She's right you know

She's right you know

Attached: FB_IMG_1562433969828.jpg (1080x1080, 108K)

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2018/08/21/no-venezuela-doesnt-prove-that-socialism-will-bring-about-a-zombie-apocalypse/?utm_term=.c6461cd263ce
nytimes.com/2014/02/01/world/americas/as-argentine-economic-crisis-swirls-president-keeps-low-profile.html
usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/11/25/bernie-sanders-immigration-return-deported-immigrants/76371112/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

*Women's World Cup
Silly lesbian, it's not a World Cup.

Fuck off already Megan
You’ve started enough threads

first time in her life she's butthurt I guess

>4th megan post on the first page
based and USWNTpilled

God I hate this fucking dyke

Yeah, cancel Copa America, the oldest international competition in the world over some "world cup" invented in the 80s

>da maaaaan
>da patriarchyyyy

Tinfoil hat dyke

After the way they celebrated against Thailand it's a blessing people are even watching the final. Fuck those cunts.

i didnt even know it was today hahahahahahahahahahahaha dumb dyke

>the oldest international competition in the world
get the fuck out of here

this funny thing is this board got butthurt way more than her for just stating the obvious, even fifa admit they fucked up

t-this can't be a real quote right? hahaha
stop devaluating your flag, use a proxy or something

because it isn't you dumb faggot

Do these dykes unironically believe this?

Do progressives think this, like if you go to Portland or some other liberal town are they treating this as a big. deal?

name another +100 years old international cup

oh

Attached: 1.jpg (184x184, 11K)

>when asked about sunday's scheudule
>the state of incel reading comprehension

What is the third one? Women, Copa and?

British Home Championship

Wall Bowl

>from 1888 to 1988
That's 100 years old. Copa America is 103 years old

home internationals m8
(it's not defunct, it's on sabbatical)

Attached: megan literally rapinwho.jpg (884x615, 44K)

>implying i care enough to fully read anything related to these liberal scum

>1916 is older than 1888

>sabbatical
31 years is more than that

wasnt the world cup final last year? those africans won

it's a long sabbatical

103 years old is older than 100 years old

Queen Elizabeth II is older than George VI

The World Series

Not international and not football, there are older club cups than Copa America, but the thread is about national teams

Progressives like soccer. It's a sport for women and gays in the US. They're excited for the all day semen slurpathon tomorrow.

Are you using the term "progressive" in a pejorative way?

Attached: 1.jpg (419x360, 27K)

>Not international
>Literally called the WORLD series
>Features the best players from the Dominican Republic and teams from Toronto and once Montreal

ok The Ashes

>Argentines don't know what oldest means

No wonder their economy is in the dumps.

Progressivism in its current form is literally cultural marxism, my naive friend

absolutely ascended b8

COPA AMERICA CARALHO!

Fuck dykes
Fuck jannies

Attached: 5b8d43fed9e44.jpg (1214x697, 105K)

was this tournament even aired in the US?

Marxism and progressivism are literally opposites

Marxism, as well as economical libearalism, are uthopic idealist ideologies that believe in static conditions

Soccer is primarily liked by people with progressive political values. I wasn't kidding when I said it's for women and gays. It's only pejorative if you don't like those things

Attached: 2SeattleSoundersPrideResized.jpg (550x286, 84K)

>cancel everything

>to watch women who lost to under 15 Dallas FC boys

no

>Marxism and progressivism are literally opposites
they have a great deal in common

>It's only pejorative if you don't like those things
No, it's pejorative because you said "they are the only ones who enjoy that semen slurpthon"

Dude... modern progressives like Bernie literally want socialism/communism. You sound like you're in college or something. I was like you once, then i experienced the real world. Just remember this post when you get older

Full blown brainlet post. And no, I don't consider myself as a "liberal".

Attached: 546.png (205x246, 5K)

Heterosexual women and gay men slurp semen you literal troglodyte

Still won't watch your league

lmao, underrated

>implying slurping semen is a negative thing
bit prejudiced desu

and they say we are arrogant
look at this dude

They have two things in common: They suck absolute balls and only brainlets follow it.

I'm not defending marxism, it's as bad as neoliberalism. Just sayint that's not a progressive ideology, but the opposite, they want to move to a "next stage" where is no next stage, so they want to stay the same in an uthopian world, that's not progressive

>so hideous she's caused Americans to root against America just to see her lose
4D chess

think the progressives want the same thing mate.

Attached: brlet11.png (190x266, 5K)

This thread is an incel honeypot. If virginity had a smell, you would need a fucking gas mask to browse it.

Attached: h51WRwA2_400x400.jpg (400x400, 22K)

You are getting really hung up on definitions here. By progressive, everyone here is referring to the modern day Democratic party in the United States, not some irrelevant definition you read in your college textbook. The modern Democrats want the US to advance into a next stage of socialist/communist policies that create equality of outcome, hence why they are Marxists.

