And that’s the tea sis

>as much as Messi makes while playing for the NT
> ie the money FIFA gives to winners
> Messi
> NT
> Winner

user...

I have some bad news...

the men literally don't get paid at all. They simply earn winnings based on tournament revenue.

Also
>USA population: 327 million
>ARG population: 44 million

WC winners get like 2M each

>more people watch the usa female national team than our male national team

First off, that isn't even true with the 'within the US' caveat you forgot to add on.
Second, it's not just about TV ratings within the US. Worldwide ratings matter. Attendance at games matters. People watching friendlies matters.

Has anyone, in the fucking history of time, ever watched a US WNT friendly? Or attended one? Someone find all 10 of those people and tell them they can pay the added salaries for these stupid cunts.

Shut the fuck up chi

well, the US men haven’t ever won the world cup.. so...

like I said, it is based on tournament revenue. As things are, women already get a higher % of their tournament's revenue.

How much do the winners get paid?
Is the team or tournament paying?
What about the other teams?

people complaining that women soccer players make $2,000,000 for a tournament?

Attached: 1562693815148.jpg (584x503, 49K)

I'm a male model and I wish I made half of what I would as a woman

Attached: Screenshot_12.png (887x704, 85K)

Those Dallas boys better call their agents

Never use math when arguing with women.

Men WC winners would destroy anybody here while playing on one leg. A spee amateur team made not of players, just fit athletes, would obliterate USWMNT well over 20-0.

Washington Post. They're hysterical still after 4 years of OMB

They should be competeing in the real world cup and paid equally if they want.

Talk about % of the population. We're a smaller country than the USA, but 3 MILLION people for Argentina is a lot.

Someone said "turn the channel to the world cup" at the bar the other day and I turned and said "the world cup was last year, wasn't it" but they meant the women's world cup so I said I was watching the show that was on about tricking out classic cars and not to turn it. I wasn't really watching the show, but soccer is for children.

i thought americans didnt care about soccer

I watched a gaggle of school boys slaughter the USWNT in Dallas. It made my dick hard, I love role reversal and age gap.
>oh, little boy, I'm gonna bully you with my tits
>fat chance, dyke, no one can beat the cock
>oh no I am mindbroken and addicted to jizz
I fapped for like three weeks to that game.

We care more about Gaelic Football than soccer.

>330M+ live in the US
>10M watch insufferable dyke complain for a month straight
>last US men's WC game had 15.5 times the viewers in 2014!

/thread

As soon as they generate as much revenue worldwide as the men do then by all means. Why would you pay somebody more for bringing in less? I think soccer is for fags and never watch it but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that men’s soccer is FAR more popular than womyns

YAASSSS

>Hard hitting statement. Hard hitting statement.
Using this headline format should result in immediate firing squad.

We don't, but the globalists that own the media do.

Can they just have the Men's team play the Women's in a full 90 minute match?

sometimes I burst out laughing when I see certain headlines from these lefty rags

What are you comparing this to? The last time our men were in a World Cup, they had literally double the viewers.

Attached: 5cda4ny.png (946x1131, 999K)

great way to kill the league. im down with paying them more.

Nah. We just pay them more to show how economically unviable it is

False and if you included worldwide ratings it would be even more false

>this kills the liberal
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO

Cringe but redpilled.

Us men team shouldn't be paid for how utterly terrible they are

>it was the most-watched soccer match on English-language US television since last summer's men's World Cup final
This sentence literally means nothing aside from trying to mislead the reader into thinking that the women are setting a record (which they're not)

holy dimes

>fair
Sure, as soon as the women's wm generates as much revenue as the proper one. What is it at right now? Like 2% of it?

A
FUCKING
STAR

The tournaments don’t earn revenue separately though
Broadcasting and sponsorships are sold for both world cups together

where is this information?

>players make most of their money off sponsors, not by cup prices
It’s worse than that
The women get paid next to nothing by their clubs
Thus they should be able to seek higher wages for the one women’s tournament that makes any revenue, but they can’t because the World Cup isn’t a free market for their services. There is only one team they can play for.

Attached: costanza baby.png (300x333, 109K)

>women
>soccer

terrible meme, fuck off

I remember a time when people played for their country out of loyalty, until football federations started to pay bonuses for winning things

Things that never happen: the post.

