>big "six"

Oh no no no no

Attached: fivethirtyeight2.png (481x305, 21K)

Other urls found in this thread:

fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-premier-league-is-a-two-horse-race-again/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Transitional periods la

manu has been shit for quite a while now,i would still rate them abouve arsenal

Man United more likely to be relegated than win the league?

>Transitional periods
>Arsenal has been in "transition" for forever now
>Tottenham reached their peak the last few seasons
>Man United still looks just as shit as they did 5 years ago despite the 100s of millions they spent
This argument seems to only hold up for Chelsea honestly

they probably are when you think about it

Its been the big two for a few years now

It's a big 2 now get used to it

>>Arsenal has been in "transition" for forever now

Yet have still won 3 FA Cups while Tottenham have 0 (zero) trophies for their golden generation lmao.

It's been 2 seasons.

Not really, Liverpool were off the mark until about a year and a half ago.

It's actually the big one

The big one? Which one would that be, the one that won all domestic trophies, or the one that won the Champions League?

Manchester City obviously

fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-premier-league-is-a-two-horse-race-again/

>4 games playes
>1% probablity to win the league
What a stupid chart

true though innit

So being champions of Europe is meaningless?

It's called big six because they are the biggest clubs and generally will take up the top 6 spots unlike others which fluctuate, the premier league has pretty much always had a two horse title race the two horse this time just happen to be way ahead of the rest.

Cope
They are called big 6 because the PL is supposed to be exciting until the end with the 6 potential winners having some tense race and are always able to take points off of each other

there are 20 potential winners but every title race ever has pretty much been between two teams.

In the past when Liverpool went to play Arsenal or Manure you always thought you were in for some tight game rather than a blow out

Winning the CL asks for something else than winning the league, Manchester City have a lot more depth in their squad than Liverpool which makes them much more likely to perform consistently in the league, even when the match schedule gets busier.

so? you can say competition between the big 6 has gone to shit (I agree) it's still the big six

Theres nothing big if 4 of them are cumdumpsters for the other 2.
It's the big 2 and runner up 4, like in Spain

The difference is in Spain it's the same big two all the time. In England the big six have done a lot of rotating in the last 10+ years but with a very small number of exceptions it's always been them.

>FA Cups
ayayai

There’s never 6 teams competing for the league in a given season. It’s always 2 or 3.

Champions league trophies only count if you were the champion of your domestic league

If they weren't that far ahead before, then it wasn't a two horse race was it

It's not a big two. It's just a big one now. How can there be a big two when no one including city can beat liverpool this season?

Is the Barclays® Premier League the new Bundesliga? It's become a 2 team league.

>bundes
>2 team league

Sure thing shitty, now HAVE SIX and relax

It's just the Premier League, it's not been sponsored by Barclays for years now

Manchester Saint Germain

>Fivethirtyeight
>Trusting Nate "Kike Hillary is a certainty to win, white genocide now" Silver

Nate silver gave Trump a much higher chance than most pundits

leipzig and bayern

Liverpool had one glaring hole that they fixed, Utd have loads

I remember how beatup he looked on the new after he won. He looked like we was going to cry, lol

Makes Spurs even more pathetic.

>Nate Silver

Attached: 1567277338727.jpg (640x631, 60K)

>Nate Cobalt
It's a 'Yikes!' from me i'm afraid. How's Madam President doing?

He gave Trump a 30% chance of winning, considering he in no way won comfortably (losing the popular vote) I'd say he actually did really well.