What do Norway, a progressive country, have in common with North Korea, a communist country?

How can you speak with all that Muslim cock in your mouth, m8?

someone rank copa america, oro and women world cup in terms of most viewership

>The modern Democrats want the US to advance into a next stage of socialist/communist policies
But the most important figures of the Democratic Party (Obama, Clinton) have nothing communist in them

Maybe you are confusing economical with social definitions, or I just don't follow you. Not a single big political figure in your country, regardless the party, wants to abolish private property

And asking rights for women and gays isn't very Marxist, they were treated like shit in communist countries, or at least put in a back seat

i saw Senegal vs Uganda game last night and it was so much better in terms of quality than women's final will be

The British home championship

She's not right, the World Cup was last year.

They're not on at the same time though
bitching for no reason smhtbhfamo

Copa America
Women's World Cup
Gold Cup

Dude you're so fucking retarded. Of course they're not gonna call for abolishment of private property right away. That's way outside the overton window. Dunno what that means? Go google it you dumb fuck. Do you not think Bernie Sanders and AOC are prominent figures on the left and LITERALLY call themselves socialists?? Do you not think Elizabeth Warren calling for the abolishment of college debt AKA welfare is socialist as fuck??? Back away from the keyboard, change your fucking flag and come back so I won't roast your faggot ass again bro

they are very different, true. but there are similarities between progressive ideology and marxist ideology - the belief that the government needs to act to right injustice of some kind or other and steer society toward a better future

Of course she's right but she's also a woman. Thet's unresolvable predicament on Yea Forums.

>she's so irrelevant that people had to make these epic shitty facebook macros proving she's irrelevant and i had to save them to post on the chan

Attached: 1561370527165.jpg (1920x1152, 298K)

>"world" series
>only american teams playing this shit
Can you stop being fat, please?

They call them socialist but that's not communist, see the Labour party in Britain, they even have all the socialist symbology in their logo, but they aren't communist

Care to elaborate what you understand by progressive? Maybe I'm just lost in translation here

t. megan rapisthoe

>implying dykes dont love strap on anal

Blue Jays

jesus fucking christ this is one of the worst polsperg posts ever made on this board, you can smell the oozing fat.

Attached: 1560864072471.jpg (1024x545, 115K)

lefty types who harp on about gender/seuxality/racial inequality

Socialism, per Marx, is a transition stage between Capitalism and Communism you dumb FUCK. Nobody is going to come out as a straight up communist but that is what these fucking retards want. Bernie was a huge fan of the USSR and its policies, bud.

Stay mad bongboi, say hi to the grooming gangs for me

Are you talking about socially left wing then? Marxism is far from that. Read what Che Guevara said about black people or gay people. Or see how many female Party Leader have there been in communist countries

If they go to elections they aren't communist. Even if he was, he's irrelevant in the American politics

I guess it depends on what you're progressing towards.

Attached: sj.png (783x219, 44K)

she's basically discriminating latinos and our century old tradition, isn't that racist?

>haha you dumb paranoid incel, there's no chance we'll become communist if we concede them just this one thing
>what, Drumpf wants to build a wall to stop illegal immigrants from entering the country? Can't have that, that'll lead us straight into totalitarianism

shut up achmed

You are so fucking dense, dude. Bernie almost won the fucking Democratic nomination in 2016, how the fuck is he irrelevant. AOC is on every news show every night, how the fuck is she irrelevant. Of course communists go to elections, how the fuck would they get anything passed. Fuck you're so dumb

holy fucking RARE

agreed, i don't think they are identical, but there is a similar oppressor/victim mechanism at work in both. there's a case to be made that lefty academics in the 60s and 70s retooled marxism for the post-industrial situaiton and this created modern progressivism

Bernie has had a seat for a time now, right? What laws has he presented that sound socialist to you? All he's done just sounds common sense, not socialist

Kind like Obama, except the external politics

Are you talking about Foucault? He's not Marxist but maybe I uderstand what you mean by progressive then

Foucault, Fanon, Marcuse, all the bullshit that Derrida spawned, Butler, that lot, yes

Sigh...

Universal Healthcare
Abolishment of college debt/free college
Extreme taxation on the rich

Literally all of these undermine capitalism to an enormous extent.

>He's not Marxist
true, but very influenced by Marx

i agree.
tomorrow it's womens euroleague final,
beach handball euro championship final (men and women), beach volleyball world championship final. probably like 50 other finals.
they should just cancel her shitty ass final for more important events

The difference with these (neomarxists, or poststructuralists) is that they don't believe it's all about money or material conditions like old school marxists did

Marxism has more in common with neoliberalism or neoconsevadurism than to neomarxists

He spent almost his whole career refuting Marxism

you need to understand that to amerifats, "extremely liberal" would be the middle of the road party in every other nation

>Extreme taxation on the rich
always makes me chuckle because him and his wife are rich, but I bet if his plan ever passed he wouldnt lose a dime somehow

Gold Cup

Holy shit can they stop complaining about every single little thing, they're like gayer versions of ronaldo

Neoliberals are progressives in the common parlance. Don't get so hung up on semantics.

