Thoughts??

thoughts??

for references cryuff is 94, eusebio 94, ronaldo 96

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-09-03 at 6.52.50 PM.png (1000x635, 965K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=nrOLGifnMJk
youtube.com/watch?v=IWXaPBbSYqc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>they rate Zidane

Imagine the retards who only watched a handful of World Cup games justifying it

Attached: 1495441056248.png (500x373, 427K)

Cringe
Zidane was never great

The bald fraud was carried by Henry

eusebio was twice the player fat ronaldo was
90s player overrated as usual

First of all they've got his years completely wrong. How was his prime 96-98? He was at his best at Euro 2000 and his first few years at RM.

And those stats are ridiculous. His prime should be 94 with about 80 pace and 60 defending max.

He won the world cup 98 so they say it's his prime

>85 pace

Attached: 1528661626518.jpg (727x480, 38K)

Nigga, are you even old enough to be able to say you saw R9 play in his prime let alone Eusebio?

*wins the world cup*
*dabs on cryuffs grave*
*wins 3 CL in a row*
*makes Yea Forums seethe*

youtube.com/watch?v=nrOLGifnMJk

ITS TOO FUCKING EASY