*keeps clean sheet*

*keeps clean sheet*

Attached: EBNUgraWwAE3_kU.jpg (680x537, 81K)

*soils the undies

Just the one

>de boss

how expensive was the entire defence?

BLACKED

reminder

Attached: mustafi.png (1080x993, 1.37M)

*keeps being shit*
ftfy

dubs and they will concede more goals than last season

where's the goal leading errors?

the only stat that matters there is goals conceded

Goals conceded: 40 each

When did they sign Chapelle?

individual errors leading to goals you cone head

Well Mustafi has a 20% higher tackle success rate so Mustafi's individual error rate is lower.

Attached: quote-if-i-have-to-make-a-tackle-then-i-have-already-made-a-mistake-paolo-maldini-139-77-38.jpg (850x400, 55K)

least intelligent post of the year. not only displaying you don't understand football but also statistics

Canada needs to be eradicated.

Attached: canadian.png (628x349, 53K)

>h-he fucks up more tackles because he's better!!

Brainlet

>no more Chuckle Brothers
feels bad

I cant wait for the season to start!

Attached: 1508549968446.jpg (600x829, 60K)

How does having a 20% higher tackle success rate not matter? I genuinely don't understand how anti-Mustafi drones arrive at this conclusion.

Based.

If Mustafi has more it just means he has worse team mates, while the Magpie dude has people covering his ass.

Football isn't basketball, stats don't matter that much

Attached: D42yLYzWAAAe5co.jpg (1080x1080, 251K)

>the guy with the better stats is also the one who's won a World Cup

I'm not sure what point you were trying to make but ok.

The point is that obviously van dick is better than mustafi but the stats make it look otherwise

Nonce

>van dick is better than mustafi

No he isn't you utter mong.