French structuralists and pomos aren't Marxist in the slightest

they are only "influenced" by it in the sense that Marxism was pervasive in academia at the time, but if anything they opposed it. they were edgy as fuck.

We have all of them but we aren't communist, we just believe education and healthcare are human rights and they should be free of charge for the users


As I said, Bernie just sounds like he has common sense to me, not like a communist

They like to say they are, and in theory they are, but when you see neoliberal congressmen vote they vote against most individual rights like abortion, legalisation of drugs, etc

They tend to be progressive when it comes to production and money but really conservative in social terms

But they agree that something is fundamentally wrong with the existing order and needs to be subverted.
>they don't believe it's all about money or material conditions like old school marxists did
Possibly because given the post-war first world situation, if you were a malcontent who wanted to tear down the existing order you couldn't moan about capitalism not providing for people.

Burgers love to claim that people shouldn't have access to healthcare despite the fact that it costs the taxpayer more to run the current system than a universal care system would

>Burgers love to claim that people shouldn't have access to healthcare
Ooo, he is tryin

Sorry bud, NONE of those policies are common sense and do not have any place in a free market, capitalist system.

You are living in a socialist country, not a full-blown socialist country but it is socialist.

I agree but I think in this thread we were talking about the social way of the term "progressive", and communist countries werent very good in that regard

Why do you think it's ok to pay taxes to get "free cops" but it's wrong to pay taxes to have "free healthcare"? Is your private property really more relevant than your health?

Attached: why dont he want me madame.jpg (500x500, 62K)

REEEEEE stop pointing out that i'm choosing a place arbitrarily on a continuum and justifying it by identifying with only one of the poles

kek

They should put the women's Copa America or something on during the men's World Cup. Equality.

Based naziposter

socialising the costs of loads of things are common sense
>healthcare
>trash collection
>police
>military
>transportation

That's where you're wrong, bud. Plenty of Dems vote pro abortion and pro drugs.

Throughout this conversation I've discovered that you don't really know much about American politics. For example, you said that Bernie was irrelevant. This is simply a false statement. Just admit that you are using examples from your own country and extrapolating. The Argentine system is NOT comparable.

different organizations, they cn do what they want
also, the few who are watching amateur hour are still going too, its the lot more thatll be watching the copa memerica that might give tou dykes a chance

>Is your private property really more relevant than your health?

Based on people's behavior here, yes, it is.

Typical american, doesn't understand not evrerything revolves around her.

>budposting

Attached: costanza3.jpg (600x600, 88K)

>world series
>only fatmericans
this stupid faggot

Why can't you just chose both?

it's a matter of what is important and what is feasible.

Upholding the law is more important here considering the rate of crime, etc. it's also feasible because we can pay for it while still maintaining a capitalist system where taxes are not out of control

Universal healthcare in a country of our size is not feasible. The strain it would put on the economy would be insane, as healthcare is much more expensive than law enforcement.

you can, must of us just don't. We thicc

I just don't get how the fuck, FIFA doesn't sanction the USA woman team, if this would be any men team they would get legally speaking raped, not only the talk against FIFA but also they push their political agenda, which is prohibited.

yes, in a world with infinite money we can choose both.

The people will decide

There are no other womens football matches being played though. There are other sports being played like tennis, cricket and mens football but asking for them to be cancelled just to cater to another sport is pretty silly.

You live in the first world, if we, the third world, can have free universities and hospitals, then why can't you?

>Universal healthcare in a country of our size is not feasible.
Whyever not? It'd be a better deal for 97 ish % or so. But it would mean smaller profits for insurers and suppliers, and more taxes for th every wealthy, hence the propogandising against it. The Tory party here are still butthurt about the NHS existing, but people like it so much (even some Tory voteres) that openly coming out against it would be electoral suicide.

>You live in the first world, if we, the third world, can have free universities and hospitals, then why can't you?


Because our universities and hospitals are first world and yours are third world. Also, while we are a first world country, a good amount of our population are third world.

i'm sure he's crunched the numbers. nevermind the fact that we already have centralized health care that is consumed basically at no cost by BY FAR the most expensive people to provide care for.

I think you just made my point for me? You are 3rd world. Maybe if you were a more capitalistic society, you would be first world.

I think people like the NHS because they don't know that the alternative is amazing.

