This is the face of a rapist

This is the face of a rapist

Attached: image-1368856-860_poster_16x9-ofyc-1368856.jpg (860x484, 41K)

Other urls found in this thread:

givemesport.com/1498790-supercomputer-settles-the-lionel-messi-vs-cristiano-ronaldo-debate
arxiv.org/pdf/1802.07127.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You WOULD know, mudslime!

>I fucked her from the side. She made herself available. She was lying on her side, in bed, and I entered her from behind. It was rough. We didn't change position. 5/7 minutes. She said that she didn't want to, but she made herself available. The whole time it was rough, I turned her onto her side, and it was fast. Maybe she got some bruises when I grabbed her. (...) She didn't want to 'give it to me,' instead she jerked me off. I don't know any more exactly what she said when she was jerking me off. But she kept saying no. 'Don't do it' -- 'I'm not like the others.' I apologized afterwards."

>Messi: 1.21
>Penaldo: 0.61
eternal reminder

What's this, exactly?

>Rapist
>Simply admitting he paid off a lying whore to keep her mouth shut

He paid her off because even if she is lying, it would be very damaging to Ronaldo's reputation not to mention the legal fees of dragging it out in court.

He didn't rape her. 300k is a small price to pay compared to ~400k in court fees AND loss in ~5 million in sponsorships.

t.lawyer

Attached: EBjzbesXkAEH_fm.jpg (360x270, 21K)

Cristiano Ronaldo continues to make his fans happy on the field. Off of it, however, things aren't looking so bright: A woman has accused him of raping her in 2009, and there is an extremely sensitive document that supports her story. His lawyers say it is a fabrication. Is it? By DER SPIEGEL Staff

When something happens in the world that stirs people's emotions, it is reflected in headlines and news programs. Newspapers and TV broadcasters then report on the story until other issues arise -- with the consequence that scandals are quickly forgotten before the process of resolving them has really even begun.

That pattern is one that has also emerged in the Ronaldo case.

Little has been heard in recent weeks about the rape accusations that have been leveled against the football star. But that silence is misleading: In Las Vegas, the investigation into Ronaldo continues apace.

The American Kathryn Mayorga, 35, alleges that Ronaldo, 33, raped her in a Las Vegas hotel in 2009 -- allegations which he denies. What is beyond dispute, however, is the fact that he paid her a large amount of money as part of an out-of-court settlement so that she would not take her allegations public -- and especially, to prevent her from assisting in any way with the police investigation that took place back then.

Yet there is a confidential document in existence, the interpretation of which almost necessarily leads to the conclusion that Ronaldo admitted to his lawyers that he had sex with Kathryn Mayorga against her express will.

DER SPIEGEL is in possession of this paper and hundreds of additional documents, most of which come from the Football Leaks trove of information. They reveal how a team of lawyers managed to silence Kathryn Mayorga nine years ago.

In late September, the former model from Las Vegas went public with her accusations anyway. In conversations with DER SPIEGEL, she related her version of what happened in 2009 and how severely the incident traumatized her. She said that she has never been able to get beyond the event and find peace.

In addition, Mayorga has filed a civil action against the Juventus striker. Her new lawyer believes the nondisclosure agreement she signed so many years ago is not legally binding and says that Mayorga had not been legally competent at the time it was signed.

Ronaldo's legal team has consistently sought to prevent any media coverage relating to the case. Most recently, one of his media lawyers sought a preliminary injunction against DER SPIEGEL -- but without success.

Ronaldo's new defense attorney in Las Vegas claims that the documents from which DER SPIEGEL has quoted were evidently "stolen" by hackers and "significant portions" of them "were altered and/or completely fabricated." He has not, however, offered any evidence to back up that claim, nor has he presented affidavits from the lawyers who were involved at the time -- or from Ronaldo.

Now, new details have emerged. They show which of Ronaldo's lawyers at the time created or revised what document, when those changes were made and who the document was sent to. These papers could be decisive for the ongoing police investigation because they indicate how Ronaldo apparently viewed that night in Las Vegas.

The key document appears to be a 27-page questionnaire that was developed by Ronaldo's lawyers to get an impression of what took place in the early morning hours of June 13, 2009, in the Hotel Palms Place in Las Vegas.

Around one month after that night, Ronaldo's London-based lawyer Simon Smith received a message that a woman in the U.S. had accused Ronaldo of rape. Almost immediately, a highly professional legal team was assembled around the superstar, who had just transferred from Manchester United to Real Madrid for a then-record sum of 94 million euros.

In addition to Smith in London, the legal team also included the law firm Lavely & Singer in Los Angeles, the defense attorney Richard Wright in Las Vegas and the lawyer Carlos Osório de Castro in Porto. The latter is one of Ronaldo's closest advisers and is in charge of negotiating the player's contracts.

On Aug. 3, 2009, California lawyer Jay Lavely prepared a 41-page PDF with the title: "Questions for Client." The next day, he sent it to his colleagues Smith and Osório de Castro.

In an email, Lavely warned against having Ronaldo fill out the questionnaire himself. "It is very important that neither the client nor his cousin or brother-in-law should write any memos, notes, emails (or anything else in writing) in answering any of the questions which we send to you. That should be done verbally either by telephone or in face to face meetings. The attorneys should be the ones who memorialize, in writing, the answers to the questions. (...) Otherwise, anything written by the client about the incident or related matters (...) may be discoverable in any legal action that is filed."

At 10:21 a.m. the next day, Aug. 4, 2009, Osório de Castro wrote to a confidant of Ronaldo's: "When is CR flying to the States? What does his life look like tomorrow? I need 2 (!) hours with him to provide answers to the dozens of questions from the American lawyers about the young woman. Sorry."

Additional messages make it clear that Ronaldo's brother-in-law and his cousin, both of whom had been with Ronaldo in Las Vegas, were to be questioned by a colleague from Osório de Castro's law firm. That lawyer, Paulo Rendeiro, created a Word document ("that makes it easier") and sent it back to Osório de Castro. The subject line: "For tomorrow."

By around a month later, all of the interviews had been completed. On Sept. 9, Rendeiro created a document with all of the answers, made final changes two days later and sent it directly to Osório de Castro and another lawyer in the law firm named Francisco Cortez. The attachment was given the title: "Q&A."

Some of the answers were already translated into English, but the rest was in Portuguese. At 6:13 p.m., Cortez answered: "Are you translating the Portuguese today?"

Osório de Castro wrote back at 6:23 p.m.: "I wasn't planning to."

Cortez at 6:26 p.m.: "Okay..."

At 6:59 p.m., Rendeiro wrote: "At the moment, the document is 'for our eyes only.'"

Cortez at 7:08 p.m.: "Okay. I just wanted to know how to translate things like 'bola de cuspo' and 'toca-me ao bicho.'"

he exchange is just one of many indications that the attached questionnaire cannot have been a falsified document. Cortez quoted formulations that are part of Ronaldo's answers. Loosely translated, "bola de cuspo" means saliva, while "toca-me ao bicho" means: She touched my dick.

Three months passed, during which time Ronaldo's lawyers tried to reach an out-of-court settlement with Kathryn Mayorga. Time was of the essence, because just a few hours after the incident, the young woman had gone to the police and had her injuries documented -- but she hadn't yet come out with the name of the alleged perpetrator. She was afraid to do so, she says.