MLS v SPL

Which country is better at (association) football?

Compare both national teams and domestic leagues.

Attached: indexs.jpg (342x274, 17K)

>best league
Scotland
>best nt
US of A

MLS > SPL
USA NT = Scotland NT
Scotland fans > American fans

usa has a better league and team

You can't honestly call the MLS better when so many mediocre Scottish players have moved there.

US national team is better, SPFL is a better league

scotland might have the dumbest league in the world might as well just make it a best of 5 tournament between celtic and rangers.

SPL is the best league in the world la

luv me Rangers
luv me pints
luv me country
simple as

I'll shit on Mls any day of the week but at least it has more then 2 clubs

In all seriousness the MLS and SPL are about on par in terms of quality of play from what I've witnessed, but the Scottish structure is much better than our stupid playoff shit. My local club is in the second tier so I unironically follow Rangers more closely than any MLS franchise

>spl
>scouse accent


you well and truly hate to see it

>the US national team is better

No it isn’t. The current group of Scotland players are better than the US’s.

Scotland has a better league, and but USA has a better national team

SPL es duh best league innae woruld la

lov m' raengeuehs
lov m' paints
lov m' cuntreeh

sempul as

Soul
Soulless

your getting skelped tommorow night m8

Nice quads

MLS is more enjoyable to watch. I'm not sure if it's better quality though as the SPL does appear to actually play with defenders at times.

love hearts
love my mum
cannae understand anything else

simple as

2 USA mt captains were also rangers captain.

Attached: Rookie..png (592x368, 346K)

MLS is more entertaining as it seems as though most of the clubs are on a similar level with each other, while in Scotland the only teams who have been able to win the league are Rangers and Celtic, the latter of which won everything since 2012. But I would say that the SPFL (or at least the teams in the top half of it) are better than MLS teams on average

There is a conspiracy theory that the mls establishment is making the defense of mls teams terrible in purpose to maks the game have more goals and appeal the americans

Its a long long time since conspiracy was just a theory.

The US mens team is obviously a lot better than Scotland. Their league is more competitive as there's complete financial parity but fairly sure Celtic, Rangers and Aberdeen would beat any mls team.

EVERY SATURDAY WE FOLLOW
WE GO TO MICKEY DS
TELL EM 50 BIG MAC BURGERS
AND A LARGE DIET COKE PLEASE

SINCE WALKING IT IS HARD
ILL HOP IN MY BIG CAR
YOU WILL ALWAYS US SNORING
WATCHING DIVEGRASS AT THE BAR

Welcome to the famous WATP

Very very silly argument.
Lets say MLS and SPL combined into a 45 team league.
Top 5 teams - 2 SPL, 3 MLS
Next top 20 teams - 18 MLS, 2 SPL
bottom 20 - 18 SPL, 2 MLS

MLS has much more money, it isn't fair.
And the gap for the national team program is just as wide now, it isn't particularly close.
and that gap is going to get much much wider whenever MLS feels like it.

this. In a short time line, no one outside of the top 4 leagues will be able to compete with MLS money.

Why does everybody ignore the money?
If the old firm had access to billions like manc has we would over shadow every team in Europe, why? because its catholic vs protestant, white vs white. pick a side.

Still no reason for any of you little bitches to talk shit about your own club or own league.
I dont care if youre in guatemala, norway, africa, scotland.. "omg youre not a top 10 league" is simplistic insecure pussy shit.
We get that a lot in the US "lol mls sux", why retard - because we became a top 10 league in 25 years but we still cant beat up Barcelona and Madrid?
Have a little pride and stop being such pussies.
Support your local club.

MLS would unironically shitstomp the SPL
USA team would also beat the Scotish one

I take Umbridge in being involved in your link string my good man, I was merely pointing out facts and not once did I disparage the good name of Glasgow rangers.

Never watched MLS but it can't be much worse than celticwinslol

right right, didn't mean to argue with you, more so a common talking/arguing point.

especially on this board, and especially in football, its like = "oh you're only a top 9 league/national team in the world, lol how pathetic not elite"

>national teams
ah yes the mighty England C team vs the USMNT

mls probably has more parity
but rangers or celtic could probably beat any mls team

i don't watch international oofball so i couldn't tell you

Money is starting to trickle into Scottish football,
7.5 mil for the worlds best center back
2 mil for the worlds best left back
etc

Doesn’t help if all the money is going to one club

hardly. there's 3 englishmen in the squad. NI, Wales and Ireland have about 10 each

>0-3 Kazakhstan

>American free from English rule since 1776
>Scot still under English rule in 2019

A challenger appears

Attached: 20180427_CPL_logo_CORRECT.png (960x500, 50K)

Daily reminder that 'Rangers' ceased to exist in 2012 as a result of being unable to pay a tax bill, and they are currently being liquidated by BDO.

None of our good players played.

>hating based playoffs

found the faggot in the thread

>everyone who disagrees with me is a homosexual degenerate

based retard

This is all one autistic Mlelsoiboy, btw. He likes to make retarded pro-MlelSoi arguments and then samefag immediately afterwards.

Scotland has the better national team since our national team is mlels shitters being ran by an mlels shitter nobody. Scotland also has better teams like Celtic and Rangers but an overall slightly worse league than Mlels.

Could Scotland beat trivago on a warm humid night in Port of Spain?

Our national team is atrocious at the moment but we have some good young players coming into the scene , you lot managed to tie with France recently in a friendly, not sure we could have done that at present

im not calling you a gay faggot, im calling you a retarded faggot

MLS is better supported and has higher average attendances, which feels weird.

If Atlanta keep it up, they will have a higher average attendance than any EPL team besides ManU and Spuds

but like nobody outside of the stadium watches. they don't get 200k viewers(out of 320 million) for nationally televised primetime games

meanwhile premier league gets 600k watching it in the morning on a competing but similarly accessible channel

The US National Team literally won a World Cup a month ago how is this even a question

>dykemuttball
Not a sport

>"""""""men's"""""""" divegrass
Literally doesn't exist

Dilate, tranny.

So? Our fans are doopin mental, who cares about bums sitting on the couch watching?

Attached: g8v0u4wrrmiy.jpg (585x553, 82K)

Soccer is a sport for women and children, which one are you?

Attached: tumblr_lq8tj0bkVj1qdubnjo1_400(2).jpg (356x534, 46K)

dilate, tranny. Dykegrass is a joke

MLS supporters groups always come off as forced and that they’re there for the supports group and not the sport.

>s-s-soccer isn't a women's sport!
>Lots of real men play it!

Attached: 28fj3w.jpg (633x758, 62K)

Probably a fair assessment, though our national team is just starting to climb out of a hole

Celtic is better than any MLS team, idk about the rest of ths Scottish teams.

*intimidates you*

Attached: 20190813_110048.jpg (213x160, 35K)

yikes

iirc scotland has the highest attendances in europe when you account for population differences

it is indeed the top highest by population ratio

Rangers could beat every team in the MLS. Celtic, too.