Trump hates poor people

>a good amount of our population are third world.
Maybe if you had public services of quality these people would still be first world, see some European countries

Lowering inequality lowers crime too, so you spend less money on cops and the justice system

washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2018/08/21/no-venezuela-doesnt-prove-that-socialism-will-bring-about-a-zombie-apocalypse/?utm_term=.c6461cd263ce
>In Argentina, socialists-in-all-but-name ran the economy so poorly they very nearly brought about a Venezuelan-style collapse.
The fact is, you can't really pay for your system.

nytimes.com/2014/02/01/world/americas/as-argentine-economic-crisis-swirls-president-keeps-low-profile.html
>Generous social spending after the economic collapse, like freezing household electricity rates, has widened Argentina’s budget deficit, encouraged energy consumption and increased the country’s dependence on energy imports, eroding the central bank’s hard currency reserves.
this is nothing more than a house of cards, friend.

Our university is better than yours fat fuck and most of this "social justice" bullshit came from your shitty country

That's the same as saying Senna, Elvis or Hitler are on a sabbatical

It's not that universal healthcare is not feasible. The problem is that the US is incredibly heterogeneous. Not just in terms of demographics, but socioeconomically too. Any federal system has to be one-size-fits-all, and thus will cater to the least common denominator. When you have places like Vermont, Atlanta, New Mexico and West Virginia all in one system, that's an extremely big undertaking.

By and large, the solution is to let it be on a state-by-state basis. All states have a "Medicaid" program, which provides qualified people with state-provided healthcare coverage. Many states expanded this to cover pretty much anyone who isn't getting coverage from another source. The problem now is the handful of states who refuse to do so either for practical or ideological reasons.

>very nearly brought about a Venezuelan-style collapse.
I've heard right wing media saying that meme for the last 10 years, that's just spreading fear so people vote against their actual interests

With globalisation you don't need to implant dictatorships to secure a neoliberal president anymore

>the alternative is amazing.

Attached: health care.png (1184x757, 64K)

>the alternative is amazing.
it doesn't look it

OK friend, I'm sure the Venezuelans thought the same thing. There's NO WAY your left wing media could be spreading propaganda that you bought hook, line, and sinker. No way, you're waaay smarter than that. Let me know how you feel when you're eating cats to survive. Just remember this little convo we're having.

are they not?

>cater to to the lowest common denominator
Not sure I follow you here. How can healthcare do this?

this is misleading, Americans have more health problems in general, like obesity. Are you one of them?

the freedom to choose your healthcare provider is something you sad sacks will never experience. I get to see who I want, when I want. Stay waiting in your "queues"

not him, but I presume he means that some places will necessarily take on lower standards of care

I'm not defending Maduro, just saying Cristina was nothing like him

So, we weren't turning into Venezuela. These are completely differnet coutnries with different history, culture and productive systems. Venezuela went to shit becuase they rely 100% on oil and oil price dropped

>When you have places like Vermont, Atlanta, New Mexico and West Virginia all in one system, that's an extremely big undertaking.
economies of scale would allow to get very good deals from suppliers

it's not misleading, I suggest you read about "deaths amenable to healtcare" before weighing in. Beyond that, even if that is a complicating variable (which is why life expectancy is a bullshit stat for measuring health care efficacy), I suggest you go look at 5 year cancer survival rates from the same study.

>the freedom to choose your healthcare provider is something you sad sacks will never experience
Lol. a) not true - you can go private if you want
and b) Why the fuck would you want to shop around for healthcare?
>Stay waiting in your "queues
I had this weird feeling in my heart. Saw a GP in twenty minutes. Had an ECG within the hour. Treatment is prioritised. Boomers have to wait for their hips to be replaced, but thems the breaks.

>women sports

Attached: Screenshot_20190706-134856.png (1440x720, 599K)

>I get to see who I want, when I want
This is actually false under the majority of health plans. You've also failed to understand that there are private healthcare professionals and facilities in most developed countries in addition to their universal systems.

All socialist/communist 3rd world countries end up the same way, hasn't been a single success in history. How is your 3rd world country different from any other? That's a rhetorical question, because we all know the answer already: it's not :)

I'm not defending communism, I'm saying we aren't communist nor heading into Venezuela 2.0

>Pay more for a worse service on average
>Get scalped by insurers and big pharma
>Rejoice at the fact because Fox news says the alternative is Communist Dictatorship
Kiked.jpg

HAHAHAHAHAHA YOUR TOURNAMENT ISNT IMPORTANT SWEETIE HAHAHAHA SEETHING HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yeah, offering free health care and free higher education to niggers, spics, and white trash is just going to do wonders for crime.

All it will do is encourage more retards to attend university who don't deserve to go, also niggers will abuse the free money at university and just fail because it was free.

Why are lesbians so angry.?

For example, let's talk about pricing. This is IMO the most critical issue for our system, more than coverage. How do you determine what price to use? The median income in Arkansas can't afford the average rent in Los Angeles, so do you use California prices and inflate the shit out of everything in Arkansas, or use Arkansas pricing and crash the healthcare economy in California? It's like this across the board. Each state and community has unique needs. Atlanta has a lot more sickle cell anemia than Manchester, New Hampshire.