Just cut the men's pay to less than the women's. When was the last time they delivered us some yuro mad? That's what the US soccer pay scale should be based on.

Here's a funny fact. Viewership for the women's world cup is like 15-16m which is down from the 2015 one which had 20m+.

So womens football is actually losing viewers.

Why is there no info on the worldwide viewers for the Girl's WC final?

>i thought americans didnt care about soccer

This isn't about soccer, it's just an excuse for Leftists to talk about their "gender pay gap" crapola again.

Attached: S.jpg (331x344, 40K)

There's something that's not quite clear to me. While it is true that women's world cup's overall revenue is much lower than men's, it is a fact that the US football association has earned more from women's games than men's games. Does this not mean that the women should get paid about equally from the football association? Why should it matter if the men's world cup's overall revenues are higher if that doesn't account for any more money to the association? Or is there something here I'm not getting. Legit question

>it is a fact that the US football association has earned more from women's games than men's games
Yeah no.
It is not a fact.
Us soccer has to pay those chicks salaries and pay for an entire league of women to play.
If us women stopped playing entirely, money would increase for us soccer.

nobody watches US women's friendly matches. In person, or on TV. Nobody watches the women's professional league in the US.
they don't make more though. The numbers don't support that, even with the men missing the WC. The numbers are closer, but in your standard 4-year cycle where we make the WC, the men blow the women out of the water in profits. The men's WC run in 2014 made way more money than the women winning their WC in 2015.

citation needed

the only source that has been cited said that they earned $900 million more from 2016-2018, but in 2017 and 2018, they actually made $1 million less than men (basically they used the range because 2016 was $1.9 million more)

>and just 6 hours later, the Men's gold cup match doubled these viewers

The CHI effect

>women
>for all intents and purposes, they play only the world cup matches every four years because even the most limp-wristed outspoken "fan" doesn't give a shit about their league or friendlies
>as such their worth as sponsorship targets is incredibly low because nobody is going to even remember their fucking names two years from now
>men
>performing well if they were hypothetically good would hypothetically inrease viewership for MLS or foreign leagues the players play in
>if people actually managed to give a shit about MLS, they'd be much better sponsors because they play constantly
really not hard to see why

there is no wage gap, when compared with hourly wages instead of yearly salary, the difference is infinitesimal

the gap exists because women may work 2000 hours a year (40 hours/week x 50 weeks, 2 weeks unpaid vacation), but men typically put in more overtime. as it has been shifting over the past couple of decades with the "women in the work place" shit, more women are putting in that overtime and it's closing the gap

You've been a victim of fake news. Why did they choose a certain period? Why only just 3 years?

Attached: SoccerRevenue-e1561156954768.jpg (488x544, 28K)

this. also most of them arent working extreme physical labor jobs so whatever "stats" they're using are skewed kike shit. until i see a roastie working a roof job i dont want to fucking hear it.

Well, they are more entertaining than USMNT.

Womens football is mostly semi pro. Why should female footballers get paid 100 times the amount of other semi pro players like female hockey or handball?

You've spent enough time at my house edging the driveway to know otherwise, beanboy. Tell Marcos when you're coming back, I need more of that special mulch.

Argentina is cucked
Can any sudacas confirm the argies are the biggest SJW retards in south america?
Also can brazil please invade and fix this shit

They're literally overpaid

Attached: 1562686623656.jpg (803x342, 57K)

>argies are the biggest SJW retards in south america?
i mean, just look our commie pope. argentina needs glassed.

biggest jewish population in south america and huge feminism

This. Also pornstars

Based on what? That's bullshit

we are working on it

MSN on the NT team soon

>USWNT makes $100 million a season
Not a chance, this entire world cup made less than that.

us women team play like 25+ games a year, they have many token friendly tournaments

Who cares what a bunch of American boomers think about men’s soccer. These people followed the narrative of “it’s boring” for 45 years, they don’t deserve a say in it

>ratings
>WC womens finale 14 million
>WC 2018 Russia 1.12 billion viewers worldwide for the final, total 3.572 billion people watched the 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia™
>Results like 13:0, 5:1, 5:0, 4:0 etc all over the board so imagine the football quality
EQUAL PAY NOW.

Attached: g5gy.jpg (465x625, 62K)