5000 mass shootings later

>if we really cared about mass shootings we'd be dominating

That's because Europeans are generally much smarter than Americans. Especially race realists.

if lebron was a mass shooter the us would be number 1

I love listening to 200 year old justifications for having shit loads of weapons in a country with a lot of stupid people.

>He's actually talking about the intelligence of mass shooters

kek

Nice

imagine if lebron had took up shooting instead of basketball

>200 years
>no invasions
>two little cheap plane attacks
>despite all the heat and seething the us generates
seems like it's worked pretty well

based

Imagine the recoil control MJ would have.

Only our 5th best criminals go for mass shooting

Until you have someone with illegal guns try to rob you in your house you don't know how nice it is to not be completely helpless

Paddock's 58 was decent. 851 injured is unheard of even though it's not really relevant.

Can't wait for the anarchy when guns in America are banned/restricted and all the criminals run around freely with their AK's

They're not, but you need a license. It is illegal to carry.
are you retarded or are you incapable of adding the total numbers of mass shootings and deaths in both countries, also adjusted for per capita?

>no invasions
>need to build a billion dollar wall to keep Mexicans out

Attached: images (44).jpg (553x555, 18K)

SPANKED!

We're not allowed to shoot them for some reason.

Only two words:

Per capita.

Attached: Top_lel.jpg (304x315, 45K)

this but unironically

Alright mate, Brazil wins

>9/11? oh that was nothing

cope

years
>>no invasions
Because we're surrounded by two oceans
>>two little cheap plane attacks
That changed the landscape of American foreign policy forever and fucked over the American people through the Patriot Act
>>despite all the heat and seething the us generates
>seems like it's worked pretty well
It works well until you get shot by an incel and then you're dead like the other thousand victims who've died from these shootings in the last twenty years.

Do amerisharts tip their shooters if they survive the shooting?

Attached: image.png (288x300, 146K)

Why would they if the shooter doesn't do his job well?

Do Europeans not tip shooters?

The fuck does it have to do with guns though? You wanted us to take out two planes with concealed carry? Or is your rationale that if you can't stop two planes from hitting a building, why have guns at all?

We only tip shooters if they do an exceptional job
Tipping shooters is not mandatory

>this obsession with American gun rights
Euros can't complain when another ignorant Amerilard opens up on them in every single thread.

Attached: 1414737991814.jpg (363x326, 42K)

Lmao

Attached: 1551111510221.png (327x316, 208K)

They have illegal guns because legal guns are so easy to acquire in most of the country tho. There's an element of "the cats out of the bag", I suppose, but the Brit is right.

fucking kek
you aight pierre

>is right
>is not dumb

this is impossible.

Attached: Risitas.jpg (220x240, 14K)

mate, the only thing more stupid than a right winger is a left winger

basé mdr

How often does that happen to anyone? It’s such an irrational fear. The vast majority of burglaries are by somebody who knows the occupants and has been in the house before. If by some insane chance your house gets randomly targeted it’s an opportunistic crime, they just want to take a laptop or Xbox so they can sell it. They will run away the second somebody notices. I can’t understand how you really think somebody is going to come into your house and threaten to commit murder over a relatively small amount of money.

Maybe if you did we wouldn’t have beat you bongfucks

America is vast and their police is idiotic so in some cases that argument makes sense.

The argument that doesn't make any sense is "they'll just get guns illegally"...no they won't, you have no idea how hard it is to acquire an illegal gun. You gotta know types (usually criminals) to get it. These mass murdering incels would never get a gun. It would solve their school shooting issues.

We lost because the French stopped us with a blockade

twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1056919064906469376?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1056919064906469376&ref_url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/413624-trump-calls-migrant-caravan-an-invasion

>no invasions

we have way more blacks here who shoot each other over $10, spilling a drink, etc... home invasions where the burglars kill everyone inside aren't exactly a rarity here

People just want to get on that moral high horse

he looks like he lost it

curious, how many times has a black person pointed a gun at you?

Attached: ).png (327x334, 192K)

its largely driven by a very powerful weapons industry and gun lobby at this point. they promoted the message that you can truly be a free american unless you have easy access to powerful firearms. the gun industry generates billions in revenue and has allies throughout all levels of american government.

They actually are a rarity

And you never hear these same people getting passionate about putting breathalyzers in every car or being more strict about the contents of processed food, which would both save a lot more people than guns in hands of good people

I don’t have any issues with Americans loving their guns but I would rather they just be honest and say they love owning guns and don’t care if it causes problems, all the other excuses like fighting a tyrannical government, when there’s literally interment camps full of children existing right now is peak mental gymnastics.

>unless you dedicate yourself to every issue your arguments are irrelevant

based

>could he do it at a rainy school in texas?

Superior fast twitch trigger pulling genetics

Attached: 1480184242665.jpg (340x427, 32K)

>euros making fun of us as if they don't have a terrorist attack every other week
tip top kek they don't even mention what was once belgium or france anymore

>euros making fun of us as if they don't have a terrorist attack every other week
we don't though...

Based

It's all about location. Breivik had the advantage of an isolated island in a complacent country.

actually quite recently (late last year?) there was a change in the law, semi-autos for hunting are now banned because of breivik, semi-autos for sport shooting have much stricter laws, if not entirely banned as well.

He had planned it seriously, remember he exploded two cars in the city so all emergency resources would concentrate there and he could attack the island longer
He also had a cop uniform, had planned the date and had been collecting explosive material for months
He didnt just grab a gun and go to Walmart like this mong

Attached: DE6B1F9C-93C3-4767-8EA1-1EB093F4DBC8.jpg (750x761, 63K)

>I would rather they just be honest
Asking for honesty in this world is like asking a stone for blood.
People use facts to support their stance, they don't use facts to choose their stance. So saying we should reform our gun policy because of facts x, y and z will not matter one bit to someone who has already chosen their opinion on the matter.

think about it
>most bullets
>fattest people

He used a bomb, not a gun