>correlation implies causation
Brainlet. The US has the highest preventable morbidity in the developed world, and takes on a significantly higher load of complex cases. We're unhealthy people who also take the most unhealthy people from France.

You don't have 50 million people living off the system

>correlation implies causation
that's not what's going on here, friend. you're out of your depth.

Yeah, just keep them as pariah and not intergrate them into the system,t hat sure won't make them more violent and commit more crime

All you can do is integrate them into the system, not push them even harder

Suppliers are already paid by the federal government based on a percentage of the average market wholesale price. The US government is not allowed to negotiate from this system. Now we're talking about repealing several other laws and figuring out a new way to negotiate. And once you start getting into the world of "the government will say what it pays" then you run into constitutional issues.

yes it is misleading, not only are the lifestyles not comparable, the CARE is not comparable. The whole argument is about quality of care. It's not uniform. That needs to be held constant before any comparisons are made.

>Boomers have to wait for their hips to be replaced, but thems the breaks
In America, we don't need to wait in line if we have serious injuries :)

It's not false, the better the plan, the more choices you'll have. If you work for a big corporation, your plan will give you plenty of options. And how much does it cost to see a private in other countries? Probably more than it does here under an insurance plan, which is $0 in a lot of cases.

Also, our country has the best medical talent in the world, because there is a huge monetary incentive to becoming a doctor. Our private doctors are guaranteed better than in other countries.

Lack of dick, obs.
Dildos and fingers just aren't the same thing.

our labor force participation rate is much higher in the US, our unemployment rate is much lower, and our average wages are higher. It should actually be substantially easier for the US to handle the burden.

>:)
You disgusting smug faggot. Third world countries aren't shit because of low IQs or whatever other reactionary shit you believe in. They're shit because countries like yours and mine fuck them over constantly and use them as sources of wealth extraction.

>All socialist/communist 3rd world countries end up the same way,
Nope, Cuba is based, largely because the USSR was able to protect it from your god-awful regime.

Attached: 35dd5861acaa86e20501ba9d2a3645a9.jpg (3300x1619, 896K)

>higher healthcare-associate amenable mortality is caused by the healthcare system and not by the health of the population
That's exactly what's going on here. People with diabetes in the US are less compliant, that's just well-known. It's the same issue we have with infant mortality and heart disease.

>I get to see who I want, when I want.
No one is forcing us euros to go to certain doctors and you can go private if you earn a crtain amount of money.

It is but she's a white American dyke so apparently that makes it ok

[spoiler]yes because you have a crystal ball that tells you Argentina is going to be magically different from any other 3rd world socialist country :)

shut the fuck up retard, go beat up your strawman somewhere else. They're shit because of their asinine governmental policies. Look at Venezuela, are you really gonna blame that on a 1st world country? Fuck off

also,
>thinking Cuba is based
Because driving 1950s cars and having damn near no internet

you're saying the quality of care and outcomes, when other variables are isolated, are not related?

Also, retard, most people don't work for big corporations, and even those plans are still very often limited to specific networks. The employee doesn't get to choose their group provider or plan structure, they are limited to the options provided to them, or find a different employer. 1/3 people are in HMOs

Bernie isn't a communist. At best he's an imperialist with some socialist policies. Over here, he would be a middle-of-the-line Labour MP.

that's an access problem, though, you fucking retard. That's the exact argument you're trying to rage against

is there a comparable infographic for russian intervention?

But Argentina isn't socialist

>They're shit because countries like yours and mine fuck them over constantly and use them as sources of wealth extraction.
desu a lot of them are a bit divvy too

holy fucking cringe

>Because driving 1950s cars and having damn near no internet
could be kinda based

someone made a bold claim about the far superiority of health care in the US. First, there's no data to support that. It's modestly better at best. And from a systemic perspective, that increase in quality is unrealized by at the very least a large portion of the population.

What exactly are you trying to prove? That American healthcare is worse? How do you define "worse"? Do any of these other countries need to take care of 300 million people? Surely that factors into the calculation. You're just a mess of ideas, come back when you've put your thoughts together properly

There you go with your semantics again. If you have socialized medicine, education, and high taxes, that makes you socialist.

>there is a huge monetary incentive to becoming a doctor
kek

Attached: 1529684267768.png (1052x1137, 287K)

>I never met this man in my life
Hehe

>WAHHHH ITS MY DAY HOW DARE YOU REEEEEE
kek

do you cringe when Muhammad goes in your ass raw?

>What exactly are you trying to prove? That American healthcare is worse?

