all of lamps and scholes longshots were pure skill?
1. Lampard
2. Scholes
3. Gerrard
Honestly surprised by people putting Scholes on top. Scholes was a system baby who only thrived when Man Utd as a team did. Lampard and Gerrard so often put their teams on their back, helping them perform well beyond their level.
Don't me wrong, Scholes had talent. But he didn't have the mentality, intelligence or leadership that the other two had.
Scholes was the system, utds entire attack was built around him
Scholes was the attacking pivot that the most successful and dominant english football team ever was built around
Gerrard was the best big game player. Lampard was the most consistent player. Scholes was the best at passing sideways, I guess.
Scholes was probably the best but Lampard was very based. Definitely my favorite
>'Attacking pivot'
>Team rained in crosses on the likes of Cole and van Nistelrooy through their peak years
If anything the likes of Giggs and Becks were their 'attacking pivots'
>Gerrard was the best big game player
Gerrard > lampard >>>>>>>>>>> scholars
Anything else is pure delusion
>mistakes = not big game player
every player makes mistakes
>english players
all trash
youtube.com
what big game player makes this many mistakes in big games?
>they played him as DM to feed his ego
They did it out of necessity because Hendo was suspended after the City game
Gerrard was the best defensively out of the three especially in his early years. He actually started off as a pure DM.
He just has the most goofy highlights because he actually HAD to play the most defense(out of necessity) out of the three.
He also carried his team the hardest and don't see how Lampard or Scholes could replicate the impact he had for Liverpool
Scholes>>Gerrard=Lamps
Every great SAF team was built around Scholes and then he came back and won another league just to prove how much they needed him
Scholes is a defensive midfielder.
Gerrard made an average team around him look top class
Lampard scored more goals than many strikers
fuck you, comparing them is absolutely retarded, they are all amazing
We can all agree Giggs was shit tho
Marry Scholes
Fuck Lampard
Kill Gerrard
Scholes>Gerrard>Lampard
>Majority of the flags saying Scholes was a meme/shit are of the UK variety
You can almost smell the scouse stench
Blooter
L
O
O
T
E
R
>only scouse scum watched scholes
no m8, you are probably underage. he was never world class at any point unlike the other 2
Best: Lampard
Worst: Scholes and Gerrard
Same
Gerrard is the best mid the prem has ever had
this. him viera and toure were the only true complete midfielders in the premier league era
>they played him as a dm just to feed his ego
>Griezmann
Sounds german. Do francs even exist?
>England NT
>working well
The nation is cursed with a weak mind since they lost their empire. Can’t even get the balls to leave the faggy EU
Possibly the most brainlet tier thing I have ever read
Now Beckham, thats an overrated player.
Based yank
>Scholes is a defensive midfielder
When you piss away possession with 10 retarded long shots a game occasionally one will go in.
> Gerrard
>intelligence
He's the player with the highest peaks and the best balance of technical and physical ability, but he was an idiot. A sort of rampaging chaos zone. Allowed his side to in theory beat anyone but in practice limited their points output across 38 games. Scholes, who was always trapped inside his physical limitations, never able to give an 11/10 performance, played deep far better than Gerrard because he didn't just forget his job halfway through a game. Lampard, who on paper is just Gerrard minor, ended up bettering him in league performance through consistency and playing the percentages.
tl:dr all these English players are about equal, and all of them were better than Ballack
childhood: gerrard > lampard > scholes
adolescence: scholes > gerrard > lampard
adulthood: lampard > scholes > gerrard
don't @ me
scholes talent
lamps hardwork and consistency
gerrard leadership
overall:
lampard > scholes > gerrard