4-time World Cup Champs, Back-to-back World War Champs, how can other countries even hope to compare?

4-time World Cup Champs, Back-to-back World War Champs, how can other countries even hope to compare?

Attached: us-flag-21-apr-2017.jpeg.jpg (621x414, 41K)

How many World Cups and World Wars does your nation have? For me, it's four and two respectively.

USSR was the Messi of WW2 and USA was the CR7

USA was the Darren Bent of WW2, a tap in merchant who did little else except score an easy goal once the game had already been won.

>WC
Women, so irrelevant
>WW1
won by British and French
>WW2
won by Soviets and British

>We were used to an opponent the stature of the Russians; we were amazed at the contrast. During the war, I have never seen soldiers disperse head over heels even though virtually nothing was happening.

>Five Russians were more dangerous than thirty Americans. We already noticed that in our few days in the Western front.

>Again the pace of the war surprised me, the Russians would never have let us have so much time! The Americans took so long to close the pocket, especially given that nobody around wanted to fight anymore. A well organized German corps could have closed the pocket in a week.

lmao

Who are you quoting m8?

Cope

Otto Carius, Tigers in the Mud

Cheers. He sounds truly redpilled.

>4-time World Cup Champs
the US has never won a World Cup lol wtf?
>Back-to-back World War Champs
not sure you were even present for WWI, if you were you sure go there late.
and you only showed up at the end of WWII after Britain, USSR, France, Canada, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, Denmark, Greece, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, South Africa, Yugoslavia had already done most of the work.
But thanks for your contribution!
>how can other countries even hope to compare?
with their health-care and shooting-free schools, workplaces, malls, post offices, public parks, etc.

Attached: b19f7ff754ea81849c7041e5c505ec74 keanu cheers mfw .jpg (170x372, 22K)

>>WC
>Women, so irrelevant
It's a world cup, keep coping
>>WW1
>won by British and French
Right, just ignore the fact that we were involved in the Spring and Hundred Days offensive which were crucial to ending the war and that it was our numbers that made the difference by the last two years of the war
>>WW2
>won by Soviets and British
Right, just ignore the fact that another world power (Japan) was left completely unchecked by the Soviets and British until it was far too late and America had to step in and almost completely take care the Pacific theater.

the secret to winning football is foreskin - there has never been a cutlet victor of the WC

The women's world cup is a world cup in the sense that the Little league world series is a world series.

What about Israel and Saudi Arabia?

Womens World Cup is not World Cup, its Womens World Cup.

what have they ever won

>Pacific Theater
barely relevant
IJN was certainly competent but IJA was a mess, as demonstrated by the fact that they were curb-stomped by post-purge Soviet army

you're implying they could've attacked Soviets, but Soviets always kept sizeable amount of troops there during the entire war

Not trolling now, American aid and contribution was certainly highly relevant, but ''America won WW2'' is a filthy lie
it was a team effort

americans won WW2 (which was started because hitler was denied art school)

reminder that montenegro lost both World Wars

>Britain
Provided staging area and kept the Axis occupied during the early part of the war
>Soviet Union
Endured huge casualties and bogged down the Germans in the East
>USA
Had unparalleled industrial strength and only nation to majorly engage the Japanese

WWII couldn't have been won without all three. Stop fighting frens.

>how can other countries even hope to compare?
The best team doesn't always win in soccer. One missed foul or good acting job or lucky penalty kick and it is anyone's game.

that German feel

>Womens World Cup
They don't count

>you're implying they could've attacked Soviets, but Soviets always kept sizeable amount of troops there during the entire war
The IJN navy was already ahead of the the brits Royal Navy (who were busy blockading the Nazis) and second to ours so if they were left alone, Japan could have easily conquered all of the European powers' colonies in Asia and even Africa if no one was there to stop them.
>inb4 b-but it doesnt matter because they all got independence!
Britain and France (independent France) would've had to muster up naval forces (that were already strained in the European theater) to take on the Japanese and probably wouldn't have won considering how ahead the IJN was in 1940. Colonies like India, Chinese port cities, and Indochina would've provided the resources for Imperial Japan to become an even bigger threat and would've have harmed the economies of Britain and France.

>The IJN navy was already ahead of the the brits Royal Navy
I disagree
They spent so much effort on Germans because American involvement checked the Japanese

Japanese however could never threaten British hold on India, let alone Africa

Mate the army was a mess in China already before Pearl Harbour, granted it was much due to foreign aid to the communists and Kuonmintang. There is no way Japan could have sustained control in China, SE Asia or fucking india in the event of a serious rebellion by locals. Not to mention Japan was lacking in oil, even with the oil fields in SE Asia, since they didn't have the educated manpower or freight capabilities to make use of it.

>actually arguing with americans over WW2 contributions

Your generation was indeed the greatest, and we're grateful for their part in liberating us from Nazi occupation. Too bad all generations after them sucked ass

excuse me that was us canaCHADS

only countries that have walked on the moon are allowed to post in this thread.

ESA btfo

Attached: myeyes.gif (425x318, 130K)

With this level of education it's no wonder the Chinese are absolutely wiping the floor with the US

are you sure you guys walked on the moon or did you use a NASA developed mobility scooter

>Japanese however could never threaten British hold on India, let alone Africa
The issue with the Japanese is that they went with a total war mentality and tried to fight their way to conquering Asian countries and colonies when what would have been a far more effective strategy was to block their access to the sea and starve them out economically while being more intelligent with their expansion. The Chinese mainland invasion (not Manchukuo) failed because they were retarded enough to try to take on hundreds of millions of Chinese with the relatively unimpressive IJA (who were more technologically advanced but not that strong) against the Kuomintang and CCP who employed guerilla tactics to heavily impact Japanese progress.
>Not to mention Japan was lacking in oil, even with the oil fields in SE Asia, since they didn't have the educated manpower or freight capabilities to make use of it.
Japan was (and has always been) resource poor but they had state of the art oil refineries. The problem was getting the oil to the Japanese mainland. The most retarded thing Japan did was ignore the significant amount of oil field in Manchukuo which they were literally sitting on top of but couldn't find (the Daqing oil fields). Indonesia also had some relevant oil fields which they did use.

The point I was making is that Japan could have easily controlled much of Asia and strengthened itself had America not intervened. They were a very relevant power in Asia and Asia was still important to the European powers up until the end of WW2.

America invented the cuck porn... And I'm grateful for that.

I WANNA LIVE IN AMERICA

Attached: 1539564600172.jpg (480x480, 114K)

Wtf dude, know your history. uncle sam took a big oll right before completely liberating the Netherlands.

To add to this, if America never took down the IJN, who would've been there to stop them? Britain? Their navy was getting old and was not up to date (not enough aircraft carriers) by 1940. How would they be able to successful wrestle away control of their asian colonies from Japan when they were busy in Europe? France? The Free French Navy was not anywhere strong enough to defend their indochina colonies. The soviets? Their navy was an even bigger joke considering that the IJN humiliated Tsarist Russia and their Navy at Port Arthur in the Korean peninsula a few decades prior. The Soviets could only successful stop a Japanese land force, not a strong navy.

USA is the Patrick McCaw of world wars

Money