No, if you could follow the thread, that wasn't a claim that was made.

don't think they intervened as much mate

It's more of an education problem. There's plenty of access problems, I don't mean to say it's not a problem at all, but the current political discourse is about coverage (medicare-for-all), not access. And cost is, to me, a bigger problem.

Besides, didn't I say that an obstacle to universal coverage is socioeconomic heterogeneity? The problems facing West Virginia, where many people literally cannot get to a doctor, is different from problems facing New York City, clearly.

who is paying for firefighters, police; road work... in america?

yikes, you showed up late and made yourself look stupid. Being smug about it didn't do you any favors m8

>Womens

>we don't need to wait in line if we have serious injuries
no you just need to pay the tab w/ tip

access and coverage are intertwined for lower income strata.

Yeah, you're definitely right there. There's no better place to get treated for cancer, but it's a terrible place to have diabetes.

The NYPD is a communist cell

again though, saying "the alternative is amazing" is plainly refuted by stats.

Then don't be coy, what are you trying to say?

Yeah you're the real genius here

>didn't I say that an obstacle to universal coverage is socioeconomic heterogeneity?
fucking poor people man

It's a broad statement though? How can you refute it without defining "amazing"?

>reasonable self-aware americans
whats going on?

Based informed chad

>countries like yours and mine fuck them over constantly
maybe our countries can do that due to higher IQs

None of the tournaments are at the same time, I don't understand why this man is so angry.

>women playing a sport for children.

Attached: professional tripfriend.jpg (800x450, 52K)

they do it for the orange slices after practice

stop being smug friend. It's all there for you to see if you scroll up. Someone was talking shit about how superior the US system is, implying that the standard of care is much much higher and that provider choice was much broader than it functionally is. Several metrics were cited that showed it's actually pretty fucking close to every other OECD nation, and everyone already knows that numerous factors make it difficult to get apples-to-apples. Then goalposts started being moved, tangential nitpicking flared up, and you pretended that you didn't know what was going on.

There's overlap in some places, but they have different root problems. The consolidation of community hospitals and loss of primary care practice restricts access, but all those people are still just as covered as they were before. Right now, we've done a pretty good job reducing barriers to coverage, but not access of care.

Attached: m_jig190002fa.png (810x1115, 318K)

It's more like the US team who are actually professionals and get to practice like normal professionals because they actually get paid by being in acne commercials vs non Americans that played in High School in their shit 3rd world country who work as cashiers.

good point, I guess you could just be amazed by non HMO plans and the fact that for some cancers, BMI-adjusted outcomes are slightly better.

You're not white so I win

So if it's not apples-to-apples, how can draw that conclusion. Nice try though :)

But seriously who is she?

As a current med student, you couldn’t be more wrong about the monetary incentive especially since the last administration was done messing with healthcare

*Snap*

Yep. This one's going in my rare collection.

Well if canceling all my plans that day why not enjoy multiple finals?

>Capitalism vs socialism

Why is everyone polluting the board with women's football crap?

What a small world

sorry, watching copa oro and copa america tomorrow, dont have time for slow paced wamens soccer

Attached: image.jpg (800x533, 98K)

for you

Kek, KNVB tried for decades to stop women to play football, because "it was not not good for their delicate bodies and could harm their reproductive organs."
Football was for Real Men and most people didn't take women who play footbal serious.
While the men developed themselves to be a bigger player between the european countries, Our women team was always a sort of San Marino.
The Netherlands had a progressive face to the world the last 50 years, but for women football we were more conservative than Iran.

Not long ago there was also something about some KNVB guy who had said that male footballplayers better couldn't come out of the closet, because "it would be bad for their carierre."

So in our country Football is still a bit conservative.

never heard of it

They're memeing it here as well. Nobody takes it seriously though because the actual football has been atrocious. Good fun though spotting the hot ones with your mates and debating how hard you would trash them in a game.

yeah let's cancel all other sports to watch some ugly carpet munchers play Sunday league standard football, fucking retard

we dont like amateur futbol

I wish the USA was half as fascist as the retards on the left think so this dumb cunt would be publicly executed in front of the White House for insulting the president

PS the left is losing all over the world

Attached: 9AEF7876-8584-46FA-A4DC-6F3ED6D84F4D.jpg (750x581, 168K)

based

>The new right is beating the new left
it's not that the new right is good. They aren't. Modern conservatives suck and Trump is a fucking retard.
But holy shit the new left is even worse. Literally everything is sexist (except for sexism against men because that isn't real) and that was especially true during 2016. I even lean left I guess but if forced to choose I'll take the "new right" over the "SJW man-hating left"

Attached: DNC white men.jpg (522x554, 51K)

>womens sports
>cancel everything day
This cunt is an embarrassment. I wish she'd defiling the american flag and replace it with a rainbow one.

