Do European sports really do this?

the lines doesn't look like to be in parallel with the line of the are, what retarded faggot championship is this?

it's more retarded when you find out Ronaldo didnt actually scored right then and there, instead he took his time and went in the box and avoided two defenders who had plenty of time to track back and then he scored.

italian referees you absolute mong

at what threshold do you stop and start enforcing that though? A line has to be drawn somewhere

his arm does not represent him to score, so does not count ig

We need an automatic system that immediately tases offside players

I totally agree, but since we now have the possibility to check such thing, you have follow the rule. I know it makes no sense, they are on the same fucking line. But imagine the shitstorm if a ref allow a goal even though he saw an offside on his screen?

Lines are not paralel to the box line
Technology is still not reliable. We need a last man camera on the side of the pitch

the threshold should be you have to view the play in real time and find conclusive evidence contrary to the call to over rule it

this is the heart of the problem with instant replay in sports
of course but those rules weren't written with the intention of 700 hd cameras and super slow motion catching the them. nobody wrote these rules with the intention of a referee catching something offside by a cm with world class athletes going in real speed.

if the infraction is big enough to be detected by the official and real tome the player had no real advantage simple as. Plays being enforced cuz mm bullshit infractions has been going on in the NHL and MLB a few seasons now. Replay is a mistake

think the simple solution is to have a var room but only allow deciding officials to look 3-5 times at actual speed and they cant obviously tell the call was 100% blown it should stand. Fuck this slow it down frame by frame to check down to the mm its retarded

look at the grass lines. don't worry this technology is sure and precious, that's basic geometric calculation, the only doubt is about the exact moment the ball leaves the foot, 0.1 sec is about 80 cm of distance while running

a

How do you decide what's conclusive?

an infraction is an infraction

video technology made sports a multi billion dollar industry. now the same video technology is sucking the fun and life out of it. i feel like theres a lesson here but can't quite put my finger on it.

>NOOOO YOU CAN'T HAVE VAR IT KILLS THE SOUL OF THE GAME!

Attached: crysoy.jpg (785x731, 101K)

sure is funny to see your team get screwed by offside goals right?

no, but if the game stopped every few minutes for video check i wouldn't have a team in the first place.

100% correct

you do understand they are just going to keep slowly adding more shit to review when people get outraged at a single missed call over time and eventually your sport of non stop action will be bogged down by 15 minutes of reviews every half which is going to be ridiculous in a sport with a continuous clock. either adding 15+ minutes of stoppage to every half or what seems more likely from an outside observer is they never add enough stoppage time and you get jewed out of 5-10 minutes of play every half

how does that change anything you moron

That's clearly offside.
You should be more outraged over the ridiculous handball rule, Laporte's arm was against his own body and the ball initially deflected off a Spurs defender's arm onto Laporte's. Absolute joke disallowing that and ignoring the rugby tackle on Rodri

why is the line coming from the guys shoulder or is it suppose to be his face?

Shoulder

so you can handle the ball in soccer with your shoulder?

Shoulder blade. That's what the ref told Sterling in the match vs West Ham

There are not that much of this kind of plays in a match. So it's all good.

You have to call it every time. It's the most fair thing to do. You can't also just leave as a case by case basis. It's harsh sometimes but only cheaters complain about reviews

in NFL it's an essential part of the game at least

Look at the new hand ball rules and it says something retarded like "if the arm moves outside of the natural shape of the body". What does that even mean? That's not a clearly defined and observable thing, it's up to individual refs to make the call.
The new penalty rule about keepers having their foot on the line isn't being reviewed by VAR in the PL because of the Women's World Cup shambles.
There's precedent to have things not be VAR'd and change the rule to state the attacker has to be wholly ahead of the defender.

>the rugby tackle on Rodri
lmao

How is his foot behind his shoulder? It makes no sense

you have to draw the line somewhere retard
what else would you propose?

>ball initially deflected off a Spurs defender's arm onto Laporte's
No. It went straight off laporte's arm, he basically assisted a goal with his arm and you think that shouldn't be disallowed