Are Rangers or Celtic more based?

Are Rangers or Celtic more based?

Attached: image.jpg (1024x685, 593K)

They are based as each other, which is very unbased indeed

Clearly Rangers as they aren't >kafflik pedophiles, plus Celtic are twinned with the likes of St. Pauli and other liberal scum. Rangers have based HSV and Chelsea

Neither are based

Rangers

Celtic are somewhat left wing, so are obviously superior.

they are both scottish so they are both cringe

>do you prefer piss or shite?

>left wing
>superior
wrong and not based. away with you

aren't rangers a working class team too?

Yet seeing their fans you'd think they are Irish and English clubs respectively.

Aberdeen

Rangers ez thanks for playing

third lanark

Aren't the rangers sucking monarchy-dick?

They are just reactionary. If tomorrow morning Celtic fans demanded for Ireland to be put under the anglo yoke again they'd have banners for a unified Republic of Ireland ready by noon.

Celtic, obviously.


Rangers are loyalist scum.

For me, it's Partick Thistle.

Attached: Partick_Thistle_FC_logo.svg.png (1200x1200, 290K)

Baseder?

scots are all scum

Basedest

For me it's Glasgow Girls F.C.

Rangers FC (IL) ceased to exist as an active football club in 2012, when it was placed into liquidation after being unable to pay a tax bill.

do celtic fans want this drunkard back?

Attached: EByGuqGXkAEpcgu.jpg (960x1707, 289K)

Celtic.
Rangers are nonces and traitors to their country who should be put on the wall

>Partick Thistle nil

Attached: billy-connolly-tspl.jpg (600x400, 67K)

based