God PLEASE kick me in my balls

>wanting a professional soccer player to kick you in the balls
based

Attached: alex morgan kicking.jpg (2560x2351, 743K)

not really. the energy of the womens' World Cup has already died.

womens' football has definitely become more watchable over the past few years, but it's still a million miles from the real thing. the multi0day gaps since the quarters has killed the interest for the neutral. no one watching any of the mens' finals was going to watch the womens' final had those finals not been scheduled. that is a delusion.

I lean left on most social issues but yeah I agree with you, the modern left in Canada and America is fucking retarded. Democrats are going to hand that idiot another victory in 2020 because they just keep going further and further left

Yeah I feel this post, I guess I am just traditional. The left in the USA truly despises it. If they could change the flag to a black power fist they would, they hate everything about our history no matter what, even World War 2 is up next to hate like we shouldn't have dropped two bombs which proves we are evil always yadda yadda. They want to make the Constitution completely new and ban almost everything it allows.

So in a choice between America and Soimerica, I guess I'll just choose the country I was born in.

>the women's world cup isn't even going to be about the sport anymore, it will be an every 4 year's event where women get to come out and routinely trot out their pet feminist grievances before retreating back into unseen mediocrity again

>modern left in Canada
As bad as we have it in the US at least our feminist President is no longer in charge. How long until you can vote out pic-related?

Attached: Trudeau feminist plan.png (896x370, 50K)

Election is in October. He has a lower approval rating than Trump even with out media sucking his cock 24/7. He’s most likely done.

Attached: 17C5F6A5-4440-4CDD-AA50-A71A893A4D17.jpg (750x598, 146K)

*our

What a whiney cunt. If she had confidence that the WWC mattered so much than it shouldn't matter if there are other cups on because people will watch hers. This just shows insecurity in the product that she feels as if there needs to be nothing else on for people to watch.

Although, it is hilarious how hard she makes you faggot incels seethe.

muh weed tho

This

We need to get rid of America cup

THE OLYMPICS

>she

Nice cope, Achmed.

>by the way I'm not an incel, you guys are haha

Way to illustrate your post.

> (OP)
WHO?

In the future, insha'Allah, men will be banned from playing sports.

I live in Portland and no one cares

It's a Women's World Cup final, so nobody cares.

RARE
A
R
A

>literally opposites
>based on utopian ideals
but I rather take Stalinist Marxism (tankie) over progressivism any day. At least Marxism have a sense of will to power where liberalism only breeds death and mediocracy.

raping your dog does not count as having sex Achmed

we should all just not watch tomorrow. keep the numbers as low as possible and their pay will drop further

Thanks to feminism were obligated to care. Nobody has cared about this thing forever but now that this new strongest wave of feminism has come were allll soOoOooooooo excited. Yes im thrilled about the (womens) world cup! Go USA! :)

Fuck off bitch

nothing would please me more, than the USWT losing today. enough is enough. now try this dick, it'll make you straight

Also you can say she is being racist towards South Americans and Africans.

>even World War 2 is up next to hate like we shouldn't have dropped two bombs which proves we are evil always yadda yadda
But you are? Every single step you took in Europe was destructive and that wasn't an accident, leave us alone next time.

>want to look at football news
>get bombarded by a different sport I don't care about
Political correctness is great!

Attached: 531d51eeb3fef8499372ecaf280db5b86c70fcb8386bba28d0a7f10fe6213e13.jpg (800x450, 42K)

Have sex.

>tfw I'm still awake which means I'm not gonna wake up until after noon
meh guess I'll miss the women's game, only thing I'll regret is missing it if they lose

Attached: gsr.jpg (630x865, 422K)

Attached: toto_4-2.png (154x122, 45K)

>dude the women's water polo african championship is on today you need to reschedule the horse racing world cup

Substantial keks will be had if more ppl watch both the golden cup and the copa america compared the womens """""world cup"""""

Kek.
KEK.

This is one of the few reasonable comments in this thread

>t. kankerjoden

Same sport, different competition.

>same sport
So it's legitimate to say all women's teams are terrible since they would lose 15-0 to San Marino?

Is this the same girl who shouted it was science that you can't win without gays on your team? Seems like she needs a special kind of containment.

We will have the last laugh when she ends up in hell for all eternity

what? dykeball is in full shilling mode atm and netherland is one of the most feminised countries in the world. how else you think you do well in a world cup? in an amateuristic sport like this, as soon as you put some money and development towards it, you make giant leaps. same for the fact that the netherlands have so many female medal winners on the olympics: when you develop amateur level sports it's very easy to make big steps

Attached: medel_vs_messi4.gif (480x250, 1.28M)

Based anglo

This. fpbp

The most interesting out of the three. Gold Cup's a joke.

>Cuba is based
>extra-judicial executions
>poverty
>entire economy revolves around sugar
>so "based" that everyone tried to leave at the first opportunity

all the above only stopped once they started abolishing Fidel's commie policies

Attached: 1555677918402.jpg (600x600, 43K)

very based and cubapilled

Like Britain winning any tournament?

The Ashes

>World

KEK

>USA is based
>extra-judicial executions
>poverty
>entire economy revolves around war
>so "based" that everyone tries to kill each other at the first opportunity
>CIA fucking up every country in South America
>history full of inside jobs so they have an excuse to go invade some country with lots of resources

all the above hasn't even stopped to this day

That actually makes the US based.

They would be based if they just invaded and didnt fabricate some reason

>modern progressives like Bernie literally want socialism/communism
Bernie would be considered a pretty moderate social democrat in virtually every other Western state.

STOP HIKACKING THIS!!!!! GO BACK TO FUCKING /POL/ !!!!

this is about making fun of a dyke for being entitled, nothing else

That's a good point.
Also, none of those points make Cuba's own faults go away.

>the year of our lord 2019
>Murrifats still don't understand the difference between socialism and communism

Attached: captain deluded.png (826x600, 668K)

ahahah, does this bitch seriously think anyone is going to watch a female football match? the only way i'd watch a woman play football is if the other team are all male and there was no fouls or cards.

literally millions of people are watching, probably around 5/6 million in Holland alone. Don't like it, fine, but what is the harm? Just don't watch it. I'm not triggered by the cricket world cup either, I don't care so I simply don't watch it.

Social Democrats are the cancer of the Western world.

They scheduled this a few years in advance so the fact she just found out now reveals her awareness of things in general.

I would welcome actual politics based on class or fiscal policy over the idpol we get now in America.

Attached: butthurt.jpg (490x322, 42K)

Social Democrats don't make actual politics.

Corbynite retard.

I can also post an infographic that confirms my views and pass it off as absolute truth for (You)'s.

Attached: Communism_Truth_world.jpg (1364x1630, 374K)

This is a bit of an overstatement

Yikes, zoomer. This was just as popular in the 90s

Female football is amateur tho.

Imagine being btfo so hard

Not anymore, they have been going farther left. They don't even want borders anymore.

checked
Based Thanos

Nah both poles are convinced that 1) the other half of the country are far more extreme than they actually are and 2) the loudest 5% are representative of 50%

Fuck that dyke. I hope we lose, just to our of spite for that cunt, even though I love Alex Morgan so much, bros.

I'm not saying half of the country support them, I'm saying people like Bernie are advocating for open borders.

how much are you being paid to shill this shit?
there's no way you're doing this for free, you'd be even more pathetic than the jannie

>I'm saying people like Bernie are advocating for open borders.
so what you are saying is wrong.

>The attendee also claimed the Vermont senator is "an advocate for open borders." “I’m afraid you may be getting your information wrong. That’s not my view,” Sanders said. "What we need is comprehensive immigration reform,” he continued. "If you open the borders, my God, there's a lot of poverty in this world, and you're going to have people from all over the world. And I don't think that's something that we can do at this point. Can't do it. So that is not my position.”

She's Rap,inoe

Attached: irwinbrain.png (512x599, 557K)

they employ trannies since they take the lowest wages to shill all boards
>gay posts
>tranny posts
>pedo skating general
>it was her turn
>etc

Well, it's true, he doesn't support open borders, because that means that white people would be able to get in. The democrats want a controlled border that primary only allows in woke brown socialists. They are extremely hostile to mass immigration when it involves, say, the Boers.

Bernie wants to give amnesty and bring back illegals who have been deported.
> Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders is proposing a plan that would bring back undocumented immigrants who have been deported from the U.S. if they have close relatives living in the country.
usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/11/25/bernie-sanders-immigration-return-deported-immigrants/76371112/

Fuck off back to r/chapotraphouse

>The democrats want a controlled border that primary only allows in woke brown socialists
that's your opinion, not a fact. If you just invent boogieman stories you're always right.

>the entitlement
American women are foul creatures

It's a fact

no it's not but keep living in your racist bubble hyping yourself up about shit that's not happening. If you honestly believe such /pol/tard nonsense there is no hope for you and I'm not wasting my time on it.

It is an unequivocal fact that the Boers attempt to receive refugee status in Western European, Australia and the USA has been argued against by the same people promoting Muslim refugees. It is a fact that Bernie Sanders called for bringing back deported aliens.

Sorry sweety, but Wikipedia never lies

Attached: copa America.png (835x223, 24K)

IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE HER MOMENT

Coming here to laugh at your little cup

Attached: Stanley_Cup,_2015.jpg (220x468, 30K)

>FOUR marvel references and a spongebob cameo
*snap*
Yep, this is going in my cringe compilation

fuck roasties

Imagine being so shit at a sport that your orangutan/lemur hybrid people can't compete with the humans of a country so you tell yourself you're not allowed to compete in it to justify being so shit
Cope harder sub-apes

Attached: 1489933273744.jpg (895x1024, 143K)